She’s built like a steakhouse, but she handles like a bistro."

Book of Mormon maybe?

How about now?

!bonehurtingjuice@lemmy.ca

Does that link work for ya?

“I can’t live without you and the other three people and also the ones I didn’t tell you about.”

“In front of my salad!?”

Flirty people in movies.

Real people in relationships.

Weirdos who deserve to have their reheated fast food burger smashed.

I wonder if the helmet visor is functional.

This photo makes me happy. Just the right about of found absurdity with the perfect framing.

I am pretty sure it is is mostly old, used grease. Reminds me of the smell when cleaning out a fryer, but even worse.

I assumed it was bwing used the current common usage for using a web search, like how kleenex is used for any facial tittle, not literally Google the search engine.

Speaking of literal, Google is putting Gemini results before search results, not using chatGPT.

This would be handy in my area to know if I need to roll up the windows before driving by the potato chip production facility.

No, it does not smell like potato chips.

I don’t use this social media and am guessing little on the symbols, but I think the ratio is referring to likes for each.

Mandani- 133k likes

Cuomo: 4.2k likes

Also, Mandani replied to the sex pest so everyone that viewed Mamdani’s post saw Cuomo’s and had the opportunity to like it. A reply having 30x the likes of the one it replied to is wild.

Can the transporter change me into the same gender?

Is this loss?

I’ve heard that before and it sounds plausible, but the anticipation making things take longer is clever instead of literal.

People before facebook thought critically of what they saw on the news as much as they do facebook today.

Sure, people didn’t think about things too much at any point in time and sources aren’t always perfectly reliable, but some sources are worse than others,

I don’t use ChatGPT

Then why are you defending it? Is it necessary for every complaint about AI to have a wall of text clarifying that when we are complaining about extremely common issues with AI that is being forced on everyone that we are using shorthand for those specific issues for those AI implementations based on the context of what is currently being discussed?

In this case I am specifically complaining about ChatGPT and similar implementations. Kind of like when I complain about IPA beers I’m not complaining about every single beer that has ever been made.

Yes, the summary is right but also extremely verbose and redundant. Like the first or very last sentence covered everything. Like how many times does it need to repeat the same thing over and over again?

I’m apparently ahead of the game as I’ve already made it to depression.

Don’t expect to make it to acceptance, unless coping counts.

Go ask chatGPT