^^^

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 小时前

    The monopoly case against MS was bullshit. They had all kinds of bad business practices to go after and they decided to go after them for including a web browser in the OS. They fucking made the whole process a waste of time.

    • misk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 小时前

      Pressure on their web browser monopoly was necessary because IE6 was stifling entire industry. From a legal point of view it’s not illegal to be a monopoly but to abuse that position so there isn’t that much you can do about it, especially in the US. Going after operating system or office suite monopoly should have been done but matters less and less these days.

      • Banzai51@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 小时前

        I reject that idea. The argument is that users are too stupid. MS never prevented me from installing and using Chrome or Firefox or any other browser.

        • misk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 分钟前

          MS prevented you from using other browsers by using vendor lock-in. It was a prime example example of now misunderstood concept of embrace, extend, extinguish. You could download Mozilla Phoenix but you couldn’t use it for everything because CSS rendering in IE was so detached from standards. On top of that you had ActiveX which meant you HAD to use Windows for some websites.