• anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You don’t win an election just with vibes.

    Kamala didn’t bring as much substance as what the left electorate was expecting from her, and couldn’t differentiate herself from Biden and the current term she is serving under. The whole democratic party went under because all they promise is vibes compared the current economical struggles people are facing.

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The truth is the dems are a right wing party now, they’ve been dragged there by the rethugs… and people Want to vote for an Actual left wing party, but there literally isnt one in the US.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The poison of the “big tent”. Move a little over to let people in enough and you are no longer representing anyone in a desperate attempt to represent everyone.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I guess this just goes to show what everyone is saying.

    The left is shooting themselves in the foot. People care about immigration and the left won’t solve it. So they lose power, that’s democracy in action.

    If the left want wants they need to listen to the concerns of the people.

    • grue@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      50 minutes ago

      People care about their economic well-being (which “the immigrants” are just scapegoats for) and the liberals abjectly refuse to do anything about that.

      But that still doesn’t excuse anybody flushing the rule of law down the toilet.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        But that still doesn’t excuse anybody flushing the rule of law down the toilet.

        Did i say it did?

        People obviously care note about immigration than that. That’s how high of a priority it is I guess.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Economy

    This is Trump’s economy, you idiots. This is the fallout from his incompetence and malice. But heaven forbid voters understand basic principles which rule their lives.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s the pattern in American politics that has existed since I was born: Republicans fuck the economy, Democrats do their best to fix it, people blame the Democrats for the bad economy and elect Republicans who fuck it up even more.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 hours ago

      i think you give too much credit to Trump. the economy has been rigged against the working class for a long time. it’s just getting progressively more brutal which makes people feel increasingly insecure.

      an insecure working class elects strongmen who promise simple solutions

      • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The best, simplest summation I’ve seen. Thank you. I’ve been searching for something to make sense of it and this is definitely it. Being forced into voting for the “least worst” candidate obscures where that path is headed by either candidate.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, sorry, but you don’t get to say that four years later.

      The economy got trashed in his last year… but remember how the sparse economic relief that were carried through the democratic congress got completely wiped out as soon as Biden took office? When the democrats took away the child tax credit childhood poverty doubled overnight. And you may say the cause of the inflation was Trump’s mismanagement (And it wasn’t. The supply chain breakdown would have happened no matter who was in office.) what was the democratic response? Fucking Chicago school.

      What’s happening is the US empire is not so slowly rotting and material conditions are deteriorating. That’s independent of what party is in power. But both parties are wedded to capital. And voters are hopping from one foot to the other while standing on that hot skillet trying to find relief. You’re not going to find it without overthrowing capitalism. This is the barbarism we were warning you about.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And it wasn’t. The supply chain breakdown would have happened no matter who was in office

        if i remember correctly, COVID brought our inflation up to roughly 6%. then the Ukrainian war took it the rest of way where it peaked near 9% (over 10% in my home state)

        these things would have happened anyway, although choosing to prolong the Ukrainian war as long as possible most definitely increased inflation. people think we only gave 2 or 3 hundred billion, but realistically the American public has paid more than a trillion in the invisible tax that is inflation. hundreds of thousands of layoffs because of higher interest rates are also connected to this

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Let’s not forget that a large part of the inflation, and especially on food and housing, was driven by pure greed and opportunism from the capitalists that control those basic necessities. And that’s something that could have been prevented with tools that capital permitted under Ronald Fucking Reagan.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            it’s an eternal battle. every once in a while we pass legislation to try and reign in corporate power. like for example the anti trust act in the early 1900s

            the issue is that public attention is temporary. eventually we move on to the next crisis and people forget. grow complacent.

            corporate interest, however, is eternal. it’s persistent and never gives up. it keeps pushing, infallibly, in order to weaken the structures meant to reign in their power. whether by legislation/policy (AT&T and friends unilaterally killing Net Neutrality some years back, Disney signing into law expansion of copyright, etc) or through more subtle methods (buying politicians and getting people into positions of power that have no intention of enforcing the laws)

            this is inevitably what happens with every democracy. eventually the vigilance fails and the structures of power are hijacked by opportunists.

            although having said all that, I don’t think greed had much to do with the inflation we saw. Sure, some companies took advantage and raised prices more than they needed to just to inflate that extra juicy profit margin.

            but realistically we’re headed to war and war means massive government spending which means inflation

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You’re separating government from the capitalists and I don’t think that’s an accurate way of looking at the world. Capital will eat itself even more voraciously than it does right now without some mediating force on itself. Government isn’t a hedge against capitalism that mediates its excesses. It is a PART of capitalism that mediates its excesses. The anti-trust act wasn’t for us; it was for them.

              But the reality that capitalism is a fundamentally unstable system can’t be fixed by blunting it. And as the rate of profit goes down, the very restraints that capital put on itself to ensure its survival must be destroyed in pursuit of that profit.

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s the advantage of the 2 party system. There is no other way out except revolution. In most European countries there is still an irrational but valid hope for regular reform through regular political means. Those countries are fated to linger on like this a little longer.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Worse: Congress purposely intended for the president to not have direct control over the economy.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Right, but the administration’s actions typically get attributed to the president, plus the president does have a measure of control through executive orders, or proposals which get carried through the house and Senate. The president will obviously sign any initiative that they themselves proposed.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I love how Economy is a high priority, yet they voted for the asshole known being the genius behind several bankruptcies. “The economy isn’t doing good, clearly we need someone who can fuck shit up to make it work!”

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Unironically, I think that was the thought process.

      Hard to vote for someone who is telling you all is well and the people that got the country here are competent and mean well, when the country is going through 5 different crises, all preventing you from living a decent life.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          She didn’t have to defend it. This was an election to run over Biden until he was just a pile of goo. She could have came out with some strong contrasting policies, instead she gave some great sound bytes for Trump.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s simple, and history has borne this out many many times.

    In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics if you’re the candidate of change. There’s a reason why Harris spent two months repeating memes instead of defending Biden’s policies, because it’s impossible to defend the fact that you had four years to rule and there are more people working 2-3 jobs just to survive.

    They knew they needed to appeal to workers. Instead, they spent most of the campaign repeating this meaningless platitude about joy to people who are being worked to death.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics

      That’s no excuse for electing someone whose stated policies and politics will fuck the economy even further and faster.

      • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        Sure it is, if you don’t understand economics, which few Merkins do. The evidence is right in front of us.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Also, there were plenty of people who were never going to vote for a woman, no matter what.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I’m sure that’s true too, but that’s not the reason she lost, and Democrats will continue to stack losses if that’s the narrative that they go with.

        Democrats haven’t been ceding male voters to Republicans for 16 years because they hate women. It’s because, in the liberal and activist communities, it’s become customary and accepted to treat men like shit.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s because, in the liberal and activist communities, it’s become customary and accepted to treat men like shit.

          this is just as dumb as the opposite “they didn’t vote for Kamala because she’s a woman”

          people don’t like Kamala because she’s an extension of Joe Biden and Biden has been a failure. that’s why she lost. she offered status quo when people want change. the DNC is incapable of changing quick enough to avoid fascism

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Plenty of people will also never vote for a black man, but that worked spectacularly for the Democrats the first time.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If that’s why Kamala lost, then explain why Tammy Baldwin is winning Wisconsin and Elissa Slotkin is winning in Michigan.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Then maybe don’t force a woman onto the ballot in “the most important election of our lifetime”. I’m all for progress, but you don’t win elections by forcing ideals upon people who won’t have them, and if this was truly the most important election of our lifetime, then the Democrats should have fielded their most appealing candidate.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Yeah if the DNC really gave as much credence to the vote power of racism and misogyny as they do when complaining about election losses, then why would they deliberately step on that landmine by selecting kamala only 8 years after HRC? It’s not like we think idealistic dreamers run the DNC right? That’s silly.

          Why did Dems lose the Senate? Keep the house? Cuz its more than just Harris here… What we’re seeing is voter repudiation of the last 4 years.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Healthcare: 8%

    That explains why americans in America are provided with less(no at all) healthcare than american tourisis in fucking Russia.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      This is what happens if any foreigner for example breaks bone in Russia:

      1. Emergency, including emergency specialized, medical care is provided to foreign citizens in case of sickness, accident, trauma, poisining and other cases requireing emergency treatment. Such medical treatment provided by state and municipal healthcare organizations is free of charge.
      • rarbg@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Specifically, state and municipal? Is there some other form of healthcare organization that can provide medical treatment?

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Because too many people are selfish and think that things are bad so might as well make them worse.

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think we have to accept that the American electorate actually wants fascism.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s more that Harris did such a terrible job that even the other side being literal Hitler didn’t save her.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Bro, in don’t care how bad Harris is/was. If you prefer trump to her, it’s on you.

        As always, mathematically not voting is equivalent to voting for the winner, since it’s a vote that didn’t change the result. So yeah. The above statement rings true.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          8 hours ago

          As easy as it is to blame voters, the American electorate didn’t want fascism. That’s just false. Harris dug her own grave by actively discouraging voters who didn’t want fascism. This electorate is the same one that elected Biden in 2020 and (mostly) the same one that elected Obama in 2008 and 2012. They just wanted a real candidate and Harris wasn’t that.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Leftist fascism is called fascism, because the term leftist doesn’t actually mean anything but fascism and communism do.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        They elected the candidate backed by Russia, which is still the shining beacon of a global superpower for the Tankies out there. So I guess Trump is a perfectly fine representative of fascism, left or right.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Why is there such an obsession with immigration?

    Do you want to pick strawberries? It’s back-breaking and sucks.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Thinking back to the one debate he had with Harris, Trump blathered nonstop about immigration. He talks about it like a wave of moorish invaders sweeping across the land, pillaging. This is obviously a powerful Image if you can get people to believe it. And in some areas people have been feeling like American culture is giving way to Mexican culture as the population in their home towns shifts, so Trump’s rhetoric taps into something that was already there. And if we’re honest, border policy is a weird zone where many of the laws don’t make intuitive sense. America talks out of both sides of its mouth on the issue, historically. A lot of people are here illegally whom we depend on utterly to staff our economy. So their presence is in some way sanctioned, tolerated, but not fully legitimized in law. When someone comes along and articulates one clear direction on immigration, it sounds like someone is speaking clearly for the first time. Even if that direction is stupid, hateful, xenophobic, and economically unviable.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I hear what you’re saying. What boring people to be afraid of novel cultures.

        Anyway, fine, close the border and make it so only US citizens can do all the labor nobody wants to do. Watch how much doesn’t get done; the economics behind work and such don’t change rapidly. I’ll bet most small farmers get destroyed with fields full of rotting, previously ready to harvest crops because nobody can offer a citizen enough to do the work, in a way that still yields a profit.

        The billionaires with factory farms and prison labor will likely win out again.

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Never liked that argument. It’s essentially “Why, don’t you like immigration, dummy? Don’t you know immigrants are easily exploited to do hard labour cheaply?”

      I’m not saying it isn’t true, especially in the west, but in my eyes, there are much more moral arguments for immigration.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I agree that it’s low-hanging… nope. Bailing on that one.

        I do think quality farm work is critical for our health as a nation, and I don’t mean economically.

        Can we automate it? Maybe. Till then, someone’s gotta do it, and for those who go into it, there’s gotta be a floor on job quality, seemingly basic things like bathroom and water breaks.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Conservatives don’t care about that sort of morals. They only care about what affects them directly. Maybe that means they can’t find tomatoes or apples one day. Then they’ll blame some Democrat for the problem.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They’re convenient scapegoats that can’t defend themselves. “Look, it’s a witch! Burn it”

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They’re different, even if they’re very similar. The important part is that they look different, too, because if you talked about all the white immigrants taking the white-collar jobs people would have to actually think beyond just a face-value assessment. Brown is bad is a lot easier than person over there could be anything so I need to talk to them and form even a basic relationship with them to figure out what’s going on and by then I might not be able to hate them so absolutely.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well they’re all lazy criminal welfare queens who are also taking all of our jobs somehow, don’t you read the right wing propag- I mean, news?

        • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Being different is scary enough for those that lack education (either willingly or due to circumstances out of their control)

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Apparently I can’t curse at you & your low energy understanding of the world, last comment removed.

        I stand by what I said before, I believe all workers should be paid fairly, have access to things like bathrooms & water, and be able to easily come and go as they need & desire.

        Try getting better nutrition, it’ll help with your energy problem.

        • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          As I mentioned below. I know more about this issue first hand and gone through more than you probably ever will in your life.

          Low energy. Son, you would have crumbled if you had to grow up the way I did.

          • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 minutes ago

            Fuckin’ glad I’m not your son, my dad was a real man who actually put the work in to help me become a caring and effective man, not watch me founder and mentally shrivel.

            I mean look at your comment. No shame, in spite of the supposed first hand experience. I feel for you, and for this country we both call home. Your crops, or your neighbors crops, may very well rot in the field while ripe, until the factory farm decides nearby decided to pay pennies on the dollar and take your land from you.

            All legal, all what we progressives didn’t want. You’ll understand after 4 years of further hardship in your community. Competition and a free market are good, if they are fair.

      • Slag@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        That was Florida in recent history, not the dems. “uhh can you latinos come back and work for us again?? no one is filling these jobs as you leave due to the recent legislative hatefest”

        Conservatives don’t realize they have slaves, let alone rely on them. They pound the table about migrants while paying someone employing them to mow their lawn or renovate their house. Press them about it and they always tell you it’s none of their business how the people they contract keep the prices down.

        • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          This sounds a bit anecdotal or even hyperbolic (maybe not the Florida bit, I don’t know I don’t live there so I don’t know what’s going on there).

          …pound the table about migrants…

          Why is it so impossible for this side of the argument to understand that the issue is with illegal migrants taking advantage of the system? You all go so far as to say things like “there is no such thing as an illegal immigrant!”

          Yes. Yes there is. By legal definition there is! And as the son of a legal immigrant, someone who has been directly involved with this system, I absolutely do take issue with this country opening the flood gates to allow skirting of the system. As do MOST legal immigrants as was shown by this election!

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The economy is actually great. Most people just don’t have the brains to understand why when they feel like it isn’t. Sentiment is king.

      • pinkystew@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What? Who is the economy great for? Many Americans are one missed paycheck from bankruptcy.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Which is exactly my point. Many Americans don’t feel like the economy is better in their own lives. But, overall, from a macroeconomic perspective, the economy is doing great.

          • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Who gives a fuck about the macroeconomic perspective

            The economy, to any person with a pulse, means “can I afford to live”. If the dictionary definition of an economy is different, then speak the language of the people.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Then you have to be willing to do economics like in Europe and redistribute (the GDP) wealth to basically make everyone middle-class. But Americans are also unwilling to do that. That’s “socialism” or “communism” or whatever label conservatives like to add to it. The US may have a somewhat higher GDP than many European countries, but most Europeans feel much more financially secure than most Americans.

      • Pieisawesome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        This is the kind of out of touch thinking that is why Harris lost.

        It literally doesn’t matter how great the economy is if people are struggling, and they are.

        No one gives a shit about how much the GDP grew, they can about the price of eggs and milk.

        Harris repeated biden saying the economy is great and ignored that there are people struggling and focusing in on messaging to help them.

        I know her policies might have helped the average American, but no one reads policies anymore, unfortunately.

        I’m a Harris voter.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The economy is stable and we’re at a new normal. People are hoping to take things back to how they were before even though that’s not how economies work.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          If you look at the average salary, it has kept up or exceeded inflation, but it has taken some time to catch up. But again, it’s the sentiment. If people feel poorer, they are poorer, even if they are not actually poorer.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Looks a lot like lack of awareness to me. The price of pretty much everything has at least stabilized or is down from the peak. Individuals are better off today than recently.

          However prices are shockingly high compared to four years ago. Many are worse off than four years ago. The economy is trending much better at the individual level but people can’t get past the four years of buildup to realize that it has turned around