• LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because she isn’t? Sure she’s better than any of the Republicans, but that’s a stupid low bar and doesn’t really tell you much. Her record in California is abysmal, she had zero support in her campaign, and she’s done fuck all since she became VP. She’s essentially a glorified security barrier to stand between the nuclear codes and whatever asshat the Republicans end up shoving in as Speaker in the event that Biden goes the way of all flesh during his term.

    • DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agree, but dammit all if I didn’t come here to just dap you for the final turn of phrase. Haven’t heard that in ages, well done.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      She’s essentially a glorified security barrier to stand between the nuclear codes and whatever asshat the Republicans end up shoving in as Speaker

      To be fair, that’s pretty much all the VP really does. Pretty much the only point of having a VP is to have someone ready in case the President mysteriously drops dead or something. They could eliminate the entire position tomorrow and it wouldn’t change a thing.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes that’s their only real official job but quite a few have projects they work on. Things they are passionate about. Things they push for.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the main issue here has nothing to do with Harris , it’s all about Biden and his age. When Obama tapped Biden to be his VP, he did it partially to counteract the idea that Obama was too young and inexperienced for the job. So we got to hear about Biden’s leadership qualities right away, as well as his influence on decisions. Obama was essentially borrowing Biden’s experience, he gained directly from having Biden involved.

    The Biden/Harris dynamic is different, because Biden is so old, he needs to continually prove that he had the stamina to govern, wholly, on his own. Pushing off any significant part of his agenda to Harris might start talk that his facilities are slipping.

    This upcoming election is sure to be Biden’s last time in front of voters, though. If he wins, he is safe to spend the next 4 years burnishing Harris’ credentials for 2028, because at that point it doesn’t matter anymore.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a nice sugarcoating of the Obama/Biden situation, but the reality was that Biden the old white man was chosen in an attempt to calm down racists over a young black man president.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’d be one cynical way of interpreting it. Another less condescending take, and I think more based in reality, was that Obama was a senator for a brief time before elevation to the white house. He needed someone experienced in both getting legislation passed and handling all the interpersonal relationships a president must forge - and they got the ideal guy, Joe “I’ve lived on cap hill for 20 fucking years” Biden. Joe understood the people and the legislative machinery in a way that a jr senator simply had little experience with. Together they made a pretty groovy combo.

      • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Obama won twice so despite some racists not liking it, the nation as a whole chose him as the best candidate. It can happen again but I doubt that candidate is Harris.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the thing, the country wanted change and change is what Obama promised. Race plays a part but in ways many don’t account for and it doesn’t play as much a role in other ways that many think it does. The same is true for gender. Some like to claim Hillary lost because of her gender, but they don’t account for her messaging that the status quo is fine. The person who was promising change in that presidential race was her opponent, Trump, who ended up winning. This is not a mere coincidence.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        that’d be one cynical way of interpreting it. Another less condescending take, and I think more based in reality, was that Obama was a senator for a brief time before elevation to the white house. He needed someone experienced in both getting legislation passed and handling all the interpersonal relationships a president must forge - and they got the ideal guy, Joe “I’ve lived on cap hill for 20 fucking years” Biden. Joe understood the people and the legislative machinery in a way that a jr senator simply had little experience with. Together they made a pretty groovy combo.

    • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But her issues now appear to be that she’s not liked even (especially?) among her own staff.

      That’s been her issue for years. She was wildly unpopular in the primaries last time. God help us if she ever gets the nomination for President, because I truly believe she is un-electable nationally.

    • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, we don’t need a female democratic Trump, thanks.

      She sounds like she should just join the maga choir. Get away from the white house, please, vp Harris. Or just become a decent, competent human.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Typical Dem - bad at politics, abysmal messaging, just there to say “oops the repugs did it again, darn if only we could have raised more money and done something to stop them!”

    To Harris’ credit she has attempted to fight for women’s healthcare access, women’s inclusion in STEM, etc…she just sucks at telling anyone about it. And the rumors about how she treats her staff are super cringe if true.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the perpetual double standard. Qualifications are important. So let’s talk about Trump and George W Bush. How were they in any way shape or form qualified? Bush didn’t even finish his national guard service. Trump doesn’t understand why soldiers die for their country. Both of those twats shouldn’t ‘qualify’ for president.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s part of what is so frustrating about Harris - she is qualified, but doesn’t make her case. Trump will straight up tell MAGA that only he can protect them from the deep state transing their kids, and they lap it right up.

        It’s just bizarre how bad Dems are at messaging…maybe they suffer from being in the Washington bubble and constantly being reassured they’re the greatest ever, I don’t know. This consistently hamstrings their party by failing to lead, and instead settling for “at least we’re not them.” Newsflash ya idgits - we’re all Americans.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s because the US is dysfunctional. Just like always looking for abusive relationships, when someone normal comes around we aren’t prepared because we are used to doing coke of a bare ass and then wrestling a grizzly.

          US politicians are about getting attention through shock and pushing the envelope because the people demand entertainment rather than what it should be about. Governing people and companies.

        • vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately sir I don’t get to set the menu, only serve it up. Please speak with the DNC otherwise.

    • Astroturfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      She just seems like an awful person who has all the charisma of Hilary Clinton. Her poll numbers dropped the more people heard her speak in the primary for a reason. She had that one early moment she called Biden racist and it got her the VP slot.

      She has no business being a prominent politician. She’s unlikable, and has no platform or track record. Hopefully Biden survives his second term and she disappears into the shadows after she gets some of the lowest primary turn out you’ve ever seen for a VP in the next primary.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Politics is full of awful people. JFC look at Trump, look at the entire GOP - it’s chuds like Jordan all the way down.

        Comparing Harris to Hillary Clinton honestly only elevates her in the eyes of prog libs and true believer dems. but cute whiney pout you got going there. She had an excellent track record in California, let’s talk about Trump’s track record lol. Or GWB’s service record.

        JFC just say you don’t like the lady because she’s a woman and she’s black, if you were honest with yourself instead of fabricating things to whine about I’d give you a modicum of respect. Your post reads like a best-of chuds post from the 2020 election.

        • great_site_not@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In the 2020 primary, she got fewer votes than Andrew Yang in her own home state. Not extremely promising as far as electability.

        • v_krishna@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Her track record in California is arresting parents for their kids being truant, and basically being a cop. I’d love to like her, I’m also half Indian and my kids went to the same elementary school as her but I’m really not a fan.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t heard a single thing about her since she became VP. Has the news just been avoiding her? Has she done anything in the past three years?

    I don’t exactly avoid the news, but I know more about some congresspeople / governors / senators than I do about the sitting VP.

    • sin_free_for_00_days
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me preface this by saying I’m not a fan of Harris. Despite this,

      • she has been lobbying pretty hard for abortion rights.
      • she has actually had some successes in addressing the deep causes of illegal immigration, despite the optics of the symptoms
      • she did a good job pushing for voting rights, but was ultimately stymied by fucking Manchin and Sinema

      But then again, as people have pointed out, the VP is just kind of sitting there as insurance. I’m so incredibly disappointed in the Dems inability to primary their candidates.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s kind of the job of VP, though. She’s been in the news but never in the front.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a failure of the party to not promote her then. Gore got coverage and sponsored legislation as a vp. Cheney spearheaded an entire war. A vp can be in the news cycle if you want them to.

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Gore has always been a huge media favorite (even before he became VP), knew how to play the game and loved the attention. Same for Cheney. Some VP are more on the front, but you hadn’t heard much of Biden while he was VP, and Pence… well he was a lap dog until the constitution depended on him.

          Can you even tell me who George HW Bush’s VP was? Or Carter’s? Without looking?

          Harris doesn’t care about it, it’s not required for her job, and if she doesn’t do a good job we’d probably know about it more than if she did.

          • vivadanang@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You mean VP Potato! Will always remember that before Quayle.

            I recall Carter’s veep because I have family who are distantly related to Mondale via marriage. They were all upset when he lost again in the 80s, like, they were gonna get VIP passes to the white house via some elaborate scheme for 4th cousins. lol

    • xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When Obama was in power Biden just seemed to be the smiling old white uncle that had a couple funny cameos on TV, from my recollection.

      • guacupado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah I don’t understand what people expect from a VP. I don’t remember a VP ever being big news for as long as I’ve been alive.

        Oh, wait, Cheney. Yeah, maybe a VP being out of the spotlight is a good thing.

        • GlendatheGayWitch@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Teddy was big as VP, but that’s about it. They spend a lot of their days in the Senate in meetings to help push through legislation and breaking ties whenever they happen.

  • cyd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there any sense whatsoever of Harris having contributed meaningfully in internal deliberations of the executive branch? As VP, Biden played a reasonably active role in debates over, e.g., foreign policy (he was well known as one of the most outspoken doves on Iraq/Afghanistan issues). Even if he didn’t always get his way (actually, he often didn’t), he was there in the room. I don’t get the sense that Harris is pulling her weight to the same extent.

    Obama also carved out portfolios for Biden to handle, like overseeing the disbursal of stimulus funds; face it, giving out of goodies is probably the single thing politicians love best. What has Biden carved out for Harris? Solving the border problem—that sounds like he’s screwing her over rather than helping groom her as a successor. Maybe she will next be tasked with resolving the Israel-Palestinian conflict?

    • Zaktor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget fixing voting rights and solving America’s gun problem. Just a couple of easy wins to build her profile.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What does VP Harris stand for? What does she value? I don’t know much about her political philosophy. I’m not invested in her because I don’t know her.

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also ask, what has she accomplished? I honestly don’t know, and it is part of the reason she’s not my preferred Democrat.

      • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would recommend reading the article as it devotes a lot of text to discussing this.

        One big takeaway is that Harris is uncomfortable with self promotion and more at ease doing the work behind the scenes. Hence her success as a DA, but then trouble standing out during her primary campaign and as VP.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s one of the biggest issues with how we do elections. It’s a popularity contest, not a vote for who is actually best suited for the role, hence why we have to even speak about Trump. All celebrity, 0 credentials.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            President isn’t a behind the scenes position though. If you can’t handle the spotlight and promotion of a campaign, you can’t handle being the person the president.

    • Xerø@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That means she’s doing her job. The best VPs are the invisible ones .

  • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Harris probably thinks of herself as the loyal government servant who has always done what is asked of her. The problem is, much of what America does is unpopular with public and people want to find politicians to blame everything on.

    I would bet her poll numbers would flip if she spent her VP career pissing off rightwing donors and going left of Biden on popular issues.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Normally the vice president wouldn’t get this kind of attention. She’s getting this attention because Biden is so old, and he is standing again for election. Vice President is a bizarre non-job in the US system but also very important because of its potential.

    Kamala Harris is being attacked because there is a serious chance she will be President.

    On the one hand she is being attacked and undermined because she’s a woman and she’s black. But on the other hand it is an election and it’s right to think about the vice president, and particularly one who may actually be President.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      …or is she simply hated because of her history as a prosecutor and the air of disingenuousness she gives off?

      Tbf, I find something to hate about most US politicians, but I really don’t like the idea of it being semi-planned to elect an old fart for a second term so he can die of old age and the appointed VP “inherits” the position.

      …the US political system is so fucked up.

  • DLSantini@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Until scrolling past this post, and then scrolling back out of confusion, I had completely forgotten she even existed.

  • EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would help if she was a proponent of weed. Sounds like she needs to start toking, regardless, if her own staff hates her.

    • AliceTheMinotaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I remember correctly she does or did, just thinks other people should be jailed for it and don’t think other people should be released from prison for it, and be used as cheap labour.

      She a case of rules for thee not for me.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really hope Biden goes with a different VP pick this go around, maybe Buttigieg or someone more competent. I had hoped Harris was gone for good after the primaries, she’s just been a waste this whole time. Maybe it’s because of how important VPs have been the past few administrations, whereas traditionally it’s been a do-nothing position, Harris has sort of brought the position back to it’s normal role.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really hope Biden goes with a different VP pick this go around, maybe Buttigieg or someone more competent.

      I very seriously doubt Biden is going to switch up VP picks. That’s just dumping a truckload of fodder for the GOP to use against him.

      Biden isn’t going to lose any votes over keeping Harris. That would imply that Democrat voters are willing to say that they dislike Harris so much that they’re willing to essentially vote for Trump in protest. But he could lose votes over whoever the next VP pick is, as the fact that he switched up VPs midstream is going to immediatly become a focal point of the campaign, regardless of who the new pick is.

      I’m not a fan of Harris and she has the personality of sandpaper. But I think going in a different direction would be worse than keeping her around.

      • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I agree. In a time when the party needs to portray confidence, consistency, and predictability in the face of a rudderless and treasonous GOP, the last thing they need to do is hand the position off and inject a bunch of chaos and uncertainty into the process. That’ll hand Republicans all the campaign fodder they’ll ever need.

        Harris is a total dud but they’re sticking with her, and we’d be better off if people went ahead and abandoned the idea that she’ll be replaced. It’s just not going to happen.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s the reason I wish Biden wouldn’t run again. I think he can beat any Republican candidate, including Trump, but if he has any health issues I’m a lot less confident that Harris can win.

    This is a popularity contest, candidates need some charisma and the common touch, she’s lacking in these areas.

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Republican Party is burning itself to the ground as we speak. I’d predict Gavin Newsom would run and comfortably win.

        • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wish Newsom was running now. If Biden backed off and supported Newsom I don’t think anyone the Repuggs produce would stand a chance.

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, she’s a transphobic cop and somehow has even less charisma than our shambling lich of a president