

Man, just for this false hope we should ban all AI forever.
Man, just for this false hope we should ban all AI forever.
Between my butt cheeks as it helps me stay fit by clenching my butt all day.
Also, in my roght pocket as I’m right handed and use my phone a lot.
Mark my words, a decade from now vibe coding won’t be a thing because it will literally be calked regular coding and there will like “coding experts” or some shit that would basically be normal programmers that are good at it. And they will be tge only ones that can really solve novel problems.
Or, AI will actually get to a point of being a real programmer and not a (very cool but still just a) tool.
But just to cover my bases, it might also be neither.
Welcome to my TED talk on how to never be wrong!
“Could social media bring us all together and help bridge disagreements?” Same shit, different decade.
And just to clarify, it most definitely can! Just not when it’s a for-profit-off-of-you model.
Personally I feel lije lemmy is a pretty good example of social media that doesn’t go off the rails as it grows
Not much, just don’t build it over theft.
Next they will try to “prove” to you that all triangles have three inner angles! Pfft, stop the religion of science!
I will make a 1/100 pound burger, instant money machine
Don’t worry! It’s only for 1 year and then you are done!
At least he is past the age of pooping on you!
Yeah but how would you see that?
Mostly porn as a kid, then actual research on my own. Sucks that sex ed is so ignored
4580515834270126 12/31 653
Oh man! How do I pronounce this?
“I bought this cleaver box of a car and it yearns for cleaving… Better continue driving it!”
This isn’t even my final form!
sheds penis and grows boobs
Also, Adobe totally fit the god image, as they are little peices of shit that like to torment those they have power over.
Calling steganography “Undetectable” is like a kid making a secret language that is just scrambled English words. Like yeah, it’s hard to decode and it is a secret, but it is detectable and it still needs a base to work (ie an already existing language or in this case actually executed code)
This is not news.
What do you expect? Half of these decision makers are complete idiots that are just good at making money and think that that means they are smarter than anyone who makes less than them. They then see some new hyped up tech, they chat with ChatGPT and they are dump enough to be floored by it’s “intelligence” and now they think it can replace workers but since it’s still early, they assume that it will quickly surpass the workers. So in their mind, firing ten programmers and saving like two million a year, while only spending maybe a few tens of thousands a year on AI will be a crazy success that will show how smart they are. And as time goes on and the AI gets better, they will save even more money. So why spend more money to help the programmers improve, when you can just fire them and spend a fraction of it on AI?