I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    You know what I miss? Search engines that honored Boolean operators. I am often looking for niche results and being able to -, ! and NOT is incredibly useful. But that’s just not a thing anymore. I know part of it is that SEO includes antonym meta data that ruins this but it would still be helpful on occasion.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s not just you. At some point, search’s primary purpose went from “finding the information you’re looking for” to “getting paid to put links in front of you”. Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

  • Ark-5@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    4get.ca

    Has been very refreshing to use. It’s a bit slow, and you need to do a captcha periodically because they get hella bot spam. It’s got a clean interface, no sponsored results and other junk, and so far it’s felt like “old google” more than anything else. Plus they have my preferred color scheme as a built in option!

  • vividspecter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

    It helps that it gives actual sources, so you can verify them. But yeah, not helpful if all of the sources end up being AI posts.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I feel it is intentional. They are god damn good at hearing my talking about a baby and shoving all baby videos and social media post in every corner for ad revenue; yet when I search about something trivial I cannot get an answer.

    Even AI becoming useless the last couple of weeks compare to a few months back where it gave details answers.

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there’s not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

    Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Huh…Can’t replicate that claim (though I would believe it happening)

      On the 20th Sep. I asked my Google Home if it would be raining.
      It responded that it would rain. I asked when it would rain.
      Home responded with “Today it won’t rain.”

      Like what? 5 seconds ago you said it would. No weather report reports rain. Where did you get the first response from??
      And I could even replicate it (have it on video)

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I can’t get it to repeat it either but it was definitely an ai auto response thing from google ai overview or whatever it’s called

        Now it’s giving distance from burner and everything lol. It’s learning 👀

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And the AI is trained on the shitty search results. It just parses them many times faster than a human reader can, which does at least make it better at getting to the fucking point. Once paid advertising is fully integrated with LLM, it will be as shitty and useless as traditional search. And then the entire world will collectively hop to the next trend so it can get hyper-monetized/enshittified, too.

  • xChronoZerox@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Funnily enough I’ve found using an LLM to parce the data, then cross checking it’s source as well as my own sources to be superior to previous searches.

    It’s annoying to change the way you just mindlessly search, but if you’re upset by it just mindlessly search, end of discussion.