• bleistift2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    10% false positives is an enormous rate given how Police like to ‘find’ evidence and ‘elicit’ confessions.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      It isn’t predicting individual crimes, just pattern recognition and extrapolation like how the weather is predicted.

      “There are on average 4 shootings in November in this general area so there probably will be 4 again this year.” is the kind of prediction that AI is making.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        So they are using it to try and decide on deployment?

        If that is all they’re using it for I guess it isn’t too bad. As long as it isn’t accusing individuals of planning to commit a crime with a zero evidence.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          It is probably going to be used to justify the disproportionate police attention paid to minority communities and to justify activities similar to stop and frisk.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The thing is don’t they already have crime stats? Presumably they’re already using them as justification so this won’t change much.

    • lugal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s in a punitive system. Used in a transformative/preventive manner (which it will not), this can actually save lives and help people in need