• Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I was never a fan of Netscape. For whatever reason, it always felt like it was so much slower than ie and web pages would often be broken.

  • Gerowen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It had the best loading animation with the comets flying by. Much better than IE rotating and becoming the planet earth. This was back when you actually had to wait for pages to load.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yes.

    I even remember using Gopher which was the closest there was to HTTP and Browsers before they were invented.

    (Also, don’t get me started on FTPmail).

    And no, even with the enshittification of the last decade or so, I would still not call those “the good old days”.

    Now, get out of my lawn you wipper snappers!

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I have used the same web browser, in terms of ideology, codebase, and heritage, for nearly a third of a century, now.

    NCSA Mosaic -> Netscape -> Phoenix/Firebird/Firefox.

    I now hew more to alternates such as LibreWolf and Floorp, but I still run Firefox EME-Free as my default.

  • Simulation6
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I worked at a company pre-internet that had an Arpanet connection. I started working there as a Cobol programmer and thought this was magic. I later got to set up a dial -up uucp network to customer sites. I think I still have some 300 baud rabbit ears I used to monitor systems from home.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, of course. We also had a notebook (these paper-based thingies, not a digital one) in the terminal room where we collected interesting web site addresses back then before Altavista and bookmarks.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I had a Popular Science magazine that included the 50 coolest websites you should visit. That was mine. I still get hit with so much nostalgia about it. They were legit so cool that they still put most websites I see nowadays to shame.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Of course. alt.binaries.pictures.erotica - not an internet address in case you wonder, but a NNTP group. Yes, we had social media back then, just not with Nazis, bots, and ads.

        • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes, we had social media back then, just not with Nazis, bots, and ads.

          We did have plenty of usenet trolls and usenet wars.

          • mystik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            We had killfiles back then. And clients that sorted/threaded conversations the way we wanted. And upstream operators that could often physically visit the offenders to tell them to knock if off. Those were the days …

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Most bulletin boards like fidonet existed in parallel with the internet, and even used internet bridges to transfer mail and files across long distances where a dialup connection could not be used.

            NNTP actally was quite network agnostic, the messages did not care about the means of transport. I actually handled a NNTP link back then via floppy disk.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Nah… Netscape Navigator Gold was peak. Netscape Communicator was too bloated and took forever to load. Sure it had an email client, HTML editor, etc. but these should have been separate programs, not all built into a single thing. The original mozilla browser was also this way until Phoenix Firebird Firefox pulled a browser out of the bloated mess.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember thinking Netscape was way cooler than IE based purely on the throbber animation

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          in case you didn’t know: the animated icon (usually the cursor) that indicates background processing is called a throbber.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Agreed. 1999-2000 was also peak internet for me. Netscape, Napster, Neopets, Newgrounds, and Nick.com (and StarCraft multiplayer). It didn’t get any better than that.

      • fulcrummed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Limewire… downloading all your favourite songs, wait no… typing in names of any song you could think of in hopes you’d find it. Then you did find it and it turned out to be the same damn song you can’t stand with the file misnamed. A whole generation grew up confused about who sang their favourite songs, and found constant frustration in waiting like 12min (on a great day) for Smells Like Teen Spirit to download, only to find they got Weird Al Yankovich’s parody instead… like 4 times in a row from four different files. Ahhhh memories.

    • I’ve seen that some dude on here has the Netscape throbber (for Gen Z: that’s what the animated doohickey in the corner that shows your page is still loading and your computer has not frozen is called) as his profile icon.

      Maybe you’ve just summoned him up, Beetlejuice style.

    • brookdale05@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah yes web 2.0 was also a thing. I remember.

      I’ll never forget watching pictures roll in line-by-line on dialup back in 1995 or so.

  • laranis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok, going to scream into the abyss here…

    I had Netscape on my 486DX2-66 with a 33.6 modem. Win 95, along with ICQ, mIRC, some NNTP reader I can’t recall… You get the picture.

    Everyone I’ve told this to thinks I must have been out of my mind. But for a period of time that I recall as months I had some sort of phenomenon where Netscape would stop loading a web page (could take 10s of seconds, you know) unless you MOVED THE MOUSE. Continuously. The animated “N” on would freeze and if you didn’t move the mouse the page would just be blank, or partially loaded. Move the mouse, it resumes. Stop moving the mouse, it stops. I used to have to move my mouse in figure-eights, cajoling the machine to not give up and keep downloading.

    You’ll think I’m crazy, too. But when I share this story I keep hoping someone, somewhere had the same experience. And maybe, someone who knows what was going on will chime in on some obscure IRQ conflict in Windows along with some optimization used by Netscape in one iteration caused this bug for a brief moment in time.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure I had that same mouse movement thing happen. That was a deeply buried memory until you mentioned it .

    • HyonoKo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ahh…. I was there my friend. Similar setup, 486 DX4 100, USRobotics modem. I had the IRQ conflict. Me and my friend figured out how to change the channels by reading the mainboard‘s manual. I had to change some jumpers around. It was my first modem and I had never connected to the internet before.

    • zebbedi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      On linux /dev/random will use inputs such as mouse movement to generate random data. If a program needs random data for something such as encryption it will seemingly hang whilst it generates enough. This isn’t good on servers without an active user so you configure it to use /dev/urandom instead. Perhaps windows had similar back in the day.

    • imvii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Going from Netscape 1 to Netscape 2 which supported animated gifs. What a day that was!