• harc@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Microsoft Sharepoint has a Wiki. The Wiki can not generate a table of content.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    All the free widgets that used to come preinstalled in Android before Google killed them to save the extra $2 of development cost from their yearly interns.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Full price EA games with F2P-style microtransactions and ads

    And this isn’t useless, but I can’t believe that to rent Photoshop for $20/mo, your creative projects are not your IP…

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And that despite charging for it, they fill many versions of it with adverts, install without asking bloatware and crap paid for by other companies to shove down your throat, and also sells your personal information to (checks) at least 801 third parties.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Hey! Those 801 third parties are trusted third parties. All of them were properly vetted when they said they wouldn’t misuse our personal data.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Oh, you’re going to update without notifying me and then not restart?

      You truly are the paramount of usefulness, Teams.

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was legit baffled by how such a shit peace of software could become so ubiquitous – until I got to know SAP and realized that Teams isn’t even in the bottom half of enterprise software quality.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        A someone who has used and supported teams, WebEx Skype and crazy shit I don’t even remember anymore, Teams is downright reliable and user friendly.

      • Yaky@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        I thought SAP was shit until I worked with Microsoft Dynamics NAV, an ERP from alternate 1990s hell dimension. It has a built-in IDE that uses its own language called C/AL (syntactically similar to Pascal). The only source control is developers’ ability to lock files they are working on. And the code editor is worse than notepad. Seriously, it does not allow to select or paste multiple lines, and in general, acts as if each line is it’s own textbox. Forget about syntax highlighting or anything else other than black text on white background.

        And, AFAIK, if your company needs to customize it, you are required to hire a “Microsoft-certified” NAV developer.

        • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Allow me to regale you with a tale of Sun Identity Manager and XPRESS. A strange mangling of xml and pseudo javascript-esque pile of shit used for identity transformations for disparate systems.

          On second thought, let’s just not. I’d rather let that PTSD inducing memory slowly fade away, much like SunIDM did after Larry bought them to poach their customer base.

      • talos_the_true_god@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Have you tried webex? It’s like teams but on dumb-‘roids, the notifications are shot, the messages always pull your taskbar up, calls always get routed to either the wrong input or output, calls drop half the time… and the list goes on and on…

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The online version means I don’t ever have to boot into windows to use all the M365 stuff at work, so it gets a “thanks Microsoft!” from me.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    The German Dreckstool website (meaning shit tool) hosts a hitlist of shitty tools/software. I don’t think it’s that popular, but the top/high-scored of the list may be indicative of some of the worst.

    • S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Outlook should be way higher. I cannot believe how in tarnation I cannot view the reply they gave me if I’m standing in my sent folder. I have to copy past the subject and searchthe mail again on my inbox. And the ficking alerts that don’t trigger at friggin all WTF?

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I hate the sent folder in the first place.

        Old outlook had a setting to place sent emails next to the replied to email. That worked for all folders, except the inbox.

        In Thunderbird I let it place sent emails always next to the context.

        In the new Outlook, after every send, I have to go into sent and move it to the correct folder. (I have many folders for structure of various concerns.)

    • superkret@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I googled nr. 1 and watched their promotional video.
      Sooooo many buzzwords. From their marketing material, I have literally no idea what the software even does, but I can already tell it’s utter shit.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Our shit setup at work, where I am now using two browsers and two email programs because our Jira and Confluence can’t be arsed to decently support web standards/Firefox and because Outlook is shit but Exchange has stuff I need Outlook for.

    Today was the first time, after yet again something not working - issues on confluence and Jira ticket can’t be closed, endless load on Firefox - where I genuinely felt relieved that a very different website for file transfer simply worked. I could open it, click download, and download the file.

    It’s absurd that I feel this way.

    Atlassian is shit for forcing us into the expensive cloud for a shit product. Our Jira and Confluence have plugins, and we pay admin company to integrate more customizations, and it just makes everything worse. The “changes only happen at night” I read from Atlassian is pointless because without notice or announcement stuff breaks anyway, and I have no idea who makes changes and when and what, because nothing is being communicated. Today was the third time we weren’t able to add work time to tickets. Let’s see when the next time will be.

    It’s a constant annoyance and stumbling over shit tools.

    I have various CSS hacks in place to make Jira and Confluence more usable, but it’s still shit. And man their HTML DOM is absolutely horrendous with only generated classes. Most of my CSS hacks use test ID attributes.

    Shit Atlassian, shit Jira and Confluence, shit customizations. Annoying Outlook and Exchange.

    Man this became a long text and rant lol

    Unfortunately, they’re not useless but apparently necessary. I don’t see us ever moving away from them.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Atlassian is shit for forcing us into the expensive cloud for a shit product.

      I feel your pain. Or rather, I felt it once and am now freed!

      We were big into Atalassian when they announced they were going cloud only. We had on-prem versions of Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket

      We pretty quickly said “Fuck that”, mostly because we have an on-prem policy for IP protection.

      I was pretty happy to spend some time searching for replacements, mostly because it was my job to apply upgrades to these steaming, tottering piles of badly written java horseshit. They looked pretty, but the upgrade process was convoluted and quite often failed terminally. I still think that the difficulty of upgrading the hosted versions was a driver towards cloud only, mostly because it exposed how shite the things were and how many complaints they must have got for offering an on-prem product that was so hard to maintain, despite looking pretty.

      I take some pleasure that the Atlassian share price is now half what it was before they did this.

      (If anyone was interested; Confluence and Jira were replaced by Youtrack. Bitbucket by Teamcity. Both by Jetbrains, both much easier to upgrade (Teamcity is web-based one-click), and our licencing costs are about half what we paid to Atlassian)

      • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I cannot count the number of times I was able to fire off an email with a status update to the PM “JIRA is down, again, I completed XYZ, update your gantt charts, my part is done.” I know that they paid a whole team of folks to craft the interrelations of those tasks for a system that hardly ever worked.

  • bokherif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The “pro” versions of common social media apps that remove ads or give you a useless check mark.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    ·
    2 days ago

    Paid calculator apps.

    Not only are many of them paid - but they are subscription as well. Imagine paying a monthly fee for your goddamn calculator.

    • _vote@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Calculator emulators are the way. Wabbit for ti-84 and similar, and hp prime (official) for a full CAS.

    • Opisek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      After a long time of using CalcES on my android phone and cheating the ads away with PiHole, I finally spent the very little fee for the pro edition. The app is amazing and the creator absolutely deserves it.

    • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Pretty sure I paid for some Ti and HP calc emulators at some point. Only a couple bucks each, worth it at the time. Would not pay to subscribe though.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      97
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have mixed feelings here. I legitimately paid ($1, once, a decade ago) for a calculator app and feel it was a great value (I still prefer it to this day). But then again the free version was fine too and the one-time payment was essentially a donation to the developer for a great app that unlocked… Themes…

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I paid for PCalc because someone put in effort to make it, and it’s good. Don’t feel bad about that.

        But I wouldn’t subscribe to one.

      • AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like that model. You get to try the software for free and have a way to thank the developer and get something extra, rather than just a pure donation.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        F-Droid has an Android port of the Unix maxima, which is a whole free and open-source computer algebra system, that handles all my heavier lifting. And I’m pretty sure that every phone that I’ve ever seen ships with at a software package that can act as a five-function calculator, if someone is just looking for something simple.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Money laundering? Or just going kids download on devices with their parents data to go unnoticed for months at a time?

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      In a sense this is great news. If you ever need to earn some money (somehow, anyhow) you now know that there are people out they who willingly pay a subscription for their calculator.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    90% of b2b software. They literally charge thousands of dollars while giving the worse piece of shit software you’ve ever used.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They always want to charge per user too instead of just charging a monthly fee. They’d rather have no money than not charge per user it’s actual crazy. Imagine any other industry turning away paying customers when it doesn’t cost them anything to have the customer. Software companies are insane. Can’t wait until their funding runs out.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Oof. Yes!

      The proprietary cloud crap usually has worse or non-existent documentation, fewer features, and a terrible or non-existent API.

      But it comes with a salesperson. So there’s that.

      But people with cloud server orchestration skills are terrifyingly expensive right now, so self-hosting a better product can be a very hard sell.

      • wookiepedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The Salesperson is incredibly important. They take the person responsible for making the purchase decision out to lunch and for rounds of golf, after all!

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hmm really? Would proficiency with Terraform and knowledge of the services offered by at least one major cloud provider be considered “cloud server orchestration skills” or do you mean something more/different?

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yep! My best guess is that maybe 1 in 10 organizations currently has any in-house orchestration skills on staff at all.

          (I’m just annecdotaly guessing based on my professional network, which is actually heavily biased towards organizations that have orchestration skills, but also based on job offers that my peers with orchestration skills are seeing.)

          And the ones that have it get to charge a premium for shitty cloud services to the ones that do not.

          • Benjaben@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s pretty crazy, good to know. We had a hard time hiring a “cloud engineer” last year ourselves, though for the client in question we were looking for deep Azure chops. I’ve been learning some Terraform for this reason so we can respond a bit better, sounds like I might be well served to focus on it. Feel like DM’ing with salaries / offers you’ve been hearing about, if you have?

    • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sometimes the value add is security, sometimes scaling or uptime. Enterprise considerations aren’t necessarily the same as for individual consumers.

      Sometimes it’s just a dogshit product though, and the sales team pulled the wool over some execs eyes.

    • Godnroc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh fuck yeah! So much of my research into new tools is just checking to see if they have a demo, documentation, and price.

      When I’m looking for a new tool, I don’t have the time to schedule a “quick” 20 minute call to do introductions and schedule a follow-up hour long meeting followed by a quote sent over in an email days later only to find out the price is so far outside the range there is no way it’s ever going to happen!

      I’m not some useless middle manager looking for any excuse to look busy; I don’t have that kind of time to waste!

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I recently tried out an “LED banner” (called LED scroller in the google play store) app that lets you scroll text on your screen. Pretty cool, I would totally pay $5 or maybe even $10 for it. In the free version, I don’t think I’ve ever seen that many ads in such a short period of time. The paid version was $15 PER WEEK. That’s $780 per year. To scroll some text. It’s the only app I’ve ever bothered to post a review for.

    • cashsky@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sounds like a front for either blatant adware or malware with botted reviews/downloads to bring it to the top in search results. I can’t image there isn’t a free app that does this.

        • pory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s just fishing. For every 10 users that notice the deceptive “free trial then bills per week” model, there’s a guy who doesn’t notice until he’s been charged $15 and cancels. And for every ten of that guy, there’s a guy that doesn’t notice for a month, and for every ten of that guy there’s the rare whale who looks at their $700/mo “google bill” and goes yeah that sounds about right.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I remember writing one of those using a bitmap font from some Arduino LCD driver program and publishing it for free on the Android store. Someone offered £50 for the source code and I wonder if they’re related.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    it’s not an entire app but, discord profile decorations.

    The fact it costs money isn’t surprising, but the amount of money charged is hilarious.

    17$ for some graphics that some look like they took about 20 minutes to make. Just to make your profile look different than everyone elses. Then the “discount” given for having nitro for it is even more laughable.

    Whats equally insane is that people fall for it. I know some people that have easily spent 60$ on profile decorations. Spending equal or greater than the cost of discord nitro is insane to me, even if the decoration doesn’t expire.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      And the animations on them are so obnoxious I actively add custom CSS to remove them.
      Vencord FTW

    • Oberyn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Also how discord dœs stickers . Like custom emojes , they’re tied to discord servers , unless you have nitro then you can use them everywhere . Such BS system , shoulda done them how LINE dœs them : you only need to buy the sticker pack once then you use them anywhere , no shitty subscription needed !

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      what bothers me even more than the price is that they all suck, and none of them fit my aesthetic. I could make my own decorations, and I’m offended that discord won’t let me.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing that I find insane is having to pay for Nitro to have an animated .gif as your profile pic.

      …The animation is played client-side, so literally costs Discord nothing to do this, and as a matter of fact it’s actually more effort for them to intentionally block animations from playing until you pony up than just letting the browser container the app runs in natively do its thing. Given that the Discord app itself is basically just a glorified webview container with some stuff bolted onto it.

      • randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t want to sound like I’m on Discord’s side (I dislike nitro too), but that’s honestly just how a lot of paid add-on features on free apps work. They take away some functionality from the free one to incentivize people to pay.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      On a similar note, skins and other cosmetics in video games that do nothing to help with camouflage—or worse—make you stand out more. Never understood why people waste money on that.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Early days of of micro-transactions did help you blend in more, but I noticed they started diverging away, leaving the more natural camos to be unlocked by gameplay, and the obnoxious/distracting ones as a premium.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Difference is that that shit sometimes looks cool as hell and you see your skin constantly while playing(at least if you play in third person). You won’t stare at your profile picture for hours.

      • Hagdos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can see that for a free game that you enjoy a lot, and want to reward with some money. You can make a donation, or get a silly skin for the same money (and have it visible that you donated some).

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Holy fuck, as if I needed more reasons to hate Discord… back when I thought it was just a new iteration of xFire I still hated it but could at least see a purpose for it, but it doesn’t even do all the shit xFire could

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Xfire was the shit. I’d have paid a couple bucks a month for it, instead of it just dying. It was so crazy ahead of its time. Text chat, voice, game detection and tracking, clans, server browsing, broadcasting, pic and video hosting…

  • Venicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not useless as such but a wallpaper app or something that expects you to pay £5.99 a month to use. Fuck all the way off with that