• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What response was he expecting??

    “TAX THE RICH!!!”

    “So your solution is to tax the rich?”

    “Oh… Well now that you put it that way… No I guess not.”

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I mean think about it guy you’ve been cutting taxes for the Rich for 50 years and the debt has gone up remarkably. It ain’t rocket science.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      From 1980 to 2008 there was a perfect correlation between whether a Republican or Democrat was in the oval office and whether the debt was blowing up insanely or actually being paid off (Clinton, the lone Democratic President during that period, actually had a budget surplus the last two years of his Presidency). Unfortunately, it was still impossible to get Republicans to believe that the ballooning debt wasn’t the Democrats’ fault - “tax and spend liberals” etc. etc. Then Obama joined in the “deficits don’t matter” parade as did Biden, and now you can’t even use actual facts to try and convince people that Republicans are as far from being “fiscal conservatives” as it’s possible to be.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “So your proposal to solve (the debt) is to tax the rich?”

    “So your proposal to solve the empty gas tank is to put gas in the tank?”

    “So your proposal to solve the dog getting out of the yard is to repair the fence?”

    “So your proposal to solve the problem of not being able to see is to put on your glasses?”

    Bro. It’s the most obvious solution. It also has the added benefit of being the only one that’s proven to work.

    Being a representative whose mind doesn’t immediately jump to that solution is like being a truck driver and not immediately jumping to the solution of slamming on the brakes when you’re speeding toward a red light: it’s not a difference of opinion or policy, it’s dangerous negligence. Why are you holding meetings about this? If you’re dedicated to not slamming on the brakes, just try swerving into the daycare playground or whatever your twisted idea is. Don’t hold a town hall asking for a rubber stamp on plowing through the toddlers, and definitely don’t act surprised when your constituents react in horror and propose using the brakes instead.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Tax the rich!

    …And we voted in the wealthiest man in history and a narcissistic luxury hotel magnate, who openly touted a regressive tax plan, to do it?

    • Somehow they’ve been convinced that the lower/middle class pays taxes so migrants and other minorities can live like the people they elected and Republicans are the ones fighting to protect them from Democrats who want all their money.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Whom also has a factual history of being a con man, rapist, adulterer, and outright horrible person.

  • waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How about “where’s the whole video, where’s the whole video”. I like where this was going, but would love to see where it went. I can’t find it. Anyone have a link to the entire thing?

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m not sure if it’s the full town hall, but the one thing I was able to find that was more than a few minutes long was this video titled “Republican Town Hall LIVE | Congressman Mike Flood NOT Afraid to Listen to his District”

      https://www.youtube.com/live/GW2hRMYVhjQ

      https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=GW2hRMYVhjQ

      That title seemed a little biased to me, so I looked up its Wikipedia page, and guess who founded News Channel Nebraska?

      So, yeah, it’s entirely possible there was some deceptive editing or some other nonsense, also it’s entirely possible that video will disappear if their founder decides it’s bad for him to have this out there

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m sure whatever he said after that clip ends was in effort to gaslight that crowd into thinking taxing the rich is somehow a bad thing.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 hours ago

        We now have 5 decades of solid evidence that trickle-down economics don’t work. Anyone still claiming the contrary is either a) delusional or b) rich.

        • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          48
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I loved the “job creators” argument because it is super easy to disprove.

          If my company that has one employee makes twice the profits off the same number of orders as it made last year Im not hiring anyone because I don’t need to despite being able to afford it. What would make me hire someone else is the volume of orders increasing past the point where I can fill them hence the customers are the job creators.

          • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            7 hours ago

            And customers are created by average people having disposable income. Want jobs created? Tax the rich and spread that to the working class. EZPZ.

            • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Working class working directly for other working class instead of corpos and billionaires is the wealth class’s worst nightmare because it makes it obvious to the average person nobody needs a wealth class, and they are leeching from society without doing anything productive for civilization.

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Right?

                This came up in another thread but folks were talking about how the rich don’t even like build libraries and theaters anymore. They don’t even pretend to care. They just build bunkers and yachts.

    • smokinliver
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Wont take long until they reintroduce taring and feathering.

  • bayernspezl@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How long do you think it will take, that trump ist making the words “Tax the Rich” a illegal pharse because i dont know … Maybe terrorism or some other stupid cause for that phrase?

    • Lasherz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’re all temporarily embarrassed billionaires confused about the order in which they’re supposed to climb and kick the ladder.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because I might be rich someday, and if that happens I’m going to want even more money. Or something like that.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I wonder if we could make any headway arguing that taxes were automated trickling down. We had the rich, and we all benefit from things like roads.