• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    224
    ·
    11 months ago

    theres a generation of kids who don’t understand basic directories because of the mobile market and never actually used a pc in a regular usecase.

    put in perspective, there are those who are more proficient on a touchscreen keyboard more than an actual keyboard.

    • youngalfred@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      153
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve also found (I’m a teacher) this generation is far less proficient at search. They (generalisation) type a whole question into Google, and read the Google created text box to get their answer, taking it as gospel - regardless of if Google has completely gone off the mark.

      Contrast this to a generation that grew up with needing to refine search terms with key words, who can find far more relevant info quicker.

      It’s hard to get them out of the rut and teach them to be more critical of sources. They’re so used to having what they need served straight up for them. LLMs (AI) are feeding into this more - they struggle to believe that AI hallucinations exist until I show them.

      Again all this is generalisation - when I say ‘they’ I don’t mean ‘all’.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        ·
        11 months ago

        Couple of years back I used to help this kid with computer related stuff, and it really baffled me how he was nearly computer illiterate. He had no idea what make his laptop was, no idea what OS he was on, or any of the specs.

        He called it a gaming laptop because he played games on it, but it was a pretty decent school/work thing without a dedicated GPU.

        I’d always envisioned the younger generations getting better and better with tech, but it makes sense that won’t be the case as tech moves to be easier to use, more reliable, and less intrusive.

        Modern iPads are nothing like the BS DOS/98 I grew up with.

        • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Similar thing happened with cars. My grandpa would take them apart and reassemble them. my dad (somewhat generalizing to generations a bit) were really into cars and engines and would do some basic diy. I know nothing about them and don’t care to learn much.

          I think computers are doing a similar thing. Millennials sit in the middle of the adoption and saw it emerge from more of a technology wild Wild West to being central to modern society. We could take the time to delve into details (since they mattered), but now it’s more taken for granted and things are there.

          I guess, I’m just thinking it’s some sort of technology adoption thing that naturally plays out in a “victim if it’s own success” way.

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would guess that’s it’s a combination of what you mentioned and also the generation rasing it not bothering to actually teach them properly about that sort of stuff. I never learned about car stuff, never had anyone to teach me. Now as an adult I know enough to do the basic oil change stuff but nothing more.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              Oh, that’s definitely happening when the five-years-away promise of fully self-driving vehicles as promised a decade ago make their appearance in 2050.

              • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Don’t forget they’ll be optimising the route to pass the store fronts of 3 paying businesses along the way.

          • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think the situation is also somewhat different with cars. Old cars used to be much simpler to take apart and tinker with than modern cars. Computers and operating systems are still just as easy to pry apart (since the fundamentals haven’t changed since the 90s lol).

            My theory is that as tech came to a wider appeal and became more user-friendly, more people are using it who don’t run into issues that need technical knowledge. Early OSes needed highly technical knowledge to use. Modern OSes can be operated by a monkey. Therefore, their inclination to learn about the computer is less because it just fades into the background.

            • Thwompthwomp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              I think you have some good points, but I’m not 100% sure I agree though. Modern computers are much more complex than earlier ones if the 80s and 90s. (I guess I’m ignoring the earlier VAXs and stuff and thinking more of personal computers.) I saw a keynote from an OS conference which was pointing out that there are very few actual os papers, as the hardware is so much more complex and actually multiple smaller os’s managing the various system on chip components.

              Also, Mac has over the years gone to great lengths to hide how things actually work. Like 5 years ago I remember getting really confused just attaching a debugger to a c simple C program I was toying with.

              At the end you say that OSs are so easy monkeys could use them, and I think that’s my point too. They intentionally get easier to use and fade into the background and don’t really encourage tinkering with the lower level stuff.

              You are correct that the basics of computers are similar and that’s why arduino and other microcontrollers are still basically the same as they were years ago, just the main difference I’ve seen is moving to more and more RTOS and trading off a bit of speed and memory, whereas a decade ago it was a lot more low level assembly optimization.

              Good points though! I appreciate them. I teach some computer engineering stuff and I think about a lot of this and how best to talk about some of the lower level stuff.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fr I think this is my problem with the new “advancements” and why I find myself more drawn to Linux as time passes. The “foolproof” of modern tech is also troubleshoot resistant and difficult as hell to do anything with.

          I often say I am lucky that I grew up in the narrow window between when computers became a household commonality and when running and repairing them was affordable, because in that narrow window it was learn or buy. Learn to fix it or shell out for a new one, and they weren’t stable enough for buy to be an option for most households for what was basically a toy. So fam being broke, I learned. I’m not in IT or anything (don’t have the credentials to get hired and entirely unwilling to get them when I already know how to do all the things, I’d rather be unemployed than spend more on worthless credentials… see? Millennial.) but I love running my own hosting and stuff, which means constant learning how to maintain. If I didn’t grow up at that exact time, would I bother, considering this isn’t a job for me and never will be? Probably not, honestly.

          I hated the iMac lockdown (and deleted the hard drive registries from every iMac I came across while it was an option to do so, essentially bricking every device I came across, because that’s just piss poor management to allow a group user to brick the entire device… 😅) I hate the windows forced-maintenance (11 doesn’t give a fuck what my active hours are, because I have them set to everything but a 6 hour span of morning when I actually won’t be using it. Still does updates mid afternoon, breaking everything I host on it until I’m home to confirm login even with all security disabled and resume settings enabled…)

          I just hate everything except DIY, and I grew up with that. It so difficult to get it to do what -you-want it to do without bowing to the overlords who dictate how it can be used and I’m so over it.

          (The swap off Linux was of necessity 2x, the Beast died due to mobo failure and I bought an off the shelf win tower to replace it, but also needed to run the VM for work and Linux couldn’t manage the niche client they went with… but now I’m not employed, buh bye windows! Nevah again.)

          • themz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            What is a hard drive registry? Or: a properly managed Mac can’t be bricked by a user 🤷🏻

      • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        11 months ago

        Unfortunately this generation google is getting less proficient at search as well. It’s like it treats the search term as a vague idea and any syntax as a non binding suggestion.

        • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          11 months ago

          And many sites use seo to attract traffic but dont have any content you are actually looking for. And ads.

        • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That is as much monetary as it is a response to consumers.

          I read an article a few weeks ago that - ironically - now I can’t find when searching for it, because all the search results are crowded by SEO blogspam. (Even though I’m using exact phrases I recall from the article!)

          The gist of the article was that while your search terms are displayed in the address bar, Google will opaquely substitute words, add ‘invisible’ search terms in that it doesn’t tell you it’s added, or otherwise alter its search metrics to return results that are more heavily laden with advertisements and/or sites that advertise with Google Ads.

          If a straightforward search no longer renders straightforward results, then there’s not a good feedback mechanism for users to learn how to be better at searching. We all are just getting rolled by the algorithm to look at advertisements.
          I imagine folks who remember when the internet was good will take this as Google now being bad, but folks who don’t/aren’t of that age will just assume the internet always worked poorly. It might be why LLM’s are acceptable as “AI” despite their flaws.

        • rustydomino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ask it esoteric questions on something you are intimately familiar with. Heck it doesn’t even need to be esoteric. I asked Bing who won the 2023 World Series and it confidently told me that it was Astros vs the Phillies that the Astros won in 5 games.

          • Cossty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            I asked Llama 2 the same question and here is the answer. Idk if it is acually right, I don’t watch sports.

            Sure! Here’s the answer to your question:

            According to the search results, the Texas Rangers won the 2023 World Series. They defeated the Arizona Diamondbacks in the championship series, winning four games to one.

        • youngalfred@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          I generally get ask it to provide sources for its work, and then show the students that most of the time those sources don’t actually exist.

          Like it’ll have a real author, and a real journal, but a fake article name that the author supposedly wrote.

          Or a real website that 404’s - once is fair enough, websites change, but when ten of the sourced websites are all 404s that’s not right. You also try to search for the article that’s meant to be on the website, but even the website doesn’t think it exists.

          I’ve even been in an argument with Bing where it was adamant that an article existed on a university website, and it shut down the conversation with me when I kept pointing out I couldn’t find it.

        • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Let it create a simple quizgame with easy question amd tell it to create some backround info on the correct answers.

          It will claim the wrong answer correct and tell you the opposite in the backround info quickly

      • HBK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        To play a devil’s advocate: could this be them learning how to use a search engine? When I was a young teen learning to use a computer for the first time I would type full on sentences into Google and not get any results.

      • Superwidget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Another teacher here. Teaching English for the first time. I didn’t realise their skills were this bad unless I saw with my eyes. Glad I’m not alone in this battle!

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m definitely better typing on my phone than I am on a kb on my pc. For reference I’m in my 30s

      • Hupf@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        On a phone, I can’t touch type, so full size keyboard always wins for me. However it was quite tedious to initially acquire that skill.

        • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I used to be good with my kb, then I graduated high school and only used my pc for gaming and videos, so I lost my typing skills within a year or 2.

    • voxel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      i can actually type slightly faster on a touchscreen keyboard, despite spending most of my time on my pc.
      typing special characters is painfully slow on touch keyboards tho

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    This has actually been studied. Turns out, zoomers are so reliant on smart technology like tablets and phones, they never actually learned anything about normal PC file systems or extensions. They literally don’t understand what a folder is because they’ve never been exposed to PC or Mac environments.

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I call bullshit on this post. Since Windows 10 you can just double click a zip file and it opens up like any other directory (even if it isn’t) and shows you the files.

    If this zoomer wanted to open it they’d obviously double click.

    So calm down boomers, this is fiction.

    • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If it’s an executeable with dependencies in the archive it might not run without being unpacked.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The greentext says “he asks for some files”, that doesn’t sound like an executable, which usually gets blocked by the mail system anyway (even in a zip, if there’s no password on it).

        But yeah, that is one way to have it broken, besides Windows refusing to run a random .exe

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            11 months ago

            Outlook blocks it by default so if you allow exe’s to be emailed… you’re pretty stupid.

        • MHanak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You can’t email exes, but once you zip it there is no exe, it’s a zip. If outlook automatically unpacks and scans the zip (which i doubt) you can always password lock the archive

          Edit: And my email them i mean attach them in outlook

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      They may have emailed it to the zoomer, and the zoomer attempted to open it on their iphone or something that doesn’t have native zip compatibility.

    • Stephen304@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe they downloaded the zip and then immediately tried to open it in a specific program through the open dialog giving them an error. I see similar mistakes with my parents - they have no concept of where files are, it’s just “on the computer” because they rely so heavily on “smart” file picker dialogs that show you everything recent or by a file type no matter where it’s actually located.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not super tech literare… Is there even a reason to unzip the files if you just want to grab one of them? I kust assumed windows is unzipping it into some weird temporary memory anyway to show me them, so a file is a file?

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean the file is zipped, as in compressed. So it might just look like a file, but if you open it inside the zip (with file explorer) Windows does have to decompress the file in the background to show it to you.

        Which is obviously slightly slower than if you unzip the file and put it somewhere and then open it, but you won’t really notice the difference except we’re talking about massive files.

        And of course if you make changes to the file you can’t save it (except to a new file) as it gets opened up as read only.

        If you just want to store the file and view it every now and then I don’t see a reason to unzip it. And you can always do that later anyway.

    • Astaroth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I call bullshit on this post. Since Windows 10 you can just double click a zip file and it opens up like any other directory (even if it isn’t) and shows you the files.

      Just the other day I had to tell someone to unzip first before they could patch the rom (they were going to play some romhack on an emulator); I don’t know how old they were but clearly there can be scenarios where someone has a zip file and don’t know what to do with it or use it.

      I don’t even know what the rom was or which emulator they were using, because I just told them if they google Rom Patcher JS that’s going to work for whatever file type it is, because according to them the problem was that the patcher they had didn’t work…

      But as it turns out they were trying to use the .zip archive as the patch file, so I then had to explain to them that they need to extract it first.

      And afterwards the patcher they had did work so I don’t think they even used Rom Patcher JS in the end.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s also more of a Windows issue than a user issue. I absolutely hate that file types are hidden by default in file explorer, makes the whole thing feel unusable. First option I change whenever I touch a Windows PC.

        So besides the icon you can’t see at first glance as a casual user that it’s a zip file. And a ROM most likely had an icon the user wasn’t used to, so they didn’t notice something was wrong :-/

        • Astaroth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Right, I forget about that every time until I’m reminded of it. It’s the first thing I change along with showing hidden files when helping someone. (Even if what they need help with is unrelated)

    • SpaceCadet
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Administrators can disable this, so I think the larger point is: if a tech literate person receives a zip file, they understand that it is in fact a compressed archive that can contain one or more files and directories, and that you need an archive tool to extract the contents, whereas a tech illiterate person doesn’t understand this and expects it to just be handled magically when they double click on it and are stumped when that doesn’t work.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Double clicking works for 99% of file types. So if I send you a pair of Excel files in a zip and you double click it under Windows 10 or 11, it will just show you the Excel files and you can even open them. Not sure what your point is here.

        • SpaceCadet
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Double clicking works for 99% of file types

          You’re completely missing the point.

          Not sure what your point is here

          The point is that when the double click magic doesn’t work for one reason or another, for example because the administrator disabled this feature with a group policy or because the file associations got messed up, the tech illiterate person does not know what to do because they don’t grasp the underlying concept.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s Chromebooks, phones, and tablets that you don’t ever have exposure to actual files. Chromebooks especially now that they’re so common in schools because they’re cheap.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I so wish Linux phones were actually a usable thing so that we could have functional pocket computers.
      The attempts made so far weren’t very convincing.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Unfortunately it’s not

          Phones also have the added benefit of needing the OS tweaked for every device

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              My point was more that the small community is fragmented further

              If Voila, Libre, Pine, etc were able to pass fixes upstream that all worked for the other then things would be in a better state

      • Ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly we probably can just somehow shove Linux components like flatpak and other stuff like the terminal into android, make them apks somehow so they can work whenever

        Of course this would be hard AF to do but I just want to run tik tok in a sealed off VM using flatseal goddamnit (I don’t trust it with my phone but I want to access the videos on it)

          • Ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, and then run a android emulator inside that and then use tik tok, reminds me of that attempt to run old Mac os on a Wii since they’re but PowerPC based, but it ended in a ton of conversions and it taking like 20 mins to click something, but it won’t be that bad probably

            Gonna mess with it once I get a new phone tho, can’t now since it’s filled with crap

        • KrapKake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You can do many Linuxy-terminaly things with Termux. I use it quite often. Write shell scripts in vim, run Python scripts, SSH, use ADB tools to manage other android devices, install and update things with pkg/apt, traverse your phones filesystem as you would in Linux, if you have root on your phone you can even do root stuff! Heck, you can even run neofetch! All that and more on your tiny little phone screen!

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Good point… they’re welcomed to tech with the same consumer goods and social media brain melting content as boomers. There’s no reason they would be more technical, if even on par.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Millenials are just passing on the abuse they got from the boomers for enjoying avocado toast 10 years ago.

      At least making fun of someone’s tech skills is rather harmless compared to questioning the basic desire to eat something other than ramen every now and then.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have seen multiple “zoomers” struggle with zip files. Probably because they dont know those from their smartphones.

      • WillFord27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Interestingly enough, the youngest zoomer is now 11. I’ve never seen an 11 year old struggle with a zip

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        How is it possible to struggle with them, pretty much all desktop OSes have built-in support for those and Windows even lets you treat them like folders.

        • Microw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think it’s because Windows treats them like folders. They don’t understand why things don’t work like normal but windows explorer displays them like normal folders.

          They have no concept of what a compressed archive is.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Weird, right? I feel like I grew up in the perfect generation, where I started with MS-DOS and Windows ‘95. We had to KNOW how things worked in order to get games and other software running. Had to know how to install, how to fix driver issues, how to configure things, etc. Even (re)install a complete OS.

    But tech these days ‘just works’. A lot of software is one click installs, with no real user interaction needed. And everything else is easily accessed on the web or a phone app. Windows itself is also much more reliable, so even that doesn’t require much knowledge.

    It’s made everything available to a much wider audience, but it also means people don’t need to develop actual skills in this area. A good example is my dad. He never figured out how to do things on our Windows ‘95 PC, but he loves his iPad because it’s so easy toddlers can use it.

    • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You had to prove you were worthy to play the game by resolving IRQ conflicts and figuring out how to squeeze every spare byte out of HIMEM.SYS. Sometime it was more challenging than the actual game.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        And let’s not forget that ‘system requirements’ were more like ‘system suggestions and challenges’. Especially when your parents bought ‘a computer’ with hardware specs that basically read ‘hard drive, memory, soundcard, CD-ROM drive’.

        So when configuring things, there was some trial and error involved in figuring out what the software could attempt to configure in order to work with your specific thing. It’s not like today where us gamers pick the exact hardware down to the RGB-infused RAM.

        And few things were plug and play prior to USB. You know how shitty printers are now? Try wrestling with one of those on a fucking parallel port.

    • jawa21@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nothing quite like having to learn to edit config.sys in order to make something work with no internet or references at all.

      • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Camping out at the library with whatever computer magazines they had in the reference section taking notes or using your last dime to make a copy because god forbid your parents would waste money on a subscription to BYTE or something.

    • jawa21@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nothing quite like having to learn to edit config.sys in order to make something work with no internet or references at all.

        • ch00f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Doing my first linux install on a main PC (after a decade of managing a headless server). Honestly, getting the trackpad to scroll at the right speed has been something of a hobby of mine lately.

          • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Meanwhile on Windows, you leave everything on default and deal with it.
            For me, Linux isn’t a time sink cause nothing works right out of the box, but because everything can be optimized.

            • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Linux Mint is really just the easiest for people who want to leave everything on default. If you ever want to get into Linux, I would recommend checking out Mint. Literally anything is better than WIndows.

        • Twig
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s not 2007 any more.

        • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          most “just works” distros have really intuitive installers though, I’d even say it’s easier than windows, if not for the mandated Microsoft bullshit on all computers by default like secure boot and TPM

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          “First boot is so much quicker than Windows!”

          “Wanna talk about the setup that comes after that to get everything working as it should?”

          “Oh no, we don’t talk about that.”

            • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              You could but it takes the fun out of Arch. Okay maybe if your at your tent installation of arch or you already known how Linux works yeah it makes sense but if you want to learn it’s not the most optimal

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I butt chug Panera charged lemonade, by the way.

      • jinarched@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I feel lots of people don’t realize how Linux is much easier to use nowadays. Most people I talk to seem to assume they need to learn how to use the terminal, but really they just can do everything by using the GUI.

        I agree with you. I currently dual boot, but once windows 10 is not updated anymore, I’ll just use Mint and go Microsoft free. It’s less bloated, no telemetry, most games work flawlessly to perfectly (with proton it will just get better) and most applications needed are easily found in the software manager and are for the most part open source.

        • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Also most problems have already been asked on forums, reddit or Lemmy so it’s not that hard to fix problems.

  • telllos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    We asked an intern to write a lettre for a RMA, and he printed the letter, we tell him what he has to modify. He is like “I have to type all this again” “What do you mean lil intern?!?”. Intern deleted his file after printing it. O.o

    • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Even then they could’ve used Google lens or some other OCR thing. Hell, today I might even ask chatgpt to do that

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Even the they could’ve used Google lens or some other OCR thing

        That’s because no one tries to fix their problems anymore. Being computer literate isn’t necessarily about how you always know what you’re doing. It’s just about been able to work around your knowledge limitations and also being prepared to actually try.

        This morning the server at work went down and even though it’s not my responsibility to deal with it, they asked me to take a look. I had absolutely no idea what was wrong with the damn thing except that it’s old and naff, but I tried turning it off and on again and that didn’t fix it, so you know what I did? I googled the error message, literally anyone else could have done that but no one did. It turned out that all I had to do was change a 1000 into a one in a 1 in a config file. Real advanced stuff.

    • 1847953620@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because they’ve managed to have minimalistic aesthetics burned into their identities to a toxic degree. Icons bad.

  • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I have yet to meet the braindead skibidy rizz zip file zoomers everyone keeps talking about. I assume I’ll find them with the latte avocado toast millennials.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’d be surprised.

      The thing is they tend to be in the same avenues as where you’d encounter tech illiterate people of every other generation too.

      While there is a degree to which there’s age barriers, it was more a thing going from no computers at all to computers.

      Nowadays age means less in terms of tech competency than things like socioeconomic background, professional background, and general interest.

      Sports kids in HS who grow up to go into a nepotistic position at a construction business doing sales have roughly the same tech competency if they were born in 1970 or 2000.

    • archon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’ve met them. But I’ve also met tech illiterate millennials. And genius boomers.

      I don’t have enough data to conclude yet, so options are open. I do believe zoomers use computers less than millennials do tho, in favor of smartphones.

      • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        As far as I can tell boomers know how a computer works and don’t know how to do this weird thing they need to do for some reason or they break it in a weird way. Zoomers seem to be a mixed bag of no IT knowledge or never needing help. Everyone else just drops the laptop and lies about it.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I worked as tech support for a patient portal at a previous job and found that a lot of both boomers and zoomers use their smartphones exclusively. The bulk of our calls were from boomers and trying to teach them to navigate a smartphone over the phone was one of the most frustrating things I’ve ever had to do.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Explaining them how to navigate a computer over phone is even worse.

          Had to explain for 15 minutes to some old guy where the location of the start button was.

    • stockRot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      I work in tech and all of the recent hires (Gen Z) are domain-general smart: they have great critical thinking skills, can reason through a problem abstractly, and pick things up fast.

      But damn can some of them not use a computer in an efficient manner. Having to walk them through changing display settings or how to set up Outlook rules or basic keyboard shortcuts is a little painful.

      As someone who, nowadays, uses his phone for pretty much 98% of all computing tasks, I get it. But it’s still painful

  • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    Every generation complains how much worse the next generation is.

    It’s all a lie to make old people feel better about themselves declining with age.

    We need to join the generations into one super generation. Why do we let people pit ourselves against each other? Father vs son, mother vs daughter, grandma vs nephew and so on…

    Time to combine the bitterness and resentment of the older generations with the can do attitude of today’s youth and inflate the numbers with gen x who will just act as fillers.

      • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The lack of curiosity is what kills me though. The amount of effort it took to figure things out that I didn’t know was far and away more effort than it would take to search with google how to open the associated archive. This has been something I’ve read up on also and I wonder if the intuitive spoon feeding of technology also impedes one’s willingness to tackle the easiest obstacles even if the solution is a literal search away. It feels like offloading their ignorance which rubs me wrong.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          Agree. I thought the future would be like Star Wars because everyone would understand computers.

          NOPE!

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I mean historically humans have been known to not keep records on our old technologies so it wouldn’t be very far fetched for us to end up in a situation where we don’t have the knowledge of how to build only maintain.

            • Donebrach@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Case in point: at an old job of mine we had two ancient (probably 70 year olds) on as consultants because a vital computer system was operating on COBOL and the two dudes were the 1) literal architects of the system and 2) only people who still knew COBOL (or at least the iteration the system was built in).

              I know that the vital system has since been replaced (although I guarantee old data is still in the legacy system) and that there were probably other people alive that could be brought on in theory, but we live in the real world and not a magical video game where experts are hirable by simply offering 100 xp points and 800 (money)… although it seems that reality is becoming more and more normalized.

        • stewie3128@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not the next generation that sucks. We suck for having made them this way.

          I’ve noticed it a lot in my younger extended family: When something goes wrong, they wait for someone to tell them what to do next, rather than doing a rudimentary amount of googling to get the answer. I can imagine a few explanations (with the caveat that we are not talking about the top 1% of the class here):

          1.) Learned helplessness. They feel they aren’t expert enough in anything to be able to rely on their own industry or facilities to figure something out.

          2.) Learned helplessness by coddling from authorities. Education has gone so far in the direction of teaching-to-the-test, that they are certain that anything they are confronted with should have been fully explained and taught to them ahead of time. When a .zip file appears in a workplace setting, and no one has officially told them in the workplace setting how to handle a .zip file, they “go find an adult.”

          3.) Purely applied-education, foregoing theory entirely. I am suspicious that, for example, teaching algebra through real-world application actually limits the students to using algebraic principles only when those specific real-world applications arise. I would love to run an experiment wherein you never told the students why they needed to know how to figure out 2x+3=5, and see if they are better able to apply such principles outside of school since they themselves would be the ones coming up with the situations to test out whether what they learned could help. Sort of like going back to phonics, instead of whole-language. I learned how to count to 10 in Spanish from Sesame Street songs that just (to my spacey young mind) popped up out of nowhere, with no accompanying explanation about when/where I was supposed to use this knowledge.

          Essentially, I guess, my contention is that American K-12 (and, I think, college) schools are turning into concentrated animal feeding operations, where kids are not allowed to turn around in their cages, and are spoon/force-fed the specific nutrients that testing quotas demand on the other end. They learn and live in an environment of hyper-surveillance, which they are repeatedly told keeps them safe. They are not confronted with novel situations where they have to teach themselves how to apply what they have learned, because they are increasingly kept in a completely controlled environment.

          I’m not saying that everyone needs to emerge at age 17 a scholar enjoying a completely un-alienated life of the mind, but I do think that we are actively NOT teaching kids how to think on their own, by the very nature of trying to teach things in the most relevant way, and in the safest-possible environment. Our good intentions are inhibiting the educational development of those who come after us.

          So, to reiterate my original thesis, it’s not that the next generation sucks. We suck for making them this way.

          • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is always important to remember. That new generation was in biggest part formed by us.

            They don’t suck because they’re dumb or whatnot. They were taught to go a very streamlined way, and that way they go. This concern has actually been raised long ago, by Bradbury of all men, if I recall correctly. Zoomers are not the first, millenials already lack a lot, and it only gets worse with the new generation. We need to figure out a way to manage the next generation in a way that would break the vicious circle.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re also on average more creative/adept with the tech they do use though. Lots of youngins are great at making little edited videos and stuff with their phones and tablets and programs they have on hand.

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I would caveat that with: “great at making little edited videos *using the pre-packaged templates in the apps”, which is kinda like equivocating a full free-form creation to a paint-by-number.

          If course, this does not apply to all creative youngin’s, and if anybody implies that I was painting every youngin with my broad brush, I’ll fight ya!

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The previous generation: “We use to go out and beat up n#####s for fun on a Friday night.”

      My generation: “Maybe stop calling them that.”

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    11 months ago

    Behold the difference between the generation growing with Win98, where everything was manual and accessible and doing it wrong could mean a manual install, and the generation growing up with iPhones, where you’re not allowed to change anything whatsoever.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ease of use. Don’t worry about the man behind the curtain. Just stare at your tik tok

      • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve been teaching my gen Z coworkers about stuff. They are good kids, we should try and learn them a thing or two ❤️ They’re not all lazy brain dead kids. They kind of look up to us elder millennials.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s because all they know how to use are iPads. They don’t actually understand how real computers work.

    Plus of course there is this attitude that if it doesn’t immediately work on its own you should give up and just pray to the nebulous entity that is “IT people”.

    You wouldn’t believe how many people get annoyed that I don’t know what their password for something is.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      For me it’s recovering my boss’s files from his broken mac.

      I have decades of experience in Linux. I can invoke the recovery shell and rsync his files onto a USB stick. But save that locked down OS? No idea. I’d have to watch a video and hope I don’t make a mistake.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        The thing with Mac is, it’s easy if you set it up correctly and if you haven’t set it up correctly (as in you have left it in default mode), it’s borderline impossible.

  • stebo02
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Gen Z at uni here. Most of my fellow zoomers know what a zip file is. But some people just don’t computer that much so they simply don’t know.

    However if you’re doing a computer job and you don’t know that’s ridiculous.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Some intro college CS courses have had to start teaching things like how folder structures work because enough students are missing that basic information.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I used to balk at this, but after much thought, it actually makes sense. Phones, tablets, and much of the user experience with personal computers is very far removed from file management these days (if you can even do that on your phone).

        Back before 2010, we could conflate the idea of “computer owner” with “computer literate”. And even for smart phones of the time, that was mostly true. Now, not so much.

          • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            In principle I agree. In practice, no.

            Personally, I don’t have the energy to keep hacking my phone after each security update from the manufacturer. And you kinda/sorta need those.

            Now, if there was a way to steamroll over the native OS for a Pixel or iPhone with something free that’s also current and well maintained, that would be better. At least that way I could have full control and use the hardware until the battery is well and truly dead.

    • Koordinator O@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Someone doing one of those computer jobs here. In the office i work we are 13 people. six zoomers, five boomers and two millennials. 12 out of these 13 people struggle to understand basic computer things such as archives even when I explane them. the same for family and some friends. I live and work germany. From my small sample i’d read its not a zoomer or boomer thing in germany at least.

      It is a missed duty of politics to bring the country into tune with this. For example the “IT class” back in school was teached from people who had to google the stuff they had to teach… if the’d knew how to google. I had to listen to many calls mid lesson where the teacher had to ask other people how stuffs done. And just as germany has failed to do this, there are isolated groups or bubbles all over the world that simply do not want or are able to learn it. and that’s just spreading slowly since there is no need to learn on most systems anymore.

      But that is just an observation of me with like I said just a smal sample in my close area. I could totaly be wrong.

  • ThePuy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    We Millennials were born in a sweet spot where PCs were widespread enough to be virtually in every house since childhood but also not too streamlined and simplified.

    We had a pc that sometimes didn’t work properly, we had to use the command line from time to time, troubleshoot and look up errors. When something fails we try to find out why and only after a while we give up and claim it’s an error or look for help.

    Also you know, stupid people are in every generation.

  • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There are tech illiterate people in every generation, but they definitely seemed more prevalent in the boomer generation. In my experience it’s Boomers > Gen X > Zoomers > Millenials in terms of most to least technologically incompetent. Always suspected millennials are usually more comfortable with tech because they grew up with it, and it grew up with them.

    For older generations, especially boomers, I figure they were more set in their ways and for many (but not all, obviously) it was hard to adapt. For Zoomers, I think it was just assumed that they’d just be inherently good so there were many things they were never actually taught (though many of them learned for themselves because they are nerds, which is pretty great if you ask me). Anyways, that’s my theory on generational tech literacy.

    • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m a xennial, and i think one of the key characteristics of my generation is that we grew up with tech becoming omnipresent, but it was also non user friendly tech.

      We started having PCs young, but we really had to know how to build our systems, it was much less plug and play. We grew up with visual OSs, but configuring that shit was not intuitive at all. Or outright broken (looking at you Win ME). We had to troubleshoot, fix, learn, read and test just to get our tech working.

      Younger generations grew up with tech omnipresent yes, but tech that mostly works intuitively - you barely ever have to really figure shit out, fix it or reconfigure it.

      Just my 2 cents!

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, once we had invented proper tablets and smartphones, those things are so intuitive that I have seen videos of monkeys figuring out how to use them.

        We got the sweet spot. Having to know how to program the VCR and cable boxes gave us a leg up on troubleshooting, and DOS just sealed the deal. Never thought I would be thankful for all those frustrating days.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          Anybody else here remember being the kid that knew how to set up VCRs for their grandparents and parents? LOL

          I learned how the cables worked so that I could get my NES to work on the TV. Sometimes you’d have to wire it through the VCR and so I learned how the VCR worked. Then I was a wizard to the old people

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          That is about the only animal testing I approve of.

          Can’t wait for companies to put “So easy to use, even a monkey could do it” sticker on their tablets.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        To add in to it, a lot of the experience during the formative years was with desktop computers. Consoles were there, but had far less capabilities. Handheld devices were generally more expensive compared to today and worse to use.

        So you’ve got a case where young adults today have to work on a computer platform completely foreign to them while young adults 20 years ago usually had 5 - 10 years experience as a user on that platform.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        A lot of current users aren’t ever exposed to the underlying tech. They only use a few applications. The ideal device for them is a tablet (or a ChromeBook). They know next to nothing about files, networks, most aspects of hardware (except the bling factor, maybe).

        It’s both a good and a bad thing.

      • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I have two older siblings that are xennials, and I would say people born from about the late 70’s to the early 90’s represent the peak of technological literacy. It’s almost like a bell curve… the further you get away from each end of that range, the more technologically incompetent (on average) people are.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my social circle, none of the 15-25 hav the slightest idea how to work a computer (no, wait, there’s one out of the six or seven). So they all come to the nearly 60 year old me that has to explain to them again what a directory is.

      • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, not being able to touch-type on a keyboard seems to be a skill many don’t develop/aren’t taught too. Basic stuff just gets skipped over because it’s just assumed young people are good with tech (probably a holdover from raising millennials)

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          The typing thing is interesting. I’m old enough that I learned to type on an IBM Selectric typewriter in the early 1990s (we had Apple IIs in the “computer lab” - but there were two rooms full of typewriters for this class). I did well in general in high school, but I took typing much more seriously than many other classes, because I hadn’t yet learned it on my own, and I knew how useful it would be in life. My classmates thought I was nuts (again, I’m sure). But that was one high school class that definitely did help me in “the real world”.

          So now, despite the ubiquity of computers, it seems they aren’t teaching typing.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I’m Gen X and credit playing video games for most of my self-taught knowledge on how computers work. My first computer was an Apple IIe, which didn’t require much more than putting disks in and typing startup commands, but when we got a Windows 3.1 PC next, I had to learn about file systems and troubleshooting when things inevitably went wrong. To this day, most of the computer stuff I’ve learned was from trying to get games working.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          And the limited experience I have with Linux is from getting my Raspberry Pi working. I even posted about having a problem and learned about “sudo.” (it worked)

    • telllos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know, I had my dad on the phone the other day. He was explaining his backup routine and rotation between two different location. He is 65, worked most of his life with unreliable OS. Sensitive hard drives, floppies etc. He know how to make sure his data is safe.

      • DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are absolutely boomers who are well versed in tech, shit some of them helped invent it, but there’s definitely a trend of boomers in general being tech illiterate.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      GenXer here. I’m not tech illiterate, except when it comes to social media. Then it’s more of a Luddite thing, because in 2007-8, I worked with early Facebook APIs (graph bullshit) and developed a deep hatred for Zuckerberg and his shitty website.

      I think the nerdy Gen X are a lot more technical than the nerdy Zoomers because we had to know more to use early PCs as kids. But it also meant a lot of us didn’t get into it until a bit later in life (or to make a Buck before the various don’ dot-com bubbles burst).

      • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m gen z and I’ve noticed the same thing. Nearly all gen z use computers, but because its so accessible and simplified they are nearly all tech illiterate.

        The people most knowledgeable about tech that I’ve met have been gen x. A lot of them are unfortunately some of the least knowledgeable though because they had no experience with computers until later in life.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Gen X built the Internet you’re using actually, and most of the server infrastructure that runs the world.

          • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            A select few, sure. But as far as I’ve noticed, Gen X (especially the older half) are like Boomer-Lite, and not just from a technological-literacy standpoint, either.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        GenXer here. I’m not tech illiterate, except when it comes to social media.

        Same. It’s funny that the things that come naturally to Zoomers are intimidating to me and vice-versa. Of course, a big part of that is that I didn’t grow up with social media and therefore have no interest in it (except for message board style things like Lemmy.)

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    They use magic that just works. They don’t need any understanding of the processes because things are so user friendly they never had a rigorous cleansing through fire in order to figure out where things were broken like Gen X had.

    If you think it’s bad now wait until AI destroys all the entry level skills and it becomes impossible to get experience to master something that AI can’t do.

    • TheMechanic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      “The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment” – Warren G. Bennis.