• loo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    467
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    We are still learning what is best for PC players

    More like

    We are constantly limit-testing what level of exploitation our players can endure

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s weird how collective action works so well but they only choose to do it for this linking requirement. You could get the rootkits gone as well, gamers.

      • loo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most people don’t know what they’re installing or don’t care about their privacy, which is why there’s not enough people rising up against kernel level AC’s. Also, not being able to play until you create an account is much more upsetting to most people, than just clicking ‘update’ in League of Legends.

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Does the rootkit install alongside the game like without explicit user action? That’s pretty unfortunate.

          • loo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            7 months ago

            There’s a tooltip next to the update button that says something like ‘Our Anticheat Vanguard is out now!’ or smth like that. The rest is exactly the same as any other update

              • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                7 months ago

                Keep in mind this is purchasing a Sony product after they already showed us who they were with the first rootkit scandal.

                • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  For the kids:

                  The Sony BMG CD copy protection rootkit scandal was a scandal focused on the implementation of copy protection measures on about 22 million CDs distributed by Sony BMG in 2005. When inserted into a computer, the CDs installed one of two pieces of software that provided a form of digital rights management (DRM) by modifying the operating system to interfere with CD copying. Neither program could easily be uninstalled, and they created vulnerabilities that were exploited by unrelated malware. One of the programs would install and “phone home” with reports on the user’s private listening habits, even if the user refused its end-user license agreement (EULA), while the other was not mentioned in the EULA at all. Both programs contained code from several pieces of copylefted free software in an apparent infringement of copyright, and configured the operating system to hide the software’s existence, leading to both programs being classified as rootkits.

    • Guru_Insights99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      96
      ·
      7 months ago

      Brooooo this victory is an absolute game-changer for us die-hard Xbox fans, and it’s downright exhilarating! Sony’s constant blunders pale in comparison to the countless triumphs of team Xbox, and this might just be the knockout blow that finally converts those Lamestationers to our side. Brace yourselves for an epic shift as the unrivaled supremacy of our console dazzles and dominates, pulling every gamer into its unstoppable vortex of pure excitement and adrenaline-fueled gaming bliss!👊👊

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    278
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    “we’re still learning What’s best for PC players”

    Translation: We’re trying multiple predatory methods to see how far we can push PC players and figure out what we can get away with, compared to all the shit shows we successfully pulled off on our own platform.

    • ZeroTwo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      We all want PlayStation exclusives on PC, their response now is going to be their own launcher. Just a guess on my end.

      • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        What’s wild to me is they’re making their own overlay for their PC games. Ghost of Tsushima is supposed to be the first release title with it. Do they not understand steam already has an overlay? I feel like 2 overlays would just compete and be obnoxious and possibly ever impact performance.

        Also, why? If it is for co-op crossplay, just make linking PSN to Steam optional, and state it is needed for inviting/grouping with any PS5 friends. Then do what every other multiplatform game does and show 2 friends list in the game.

  • stardust@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    259
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    This shows the power of steam reviews with it being driven by the actual community. People tried to downplay and belittle its effectiveness, but it being front and center on the store page does have more impact than there would be without steam reviews. If there were no steam reviews the PSN requirement would have been pushed through with it being easier to ignore some random internet comments on social media than a store page.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      147
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Reviews aren’t pointless, but their impact only goes so far. I am assuming the massive amount of refunds had more to do with it, tbh.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        109
        ·
        7 months ago

        I suspect someone in accounting ran the numbers and decided they stand to lose more to reduced microtransaction sales than they would have gained via selling scraped data.

        Though I agreed with you. It’s still a win, but we have to be careful not to conflate this with Sony “caring”.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It was not “someone in accounting”

          This shit goes all the way to the top. Every manager in the chain will have their take and influence on the numbers.

          • Glide@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sure, and I’m not suggesting said bean counter was responsible for the decision. What I am suggesting is that the only thing that influenced the decision was bottom line finances. Someone ran the numbers, and when the suits discovered that they stand to lose more money than they’d gain, they reversed the decision. Never mistake this as Sony “listening” to anything more than their investors and their bottom line.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d imagine that there’s math to be done on sales for a mixed review game vs. a overwhelming positive one, and its not favorable.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Made me imagine a page where everyone everyday can leave 1 vote on how good the government performs

        If the scores are too low for a prolonged period of time, the government is dismissed.

        (Obviously a very first-second concept with millions of flaws - just a thought)

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Two-party system is the enemy of democracy to begin with

            But maybe even they would be more inclined to do better everyday

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Many countries actually have such systems in place today, even Russia (lol) - not that they work too well.

            Normally, there are two sources of issues here: petitions can in fact be declined, and, in cases where the signature count depends on scale of the petition they can be intentionally escalated as to make it impossible to gain enough signatures. Besides, in many cases petitions can be left unanswered for longer than promised.

            Long story short, the system is open to shenanigans and doesn’t make the government truly accountable.

            We need the system that would actually make politicians rapidly lose their jobs when they ignore public opinion.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Good detailed response :)

              make politicians rapidly lose their jobs when they ignore public opinion.

              Under such conditions, would the US have ended slavery or enacted the Civil Rights Act?

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Completely depends on who is allowed to vote.

                If slaves would have a vote, they’d certainly strongly choose one option :D

                Same for the discriminated groups.

                If they don’t have a vote, this depends on the rest of society in the short run, but can cause violent rebellions in the long one. Democratic system does not eliminate possibility of revolt.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The sony communities I saw poopooing the whole thing flipped immediately into “WE DID IT” mode, pretending they actually cared about the people that were going to lose access.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is why Steam reviews should be taken much more seriously. This was impossible to avoid due to the enormous amount of bad press and devs themselves jumping on the hate train, but I’m betting that a lot of review bombing attempts have been quietly offset by the company just paying people for fake reviews. It’s especially obvious when the game has relatively low reviews for months and months, then suddenly bad stuff happens and along with the justified dump of negative reviews, positive ones also skyrocket (99% of which composed of “good game”, random memes or ascii art).

  • _eHM@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    219
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Negative reviews should remain until the purchase restrictions put in place on Steam for non-PSN countries have been reverted.

    Until then this looks like a temporary move for damage control and they’ll try this again when refunds are less likely and wont be from restricted countries.

    https://steamdb.info/sub/137730/history/?changeid=23416542

    Democracy has not won yet.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There was a theory that the purchase restrictions were put in place by Valve, not Sony (because those countries couldn’t make an account without violating TOS). If so, Valve might shortly remove the restrictions.

      • TheDonkerZ@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Would the publisher not have to request the game not be sold in those countries before Valve restricts the sale of it?

        I believe that Valve may be the ones who do it, but just doing it without permission sounds… Illegal and out of their jurisdiction.

        I know Valve controls their storefront and can absolutely pull games down, just looking for some clarification on whether this could be true or not.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          7 months ago

          Valve can remove games from sale for any reason they like - it’s been a point of consumer contention when they are accused of censorship for certain risque anime games, too.

          • They can completely remove a game from sale if it turns out to be bricking people’s computers or function terribly. (Sony did this with Cyberpunk on PSN, without CDPR’s approval)
          • There may be suspicion the game is not legitimate for sale, for instance it illegally uses someone else’s work.
          • Going country-specific, if a game is revealed to be slightly less than universally positive to the perfectly infallible, totally-not-genocidal Chinese Communist Party, they may want to stop sales in China.

          If a game lets you buy it in Tanzania, download it in Tanzania, and then to play, has you sign an agreement that says “I truthfully state that I do not live in Tanzania”, then that bone-headed agreement reflects poorly on Valve, so they have almost a legal need to take it out of sale in that country.

          Basically, each country has its own laws of sale. Having those switches to turn off sales in certain places is important for the store’s own safety. While 60% of the blame for selling a faulty product goes to the manufacturer, 40% still goes to the storefront that chose to stock and sell that faulty good. In this case, the fault was specific to the country of play.

          • TheDonkerZ@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s right, I have heard of some of these cases, but thank you very much for the info! I definitely didn’t want Sony to have any ground to stand on here, so happy that Valve is able to step up to protect consumers however they can.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I wish they’d remove some of the PS2 to PC ports on their store that don’t actually run anymore. Prince of Persia, Saints Row 2, etc.

          • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I hope Valve never does this. Tons of games on Steam only work with community fixes, it sets a bad precedent if they pull them because they don’t work in their official state.

            It’s better to have them then not, I would just force a disclaimer during sale for abandoned titles that most players have reported that the game does not function without community patches.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Well the guy who made GotR to get saints row working died a few years back and AFAIK the game is effectively nonfunctional for the majority of people who buy it. Those people paid for a product that they cannot use. They could go emulate the game for free and it would run better.

              Plus, the owners of the title have a functioning PC version sold elsewhere than Steam. They could easily remedy this if Steam took away their listing.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Is there one for Sims 3 Medieval? A warning that it wasn’t playable on modern OSes would have sufficed.

        • AProfessional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          We don’t know their personal contract, but calling it illegal is ridiculous, I’m sure Valve explicitly allows for this.

          • TheDonkerZ@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s why I said I wasn’t sure and that I was asking for clarification?

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Illegal and out of their jurisdiction

          Illegal means against the law… so no.
          Out of their jurisdiction, Steam is Valve’s platform, so no again.

          Valve is the seller in this case, who will be liable for the agreement they have with their customers. If one of their sold product is going to end up massively refunded, who do you think will be processing these? Then Valve has to turn around and get the money from Sony… guess how Valve estimates that will go.

          So step 1 for Valve is limit exposure by stopping sales where you expect issues.
          Step 2 is analyzing the potential for refunds in other countries and limiting there as well if deemed to big a risk.

          I can only imagine that feedback from Valve to Sony played a role in the decision to not push forward. As large corporations only speak money… the cost benefit made at Sony must have missed some things to have it now skew the other way.

          I’ll believe the account requirement will be totally in the past IF the sales to the non PSN countries are reinstated. Cause why limit your customers to countries if that is not necessary.

    • poleslav@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly I’m keeping my negative review permanent. The game is great and I enjoy it, but besides a temporary back lash I want the sting to stick around to hopefully teach companies about fucking around and finding out.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe you’ll be teaching them that changing course brings no relief from punishment

        • dezmd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe he’ll be teaching them that trying to force enshittification on people in the first place has repercussions.

      • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        They won’t learn anything. They only nulled their bullshit because it would hurt their financial quarter because their biggest cash cow game at the moment is bombing. They only way to maybe make them learn would be if every single one of the “outraged gamers” would just uninstall and never play it again, but that won’t happen and Sony knows that (which is why they can try pulling that shit in the first place).

        Good for the peeps in non-PSN countries tho. For them, this is a real win.

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “We’re still learning what is best for PC players”

    Well PlayStation staff member, it definitely isn’t having people create another account when they already have a Steam account.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        132
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        How much less bullshit PC players are willing to put up with compared to their console counterparts, apparently.

        • aksdb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          73
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Uhhhh, people install shit like Vanguard just so that they can keep having their mother insulted in the ingame chat.

          And many people put up with cascades of different lauchers (and accounts).

          So I am glad that there was some push back this time, but it’s not like there would be some sane baseline of PC players in that regard.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Imagine doing this for all kinds of stuff like ads, over priced groceries, other games that required needless launchers.

            Just surprising how this works so often and every time there are still people trying to convince everyone to just move on.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              If people were capable of choosing long over short term value then the market might be working instead of the shitshow it is right now. IDGI either.

          • xep@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            42
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s almost as if cheaters ruin hyper competitive games like Valorant. How dare they try to keep the game free from cheaters. The nerve!

            • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’d have a bit more symphaty if they at least tried to do the bare minimum before choosing the nuclear option.

              Most notably, the PVE queues in LoL were infested with bots for years and you could tell them apart from real players before they even made their first move. Often times you’d be the only human player. If stuff like that wasn’t caught, I have serious doubts about their previous efforts to catch “real” cheaters.

              • aksdb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Also there could (and should?) be “simply” two launch options. One with “hardcore anti cheat” and one with some much simpler anti-cheat. Then a lobby option what you want to allow. You want to play competitive/league/whatever? Then require the hardcore anti-cheat. Otherwise: why bother.

                • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yup. At the very least, they shouldn’t have made it a requirement for TFT. If it were possible to cheat there that’d be more of a game design problem anyway.

            • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              As someone who rehosts an old game after the official servers shutdown, we have a dedicated servers for cheating and real moderators for the non-cheat ones. It works great but big corps don’t way to pay for mods.

              I also wonder why big companies don’t do it to train ML algorithms on the cheat server data too…

                • aksdb@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Only if you want to cap the skill limit. Otherwise you would typically have a hand full of players that are genuinely just good or rather far outside the normal skill range. I guess with a lot of data collection one might be able to determine if there was some kind of natual progress or sudden skill jumps, but all in all it could weed out legitimate players.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              Honestly I’d rather have a cheater in my lobby than Riot Games deep into the sections of my PC they should never have accessed.

              With that said, I do not play Valorant for this reason (and also because it would require me to dualboot since Vanguard cannot be ported on Linux, lol)

            • Jako301@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’d be somewhat ok with Kernel anticheat if they would work, but the simple truth is that they do nothing of value. COD has Kernel anticheat with Riccochet and is flooded with cheaters. Valorant has only slightly less cause riot updates Vanguard more often.

              But guess what, it usually takes 1-2 days for new cheats to reach the relevant forums, maybe a few days more until they are more widely aviable. At most cheaters have to spend another 5€ every 6 months, but that’s it. They don’t care, the amount of money spent on accounts every other month is already way higher.

              The only two things anticheat like vanguard protects you from is script kiddies that google “valorant cheat .exe” and Linux only players. And the former could just as well be filtered out without Kernel level.

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s all a fucking smokescreen. Man, people just eat that shit up. Every time. It’s almost like the game is saturated in satire and we’re spooning it down ourselves.

        Oh, wait. fuck.

      • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe a company that has (mostly) made consoles isn’t exactly playing games or has people on staff on the executive level that play(ed) on a PC. I’m 30 and outside of a brief time I tried to play on a PC I’ve pretty much been console my entire life. My first gaming experiences were all on console. It’s completely logical for a company to make a move like this when they have specialized in one area for a time.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just another nail to the bootlicker’s coffin of “review bombing does nothing”.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    We’re still learning what is best for PC players

    We’ll keep you updated on future plans

    Behind the scenes coming up with the future plans:

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, like, you know what is best for PC players, it just doesn’t come together with financial interest :D

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        and this is why i wish people would make it profitable, fuck AAA titles, give your money to indies who respect the consumers and actually just want to make a fun game.

        I wish game devs would found a union that helps developers fund and publish games with no profit incentive, it seems like such an obvious thing to do and has the potential to revolutionizing how people create and play games.

        No longer would we be beholden to companies, no longer would developers have to compromise their works for profit, no longer would players have to tolerate predatory bullshit.
        Just good games made by passionate people who are happy to have people enjoy their works while being able to afford to live on it.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s what I normally do - pirate or ignore AAA’s, but always buy indies.

          The problem with the union idea is that most games just won’t pay off huge investments, so there needs to be someone competent who filters out profitable games, and funds games based on expected returns…and at that point we get, essentially, a publisher company. Or maybe a cooperative. But barely a union.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The lack of humility in their statement makes me think they haven’t learned anything.

    • RampageDon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yea, this reads more like a sorry, this was too forced we will do something more subtle in the future. Not an actual apology.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They don’t even say sorry. They did not use the words Sorry, Mistake, Problem, Wrong, or Fault. They say the approximation of “We see you’re absolutely outraged. We’ve decided to change our decisions. We are always improving.”

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      Translated: Dear suckers who keep giving us money for half-finished products. We are sincerely sorry, sorry for getting caught. We thought we could squeeze through with this one, but apparently our PC fans are not as gullible as our console fans.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They haven’t. Ghosts of Tsushima’s PC release is going to require account-linking from day 1 for the online component. The only thing Sony has learned is that the shittiness has to be ready and working from the start.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        AFAIK the game is still banned in countries where you can’t get a PSN account and also it still ships with a rootkit, so…

        • Statick@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          People were saying that might have been Valve just covering themselves from potential lawsuits. We’ll just have to see if it’s reverted.

          Nope nevermind, I was hopeful it was good guy Steam but it was in fact Sony. Fuck Sony. Will never buy another Sony game.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      7 months ago

      Corporate PR speak always sounds cringe and I despise it. Just be humans you fucking pricks.

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tbf, I’ve seen what happens to indies when they’re just humans in how they talk to their customers/fans. HR speak exists for a reason unfortunately

      • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nah, I’d rather they keep speaking like this. Makes it really obvious from the get go who I’m dealing with. If they speak normally, they might blend in

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Always is. They went too far. They scale back and try again when the dust has settled.

      Oldest trick in the books

    • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Starting off with “we’ve heard your feedback” is something I’ve never heard from an abusive parent?

      • deegeese
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        “I understand you’re upset but…”

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Naw it’s more like “we did something we knew would make you incredibly uncomfortable; but now that you’re screaming we’re worried about the neighbors hearing it and we don’t want the cops called on us, so we’ll back off until a more opportune time.”

    • Cornucopiaofplenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s Feedback in the way that microphone feedback is - really bloody loud and painful, and makes you know you’ve done something wrong

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah exactly. And it’s often the only feedback that gets any attention unfortunately. It was getting media attention and getting very loud.

        Plus the whole thing was just stupid. They could have accomplished exactly the same thing with little backlash by offering some little in-game trinket for voluntarily linking a PSN account where it was possible to get one. This wasn’t my idea, I saw it somewhere on Lemmy, but that person needs to get a job at Sony stat because the chucklefucks working there now have no clue.

  • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    For now… 🖕🏽 They worded that so weasely, they’re just waiting for the storm to pass and for Legal to come up with some compelling reason why they’re totally “obligated” to make it happen, “hands tied” “so sorry” and all that.

    Fuck Sony. They made this SOP way back when, and there’s no way they let this stop them forever. It’s all about profit, not what “we” want.

    • raker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      “You know that thing where the initial assault is just a ploy to draw people in for the real attack?”