They did. They banned sending US Citizen data to adversarial nations including China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and/or Venezuela. It was all packaged into one vote and now that’s the law, for everyone.

They will be if they send US Citizens’ data to China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and/or Venezuela. Because that’s how the law which bans TikTok was written.

China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela

Actually, when they banned TikTok they also made it illegal for any country to send American data to any adversarial country including China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.

In fact, TikTok could just sell to an American Owner at this very moment and continue operating. They didn’t sell, though. Because they don’t operate for profit. They operate for gain as a hostile foreign military asset.

idgaf what the jeep tea has to say about anything ever, tbh.

It’s easy to convince people to do wrong if you convince them there is no right to be done.

That’s why Tankies are so hard to tell us both sides bad.

That’s about what I expect from Bannon, yeah.

TBH I don’t think Mangione did any good, but if Ryan Wesley Routh or Thomas Matthew Crooks had landed their shots then we’d be talking.

I’m not an advocate of secession under normal circuimstances, what with the looming threat of WWIII if ever the power scale tipped against the USA, but it’s especially a bad idea when California is covered in fire.

Unfortunately no because in 1929 the House of Representatives got capped at 435. For example, a Congressman from California represented 494,709 people while one from New Hampshire represented 3,448 people in the year 2020.

You know, this would be much more accurately captioned as a map of how a president could win with as little of the popular vote as possible. Lowest possible score is 21%.

The last time the USA claimed territory was at the end of WWII.

I wouldnt want to take a neutral stance here, if the USA is a 53 then China is a 87 on the badometer.

“Whataboutism” is when you dismiss any bad of any one thing because there are other examples of bad things. In fact, you trying to deflect your bias as my bias is actually also whataboutism.

If you don’t have any logical excuse for the bad thing, then you should stop standing up for the bad thing.

The year is 2038. Korean-Ukrainian food is a hit new global phenomenon, drawing tourism to the region of “Little Korea” in Ukraine where the sounds of accordion music fills the air and you can pose to have a statuette made. The people live in peace since they defected from the Russian invaders en masse.

Danke

No, I don’t I’ve never even heard of that shit but if its crypto then its a multiple digital ledger by definition. They all are.

Sure, fair stance, but also pure whataboutism.

HR 1 For The People Act - written by dems, passed by dems twice, blocked by Republicans.

Before that the dems wrote the campaign finance laws in 1995 and 2002 which were the core of the Citizens United Lawsuit in 2007 where SCOTUS voted with a partisan split to allow any sized contribution, even Hillary Clinton was a supporter of undoing Citizens United.

Even if the DNC isn’t your ideal peoples party, they are the party who can give you the option. Vote Dem.

NPR still one of the cooler ones, though.