• superkret@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      I was legit baffled by how such a shit peace of software could become so ubiquitous – until I got to know SAP and realized that Teams isn’t even in the bottom half of enterprise software quality.

  • bokherif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The “pro” versions of common social media apps that remove ads or give you a useless check mark.

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    For me, any office apps. Never worked in an office, never wanted to. None of that stuff. Even if it’s free, if it gets installed with the distro, it’s the first thing that gets tossed.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I recently tried out an “LED banner” (called LED scroller in the google play store) app that lets you scroll text on your screen. Pretty cool, I would totally pay $5 or maybe even $10 for it. In the free version, I don’t think I’ve ever seen that many ads in such a short period of time. The paid version was $15 PER WEEK. That’s $780 per year. To scroll some text. It’s the only app I’ve ever bothered to post a review for.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    90% of b2b software. They literally charge thousands of dollars while giving the worse piece of shit software you’ve ever used.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They always want to charge per user too instead of just charging a monthly fee. They’d rather have no money than not charge per user it’s actual crazy. Imagine any other industry turning away paying customers when it doesn’t cost them anything to have the customer. Software companies are insane. Can’t wait until their funding runs out.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Oof. Yes!

      The proprietary cloud crap usually has worse or non-existent documentation, fewer features, and a terrible or non-existent API.

      But it comes with a salesperson. So there’s that.

      But people with cloud server orchestration skills are terrifyingly expensive right now, so self-hosting a better product can be a very hard sell.

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Hmm really? Would proficiency with Terraform and knowledge of the services offered by at least one major cloud provider be considered “cloud server orchestration skills” or do you mean something more/different?

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yep! My best guess is that maybe 1 in 10 organizations currently has any in-house orchestration skills on staff at all.

          (I’m just annecdotaly guessing based on my professional network, which is actually heavily biased towards organizations that have orchestration skills, but also based on job offers that my peers with orchestration skills are seeing.)

          And the ones that have it get to charge a premium for shitty cloud services to the ones that do not.

          • Benjaben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            That’s pretty crazy, good to know. We had a hard time hiring a “cloud engineer” last year ourselves, though for the client in question we were looking for deep Azure chops. I’ve been learning some Terraform for this reason so we can respond a bit better, sounds like I might be well served to focus on it. Feel like DM’ing with salaries / offers you’ve been hearing about, if you have?

    • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sometimes the value add is security, sometimes scaling or uptime. Enterprise considerations aren’t necessarily the same as for individual consumers.

      Sometimes it’s just a dogshit product though, and the sales team pulled the wool over some execs eyes.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          In this case it’s not “security”, it’s offloading the responsibility of security to a 3rd party.

          If the enterprise app leaks data, they’re the ones responsible. Not you, the IT guy who chose it

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oh fuck yeah! So much of my research into new tools is just checking to see if they have a demo, documentation, and price.

      When I’m looking for a new tool, I don’t have the time to schedule a “quick” 20 minute call to do introductions and schedule a follow-up hour long meeting followed by a quote sent over in an email days later only to find out the price is so far outside the range there is no way it’s ever going to happen!

      I’m not some useless middle manager looking for any excuse to look busy; I don’t have that kind of time to waste!

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Paid calculator apps.

    Not only are many of them paid - but they are subscription as well. Imagine paying a monthly fee for your goddamn calculator.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I have mixed feelings here. I legitimately paid ($1, once, a decade ago) for a calculator app and feel it was a great value (I still prefer it to this day). But then again the free version was fine too and the one-time payment was essentially a donation to the developer for a great app that unlocked… Themes…

      • AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I like that model. You get to try the software for free and have a way to thank the developer and get something extra, rather than just a pure donation.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, I paid for PCalc because someone put in effort to make it, and it’s good. Don’t feel bad about that.

        But I wouldn’t subscribe to one.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        F-Droid has an Android port of the Unix maxima, which is a whole free and open-source computer algebra system, that handles all my heavier lifting. And I’m pretty sure that every phone that I’ve ever seen ships with at a software package that can act as a five-function calculator, if someone is just looking for something simple.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Money laundering? Or just going kids download on devices with their parents data to go unnoticed for months at a time?

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      In a sense this is great news. If you ever need to earn some money (somehow, anyhow) you now know that there are people out they who willingly pay a subscription for their calculator.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    it’s not an entire app but, discord profile decorations.

    The fact it costs money isn’t surprising, but the amount of money charged is hilarious.

    17$ for some graphics that some look like they took about 20 minutes to make. Just to make your profile look different than everyone elses. Then the “discount” given for having nitro for it is even more laughable.

    Whats equally insane is that people fall for it. I know some people that have easily spent 60$ on profile decorations. Spending equal or greater than the cost of discord nitro is insane to me, even if the decoration doesn’t expire.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      what bothers me even more than the price is that they all suck, and none of them fit my aesthetic. I could make my own decorations, and I’m offended that discord won’t let me.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Holy fuck, as if I needed more reasons to hate Discord… back when I thought it was just a new iteration of xFire I still hated it but could at least see a purpose for it, but it doesn’t even do all the shit xFire could

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Xfire was the shit. I’d have paid a couple bucks a month for it, instead of it just dying. It was so crazy ahead of its time. Text chat, voice, game detection and tracking, clans, server browsing, broadcasting, pic and video hosting…

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The thing that I find insane is having to pay for Nitro to have an animated .gif as your profile pic.

      …The animation is played client-side, so literally costs Discord nothing to do this, and as a matter of fact it’s actually more effort for them to intentionally block animations from playing until you pony up than just letting the browser container the app runs in natively do its thing. Given that the Discord app itself is basically just a glorified webview container with some stuff bolted onto it.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      On a similar note, skins and other cosmetics in video games that do nothing to help with camouflage—or worse—make you stand out more. Never understood why people waste money on that.

      • Hagdos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I can see that for a free game that you enjoy a lot, and want to reward with some money. You can make a donation, or get a silly skin for the same money (and have it visible that you donated some).

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Difference is that that shit sometimes looks cool as hell and you see your skin constantly while playing(at least if you play in third person). You won’t stare at your profile picture for hours.

  • Venicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Not useless as such but a wallpaper app or something that expects you to pay £5.99 a month to use. Fuck all the way off with that

    • Graphy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Didn’t MKBHD launch some wallpaper app for $12 a month? I heard about it and just figured he was another tech YouTuber who lost touch

      • Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        He did actually do a really good honest apology for that, restructuring pricing and improving on the app, but then he did the thing of the commentor above me, which was worse.

      • Thales@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        14 hours ago

        He then follows up that face plant by getting caught going 85 MPH in a school zone. MKHB is crashing out hard.

        • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Pretty sure he lives in New Jersey, the rest of America doesn’t know he was being passed while in that school zone. Driving is different up there

  • kaprap@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Real Debrid

    Touted as necessary when it isn’t, apparently if you have it you have access to a huge cache that you can use to continue to torrent dead files

    The issue is that most files nowadays are torrented anyway, so it’s essentially just a ‘do it because I told you so’ step for torrentio users.

    Other torrent streaming software don’t even need real Debrid.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I discovered it only a while ago and during that time it has been clearly neutered. It just doesn’t work for stuff like it used to.

      Most likely copyright strikes caught up to it

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A few months ago they got told to quit it so they were like “oh shit apparently there are PIRATES using our piracy service. We never wanted THOSE GUYS as our customers!” and started neutering piracy, which was clearly their main source of income.

    • cashsky@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Isn’t it kind of a middle-man service so you don’t get narc’d on by your ISP for large amounts of p2p traffic? That way all your ISP sees is you downloading data from one source rather than lots of.p2p traffic.

      Unless you use vpn obviously, that doesn’t have issues with p2p traffic or whatever.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And in many countries downloading is just fine, sharing isn’t.

        And in a torrent swarm you always share (yes there are modded clients, but they’re a niche), making it risky

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I remember when the iPhone was new and my friend paid money for an app that simulates a mug of beer on the screen so you can pretend to drink it.

    That, but the entire genre of those fucking things cuz there are assloads of them now.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Novelty apps were practically the majority of what was out there in the early days of Android and iOS. I remember a lighter app, and an electric shaver app.

      My favorite novelty app was that marble maze game on iOS they used the accelerometer. I got really good at finishing those mazes in seconds, which upset my cousin because it was his phone and I demolished all his best times, lol. Only video game I was ever good at.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’ve never really understood the imitation app developers. Like your first little run of the novelty, sure, makes sense, minimal effort that might pay itself off or even go viral, but why do the imitations think they have the same shot?

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    There used to be apps in the iOS app store that were nothing but a big “I’m rich” symbol. They would be listed for some shit like $10,000 in the app store and all they did was,at best, have a button that played a sound to indicate that you were in fact rich lol.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Those “I’m rich” apps basically tested the app store price limit which was set to $9,999 (don’t know if it’s different now). Brilliant idea really.

      I put this in the same category as the “Million dollar homepage” where some guy asked for $1 a pixel and hosted a page with the results. Something smart that if it gets enough attention could make someone good money for not a lot of work. And generally something that will only work once as copycats won’t be seen to have the same value.

    • puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      huh? i use boost (and used to use it for reddit before the whole API thing) and haven’t ever seen it ask for money or anything

      • swab148@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Same, it shows ads, but they’re pretty easy to block. I paid for it just to help support the dev, he seems pretty cool.

          • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If you’re really the dev, please add support for spoilers, it’s the only thing that makes me consider a different app. I’ve also been using Boost since Reddit, and I have a feeling spoiler tags worked there, but that was long ago and my memory is not that good.