And they’re already kissing Trump’s ass

  • RazTheCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m starting to think of Trump as one of those old school firefighters that would set fires and then swoop in to put the fire out lol.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He was one of the first people saying to ban it in 2020. To me it’s more like he is easily swayed with lobbying so it ends up looking like he is a pioneer on pushing new policy when in actuality he is the first person people go to when they need to bribe a politician.

    • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He absolutely is. All presidents are.

      Those type of firefighters exists in droves still because that is not an old-school thing.

    • Zeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, fuck the CCP for spying on Americans. The US Government would never do such a thing!

      • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I always wanted to ask but haven’t been able to until now…

        When you’re building the strawman, do you do it while the straw is still wet and then wait for it to dry or do you wait for the straw to cure first and then build it?

        I’d imagine fungus would be a key reason in the choice but I’m still unsure about the process and figured I’d ask an expert…

        Thanks in advance!

      • CorpuscularCrumpet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Comparing the spying that both of these countries do on innocent citizens, as if they are anything alike, is demented.

        It’s not apples to apples. It’s comparing an orange to the sun.

        • Loss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You’re right, the us govt captures all internet traffic, all calls, all texts, and has complete subpoena power for all companies that interact with anything in the us; while deploying drones, planes, and satellites that watch us citizens; while encouraging citizens to sell each other out to the government.

          It’s not comparable.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Tik Tok removed platform access from their US userbase voluntarily.

    This was their choice.

    The law is literally not even being enforced.

    • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Noteworthy thing I haven’t seen mentioned here: They apparently only removed app access. The website still works just fine.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I hear that businesses existing in the face of unenforced laws are really stable and enduring. \s

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Large businesses literally operate in conflict with the law until the law directly forces consequences, usually in monetary form. So, until they get caught and are forced not to do the thing. Explain to me why this is any different.

    • Loss@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It was? How do you figure when no evidence of that was presented to Congress according to congressional members and senators?

      • Whateley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They’re probably on the tankie instances blaming this on Uyghurs or some shit.

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So I am assuming most Lemmy people don’t use Tiktok or Meta stuff. Here is some things you may or may not already know.

    • Shou (CEO) made a parting video praising Trump on the last day
    • Shou will be on the stage with all the other tech billionaires during inauguration
    • People have noticed the last couple days that FB and Instagram have had a “link your Tiktok account” so you don’t lose anything on the platform

    I think it’s pretty obvious now that Tiktok is going to become a part of Meta one way or another.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      People have noticed the last couple days that FB and Instagram have had a “link your Tiktok account”

      WTF, how is this not news everywhere?

  • drthunder@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I wish people knew that TikTok being banned was more about it not suppressing posts about Palestine than national security or whatever else they say. Antony Blinken and Mitt Romney outright said last year it was about stopping people from seeing the truth about Israel committing genocide. If the government actually cared about foreign influence operations they’d regulate data privacy and social media algorithms in some way (idk how, but I’m sure you could) but they obviously won’t because US companies manipulating people and stealing their data is totally fine.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating.

      The law also bans every company from doing the same thing, sending personal data to any of the listed adversarial nations or being more than 20% owned by them. Why ban every company if they only cared about the Palestine message?

      • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        50 minutes ago

        So how are a ton of people going to red note? Shouldn’t that have been banned a long time ago if they ban every company?

    • firadin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      How did you go from “foreign influence operations” to “US companies manipulating people”

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Blinken and Romney. name a more trustworthy duo!

      ironic you talk about manipulating people in a comment that’s goal is to…manipulate people.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Hey, look over here at the TikTok performative theatrics while we set up an oligarchy and rob you of your labor, your health, and your livelihood.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Tiktoks removel is not a distraction from oligarchy, it is oligarchy in action. This is meta collecting on what they paid congress for.

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You see me complaining? I’ve never used TikTok, but the entire controversy around it is just wag-the-dog type distraction.

    • brendansimms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Same! It is definitively unconstitutional and the us gov just pushed it through anyway (with even supreme court backing it up?!) Shit is crazy, and yet I see a lot of ‘no big loss’ type comments on it.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The SCOTUS decision was wild too, because it was a fucking 9-0 vote. The decision was unanimous. That’s a word that’s virtually never used to describe the SCOTUS or any kind of government vote. That unanimous decision made it perfectly clear that the government knows something we don’t, and that TikTok had them fucking terrified. My bet is on the genocide being much worse than even TikTok was showing, but TikTok was the only place you could see anything about it that didn’t have a massive “Israel is just helping them root out terrorists” spin.

        • Traister101@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The law boiled down says any applications from Rushia or China are inherently a security risk and therefore can be banned no questions asked (currently they have to go app by app) which to put it simply is extremely concerning. Straight up US great firewall type shit

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Not all apps, review/travel sites get a pass, and the decision is left to the president, which is a dumb way to do it.


            DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

            Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

            (Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

            Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)

      • PunnyName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You think silencing half the entire population of the country is boomer lib shit?

        Ok, boomer.

      • cocomutative_diagram@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        If TikTok has the power to “turn” youth into pro Palestine, they can also turn the youth pro China when China invades Taiwan.

        TikTok is in its expansion phase so it need to show its good will, but as soon as it is large enough, it will seek to do whatever make them the most money, like everyone else.

        Time and time again, big-tech controlled social media have intervened and will continue to intervene with public opinion, Meta, Xitter, TikTok, all in their own ways.

        If government decide to ban meta tomorrow, will you object as hard as banning tiktok?

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Tell that to the millions of American small businesses that thrived on the app. Billions of tax revenue just vanished.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        I see this sentiment a lot but I don’t understand, which small business are doing all of their business exclusive on TikTok?

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 minutes ago

          It’s less about only doing business on TikTok (there are many, however), but of all the other social media platforms, they get more engagement and sales from TikTok than any other platform. (Ask yourself how many people are successfully selling their products and services on Lemmy, for example)

          It allows people to make chained response videos that also shows their work, as well as illuminating the personality and goals of the people who run the business.

          Connectivity between videos, with video responses to comments, is a powerful tool that TikTok does better, and it’s created a boon for many who are self employed.

          When 170 million Americans are using the platform, your level of exposure skyrockets.

      • Whateley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, no. Someone think of the pink sauce lady and dildo sellers!

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          And Quality Patch, Mr Seems, various actual artists who showcase and sell their work, candle makers, authors, wood artisans, leather and metal workers, and everyone else who was doing well and making good products.

          Your flippance shows you know noting.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Spreading for awareness, I’ve been posting this in relevant threads for a week - This is all theater.

    trump is going to “save” tik tok after starting the initial push to ban it (for the wrong reasons) to pretend he did something for you. Worst part is that all of the no/low info voters and non voters will eat it up.

    It’s the equivalent of a person pushing you into the middle of the street and at the very last second, that same person tells the drivers to all stop. “Wow, I owe you my life!”

    And now, this adds two layers:

    1. You think trump and the Supreme Court are colluding? now they get to say, nah uh!!! Even though again, this is all convoluted.

    2. trump gets to look “stronger” than the “highest court in the land” to help delude the next generation of low info tiktok folks.

    P.s. The Chinese “protest” apps are going to mine the FUCK out of these millions of phones in the brief window they have them. Also, when the kids inevitably move back to tiktok, majority of them will leave these other apps installed on their phones, dormant and collecting in the background.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Why does Trump need to pretend to do something for you?

      Trump has your support no matter what. He will rape children but you’ll line up to vote for him.

      With that said he’s already in office. Your opinion is meaningless to him. He already got what he needed from you.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Stop trying to find reason in a situation devoid of reason. You’re clinging to that for personal comfort, if you feel like you can wrap it with a bow, you feel in control of it. You’re not.

        He’s a broken narcissist and a psychopath. His dad didn’t love him and told him so. He’ll spend every worthless day of his life trying to get his dead dad to say “I was wrong about you”, and of course, his dad is dead so that won’t happen (wouldn’t have anyway, as that guy was likely an even bigger piece of shit, just not born with money like trump was so didn’t reach the same heights).

        So ask yourself why you don’t realize the above. If there’s an end to this presidency, or if say he gets diagnosed with a terminal disease, there’s a non-zero chance he launches all of the nukes with the hope of a worldwide nuclear holocaust - because at the end of the day, if his life was ending, and you told trump he could press a button and be sure that nobody was laughing at him after death, posthumously convicting him of crimes or just pissing on his grave, he’d kill every single person on the chance.

        A stranger’s opinion is meaningless to him? Brother, it’s fucking everything to him.

  • WeUnite@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I did some research and now I know why Trump wants to “save” TikTok.

    https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-tiktok-courted-conservatives-before-trumps-win

    https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/tiktok-and-white-supremacist-content/

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/on-tiktok-misogyny-and-white-supremacy-slip-through-enforcement-gap

    https://www.counterextremism.com/press/extremist-content-online-tiktok-accounts-spreading-extreme-right-propaganda-and-glorifying

    https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/16/congress/tiktok-sponsor-trump-inauguration-party-00198825

    This one is especially damning:

    TikTok is spending $50,000 on an inauguration party honoring influencers who helped Donald Trump spread his campaign message, according to the party organizer — and it’s scheduled for Sunday, the deadline for the company to spin off from its China-based owner or be banned in the U.S.

    CEO Shou Zi Chew is expected to attend.

      • Nasan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        50k gets you an “I’ll see what I can do” .

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well yeah, it’s no secret that TikTok had a white supremacy problem. There was a researcher who discovered that they could make a brand new account and (by only interacting with certain types of content) get white supremacists on their For You page within 20 minutes. Algorithmic feeds are funny like that, because they just gauge engagement. The algorithm isn’t making any moral decisions on whether the engaging content is socially acceptable. For better or worse, it just goes “this person likes this content, so I’ll show them more.”

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That second paragraph is just vile. Donny brought this ban into motion and now they say he will save them?

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    209
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    And now Trump gets to be the one who saved TikTok, despite starting the process.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s an own-goal for Biden - an unpopular law that starts being enforced the day before Trump gets to stop enforcing it.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        91
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily. The server is still there, my wife logged in and saw the notice.

        It’s just theater.

        • vala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          $10 says Trump influenced TikTok to go dark today to make him look better when it turns it back on tomorrow.

          We all know they didn’t actually have to do this.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          65
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily

          Yup. In fact, Biden had specifically said he will not enforce the ban.

          Which, incidentally…might be the same thing Trump does to “unban TikTok” once he takes office. Which is bizarre, on both sides. Like…that’s literally not legal for a president to do. They can’t legally just ignore an Act of Congress.

          Not that the law matters in America anymore. The Supreme Court has pretty definitively seen to that.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

            the only thing the ‘president’ can do is extend the deadline by 90 days given evidence that the company is closing-in on a deal.

            with scotus out of the way, ruling in favor of trump’s initial desires, and that which subsequently passed through congress; it is now up to congress to undo the legislation if they so choose.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Not sure that is true though. When I read the law it specifies that the President can choose to block ANY foreign owned social media site that they (as in the president) deems a national security threat. So Trump could in theory say ban RedNote tomorrow and it legally would have to be done. That said… he may be able to just say “bytedance is not considered a national security threat at this time” and that may be enough to let TikTok continue to be in the U.S.

              I’d have to read it again to confirm

              Edit: nah ByteDance got targeted hard, no dodging that.


              DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

              Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

              (Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

              Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

              In practice, there’s no real mechanism to force it (especially if Congress is unwilling to impeach & convict). But legally speaking, the Take Care clause of the constitution obligates the President (through his executive) to enforce all laws passed by Congress. Ignoring it would be unconstitutional.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                LOL WTF does he care about the constitution? He’s a fucking felon. And clearly no one in government cares about the constitution either.

              • Kalysta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                When has trump ever cared about the constution?

                You’re talking about the guy who wants to end birthright citizenship.

          • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            The executive branch can selectively enforce laws, look at all the weed dispensaries the feds could just waltz into and have a federal case against everyone.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          TikTok and its service providers are liable. “No one is enforcing” is meaningless, because they can still be prosecuted retrospectively if the US Government changes its mind.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yup. They even asked for clarification on the “no enforcement” and the Biden administration basically just said “it is what it is”.

            What big company is going to take a risk like that?

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Not sure why you think it’s an own goal. Biden didn’t set the day for it to take effect, that was written into the law by Congress. You could say it was an own goal because Biden announced he wasn’t going to enforce it, but that seems to be the opposite of what you’re trting to claim And even with that decision to not enforce the law for 1 day before the Trump admin takes over, none of the companies TikTok works with like Apple or Google to list it in the app stores gave a shit about that lack of enforcement because of the uncertainty.

        Not to mention Trump being the start of the ban in the first place. He was President when all of this started to work it’s way through the process, even if Biden was the President when it actually made it through Congress, with bipartisan support. Trump only changed positions because he wants TokTok to pay him to continue to allow it to continue.

        • toddestan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well, it definitely looks to have backfired on US government. The politicians figured that they could force Bytedance to divest TikTok using a ban in the US as a threat, assuming that TikTok wouldn’t want to lose access to the US market and the 180 million or so (!) users. Instead of complying, ByteDance did nothing and the politicians and the US government were put into a position of actually enforcing a very unpopular ban.

          The timing of course is interesting. This comes right at the end of Biden’s administration, allowing for Trump to swoop in and lift the ban and take all the credit for that. Of course ignoring that is was Trump who originally kicked this whole thing into motion back in 2020 with his executive order to ban TikTok.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          16 hours ago

          More Americans have TikTok accounts than vote. For a shitload of normies who have only the vaguest notion of politics and current affairs, the app they’ve been enjoying gets cut off as the defining event of the waning days of the Biden administration. They are not going to care about how Trump tried to do it first, or it was bipartisan, or whatever. It’s hard not to see how this will cost Dems dearly.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            No it won’t. Biden is already out of office as far as normies are concerned. He has been since the election, but definitely within 24 hours of inauguration. TikTok stops working and the next thing they see is Trump having a huge party with a shit ton of pomp and circumstance for his inauguration as he gets into the White House. And then TikTok still doesn’t work when they open it up. Maybe he brings it back, maybe he doesn’t. Voters don’t pay enough attention to separate his inauguration and the TikTok ban happening 24 hours apart, they’ll bundle it together as one event.

            Unless he gets a massive cash infusion from Bytedance in the next 24 hours, he won’t give TikTok an extension on day one in office. He’s the kind of person that expects his payment up front.

            So everyone will instead see it stop working as President Trump takes over, and then it continuing to not work after. Some may give him the benefit of the doubt, but they weren’t ever going to vote for anyone else anyway, he’s their God Emperor President and they’ve confirmed their world view around him being perfect.

            Heck, he might try to spin it as some sort of promotional opportunity for Truth Social.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              The law isn’t being enforced. TikTok can just put it back up tomorrow and imply it was Trump that did it.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                15 hours ago

                That won’t stop Apple and Google from keeping it pulled from app stores until things are more concrete.

                TikTok only blocked access and put that notice up in the app after their partners decided that a statement from the outgoing administration 24 before the transition wasn’t enough for them to not comply with the law.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        As designed by the republicans. There are legitimate reasons to regulate tiktok, if Biden opposed though, they’d say he was a weak Chinese sympathizer, if he complied, they’d do this.

        It was a trap where you were fucked either way, as the republican think tank ghouls drew it out.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There’s still loads of bullshit surrounding the name. Hope your personal filters are up to the task the next 4 years.

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I know bad for democracy and everything but

    This app has done nothing positive for my life, arguably began my social media addiction, filled my brain with negative content at the height of COVID and severely impacted my mental health

    I don’t think governments should ban platforns. But do I think TikTok should have ever existed? No

      • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        it is a me problem

        you want to subject yourself to doomscrolling and unresticted data collection? go ahead. i dont give 2 shits

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yes, it’s a you problem that you can’t control how you interact with your glass rectangle.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It helped my spouse deal with medical trauma by finding content creators expressing similar experiences. It worked better than any of the support groups which often felt more hopeless and isolating.

      At this point though my spouse just hates instagram reels and how chaotic and pointless this is shaking out to be.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I dunno. Thanks to Black creators there, I learned about Tulsa, Rosewood, a lot about America indigenous culture, learned about the cops city protests and actions…

      Sounds like TikTok was very good for democracy.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I find Tiktok haters funny. Vast majority aren’t users, and when you do find a user and they disparage the content, it’s pretty obvious that it’s a them problem and not a tiktok problem.

        If you want tiktok to be cooking videos, just like nothing but cooking videos. If you want it to be about palestine, then like that content. If you want to be in MAGAtok, well that exists too. If you see nothing but thirst traps, that’s because those are the videos you actually fully watch. Your fyp page is just a mirror into yourself.

        The only haters I can agree with are the ones who say “too many ads”

    • Senseless@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      And yet most of it’s users are either to stupid or addicted to see the issue and just switch to RedNote, no questions asked. Which in turn nullifies the ban altogether.

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If not for TikTok Israel’s genocide would have gone unreported in Western media and censored on US social media.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t use TikTok but I knew plenty about Israel’s actions. It was all over the internet and plenty of news sources.

        • ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yeah because teens love opening the paper in the morning and reading about how Israel is “liberating” Palestine?