• nob0dy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. This deal would have killed Activision as we know it. Microsoft would continued their strategy of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

    • CliodhnaBaskerville@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mean to sound like a corporate simp, but TBH this was one merger I was half-rooting for, since Microsoft have been overall more pro-consumer than Activision-Blizzard over the past few years. I was kind of hoping they would clean house and restructure Blizzard in particular.

      • B1S0N@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the misconception here is that Microsoft would STAY pro-consumer after acquiring everything under the sun. Companies are forced to be pro-consumer when there is actual competition, and the opposite is almost always true without regulation.

        • WraithGear@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are probably right. Remember xBox’s past shenanigans. Its not even healthy to rely on valve to be benevolent forever let alone Microsoft. To bad Activision has to be terrible too.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean is killing Activision as we know it really a bad thing? I can’t imagine Microsoft doing much worse with them then what they’ve been doing.

    • simple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Extinguish what? It’s not like ActiBlizz aren’t already employing the most anti-consumer tactics out there. The only part of Activision that was good was Toys for Bob, and they effectively killed it.