And in doing so not only didn’t show the president doing embarrassing and disrespectful things, it showed entirely different coffins. Friends and family may have seen that footage and thought it was their loved one only to learn their chosen propaganda-entertainment-news channel thought their coffins were interchangeable props.
We should not consider Israeli newspapers as credible sources of information on any wars they’re involved in.
It really depends on how many other books you own along with it. 1000? Possibly not a Nazi. 5? Pretty questionable.
Also libraries exist. You don’t need to keep going back to reference the Fuhrer’s state of mind at different times throughout your life.
I’m sure the courts will have this resolved by around when the invasion of Cuba is wrapping up.
I remember when I first heard that they were elevating his son my mind jumped to it being a young and dynamic war time figurehead. Someone who could grab a gun and pose with the troops for propaganda. Then I remembered that the former guy was 86. All these leaders are so fucking old their children already have gray hairs. This guy fought in the Iran-Iraq War back in the 80s.
I don’t really remember him ever being a rising star. He was in tight with Pelosi and able to pull a bunch of big money, but he was never the go to guy to present the Democratic case on an issue. No one ever talked about how that guy could be president some day.
Yeah. Doesn’t seem like the type of guy to restore some semblance of law and order among the gestapo.
I’m shocked mouth pieces for Israel like Josh Gottheimer and Ritchie Torres backed down.
Which is why the Constitution gives the exclusive power to initiate war to the Congress. They’re supposed to have skin in the game and fear for reelection if they enter into an unpopular war. It’s not just that they didn’t trust the office most inclined to go to war to make the decision, they wanted to spread responsibility across the branch most responsive to public opinion so they couldn’t dodge responsibility.
a single Mark 48 torpedo, a sophisticated munition specifically designed to sink ships
As opposed to the torpedos not designed to sink ships?
It’s “you are” now in my side. Chalk it up to the mysteries of federation!
It’s still “your” on my side, but I can believe an edit didn’t propagate correctly.
What’s the guy in the top left have against cubic polynomials?
I’m torn between up voting for the sentiment and down voting for the misspelled “you’re”.
This isn’t the hill to die on, but liberal states need to become comfortable with the idea that the Supreme Court’s rulings are advisory when they step out of bounds like this. The belief that we need to preserve the Court’s legitimacy because one day they’ll swing back to protecting people’s rights is a pleasant fantasy. They’re political agents and will be inserting themselves arbitrarily to advance their political causes for the next 30 years.
How did that case even get there? If it was filled in state court it was presumably being considered under state law. And even if that was incorrect and it was a case of federal law, it should have been transferred to a lower court first. Otherwise they don’t really have any reason to intervene or even jurisdiction in determining what state law is.
In the model of Venezuela as long as the actual top leader isn’t in charge anymore, it’s regime change.
The audacity to even ask him that question.
It’s like one step up from Joe Rogan disclaiming his own words because he’s a self-proclaimed dumbass. It’s a self-aware statement from an elderly man acknowledging the things he says may be wrong but he just doesn’t care to spend his time trying to be accurate, but from a president and the center of a bluster-based regime it’s shocking.