Auf meinen steht nichmal ne Marke
Jo, ich kann es mir leisten, ökologisch und sozial verantwortungsbewusster zu sein und wollte das tun. Aber mit diesen Schnösel-Öko-Produkten gibt es irgendwie immer Probleme. Wenn die ihre Scheiße nicht zusammen kriegen, werden’s halt wieder die von pestizidverseuchten Kindern aus verstahlter Monsanto-Baumwolle im Schmelzofen zusammengehäkelten Socken vom Aldi-Grabbeltisch. Sollen die Hippies mir doch die Eier lecken.
Ersetze im Text „Größe” durch „Größenbereich”. Die Bereiche überlappen sich nicht. Es ändert sich also nichts.
Also ist die Stelle zu haben? Ich habe genau keine Qualifikationen, aber bin sehr lernbereit.
I didn’t recognize that as a tongue, no. To me it was a weirdly shaped heart. Or rather, a pink triangle.
Both time indicators show the remaining time for ripping the song (top) and ripping one instrument from the song (bottom).
Both are indicators for the remaining ripping duration. The song is much longer.
I didn’t think of that. And it wasn’t even late when I commented, so I don’t have an excuse.
What the hell about “Mommy will put you in time-out” makes you think it’s horny? Lay off the Pornhub, dude.
Germany has had that for a couple of years. When that law was introduced, commercials really became quiter on some channels. Then the stations found out that no-one actually sues, so we’re back to square one.
The channel names are different. How can you not tell?
15 minute YouTube video trying an explanation: by ExtraCredits
Andere kommentierten, dass die Spinne bleiben soll, weil sie Insekten umbringt. Was nun?
Why did you join a discussion space if you don’t like discussing?
What constitutes AI by your definition?
If it were possible to tell, at a glance, whether something was or was not AI, it would not be causing nearly the social harm that it does.
It seems like you’re shifting away from the point of discussion, which was whether AI output can be art, and more towards the general dangers of the technology itself, which is a whole other discussion.
My opposition is to demon tech produced by vampires.
It also seems like this discussion is taking a toll on you. If you are interested in continuing it, there’s no harm in taking a step back and coming back later.
there is hardly confusion about whether something is or is not a photograph.
This proposition is refuted by hyperrealistic paintings such as La hora del té by Magda Torres Gurza. You can see that this is not a photography if you pay attention to the reflections. But certainly not at “first glance”.
The most complicated comfyUI-whatever is worth less to me than a child’s drawing of their parents because the child’s drawing is communicating love while the generated one is communicating nothing.
How can you say what the output of that workflow communicates or doesn’t communicate without seeing it?
The lot of them can’t even explain their own work—at best they can explain their comfyUI workflow because that’s the thing they actually put effort into.
That statement is unsubstantiated. Without knowing the creator of that workflow I venture the following proposition: If the creator put in hours of effort into constructing it, so the AI would produce just the right output, then they clearly had a vision of what they were going for. And If they tried to get a detail just right, then that detail must have meaning to them, or else they wouldn’t bother.
I see another issue with the statement “The lot of them can’t even explain their own work”. Do you think every stroke of the brush has a meaning for a painter? Is every note carefully chosen in a piece of music? Or is it rather a case of “doing what feels right at the moment”? I ask that because I don’t see the difference in playing a few chord progressions on the piano and seeing what fits best, and letting AI generate a few outputs and seeing what fits best.
I can generate my own monkey throwing a banana, why would I need to see theirs?
Because theirs is the one they chose out of many options. Theirs is the one they felt came closest to their vision. Theirs is the one they wanted to share with you because it meant something to them.
Nur weil er jetzt ’ne Axt hat, musst du ihm nicht den Tisch hinterher werfen.