• ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    She didn’t have to defend it. This was an election to run over Biden until he was just a pile of goo. She could have came out with some strong contrasting policies, instead she gave some great sound bytes for Trump.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was such an easy lay-up to fumble. Hell, she raised millions in personal donations compared to a Trump campaign that ended up stiffing locations on payment because they’re so broke, it was the rare election where the Dems didn’t need their corporate donors. They could have accepted some long-term financial losses in the face of potential greater long-term gains if they could maintain similar levels of personal donations from energized progressives. I remember the energy in the air when Harris/Walz was revealed, it seemed like a progressive ticket could seriously exist.

      And then it all vanished. Thanks for taking my $20, assholes. Wouldn’t have bothered if I knew they’d just dance to their owners demands anyway.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fumbling what should have been a cupcake question to talk about a major campaign promise is inexcusable.