• Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    7 months ago

    I suspect someone in accounting ran the numbers and decided they stand to lose more to reduced microtransaction sales than they would have gained via selling scraped data.

    Though I agreed with you. It’s still a win, but we have to be careful not to conflate this with Sony “caring”.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It was not “someone in accounting”

      This shit goes all the way to the top. Every manager in the chain will have their take and influence on the numbers.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure, and I’m not suggesting said bean counter was responsible for the decision. What I am suggesting is that the only thing that influenced the decision was bottom line finances. Someone ran the numbers, and when the suits discovered that they stand to lose more money than they’d gain, they reversed the decision. Never mistake this as Sony “listening” to anything more than their investors and their bottom line.