• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s the first part, used correctly it’s a non issue so just use your nonstick correctly.

    • snowe@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      recent studies have stated that the pans offgas from manufacturing for weeks after you’ve bought them, no heating needed, so no, that’s not correct. and it was known that they offgas at only 325ºF years ago. https://www.ewg.org/research/canaries-kitchen

      so no, teflon pans are bad no matter how you use them, they’re bad for the environment, they’re bad for your health, they’re bad for animals, they’re bad for babies that haven’t been born yet.

    • endeavor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Using nonstick correctly: Dont use anything but silicone spatulas on it, do not use more than 50% of your stoves power or gas stove or you will get cancer and die. Buy a new one every 5 years anyway since it somehow became stick pan.

      Using stainless pan: Find it from some junk metal pile, discover it was manufactured in the roman empire, give it a good scrub. Use it on any source imaginable and when hawk thuah slides around instead of sizzles, it’s good to go.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Using nonstick correctly: Don’t use metal and don’t heat it over 260 °C

      • brad_troika (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Source on the pan giving you cancer?

        Yes, non-stick becomes stick because the teflon coating comes off, it’s really hard to make teflon stick to anything. Using metal utensils will hasten this but afaik simply using heat will help loosen the teflon coating.

        I don’t mind buying a new non-stick pan about every 5 years (last one lasted 7), I usuall stick to the cheapest ones, they serve a specific service to me that stainless ones can’t do.

        • endeavor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Are you really asking “provide proofs of a pan I am warned to not heat up too much as the vapours will cause flu like symptoms and kill pet avians is bad for my health.” is bad for you? It is. Why do you think you need to buy new pans every x years? Cause the non-stick layer wears off. Do bits of coating that contain top tier carciogens which are considered safe unless ingested magically vanish into the void? Yes. Except the void is your body.

          I have been relying on my teflons less and less the more I get good with the stainless. I’ve now been making crepes and japanese omlets with less sticking than my few years old teflons.

          • brad_troika (he/him)@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            Afaik the coating is not a carcinogen only under certain circumstances like high heat can it produce something unsafe but even there it’s just potential, not yet proved to be carcinogenic but feel free to prove me wrong.

            • endeavor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/chemicals/teflon-and-perfluorooctanoic-acid-pfoa.html It says it ssafe since it’s tightly bound to the pan. I guess its true, its completely 100% safe. After all, there is no reason for anyone who owns a non stick pan to ever buy a new one since they keep being nonstick for generations, right? Surely even if you treat your pan just as they say, it means the coating doesn’t wear off, right? And us educated people we know once something wears via abrasion it means it leaves behind no residue, right?

              • brad_troika (he/him)@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Are we reading the same article? It doesn’t say it’s bound to the pan. Why bother to choose a source that you don’t read and disagrees with you?

                • endeavor
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  It is bound to the pan. It is the non stick layer.

                  Now, do non stick pans stay non stick forever? Why do non stick pans fail to stay non stick? What happens to the non stick coating and where does it go when it is no longer bound to the pan?

                  • brad_troika (he/him)@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    I’m out of my element here but my understanding is that the chemicals in the FDA article are not the non stick layer, it was used in creating it and is bound to it. While I wouldn’t suggest eating it (the coating) and can be harmful when heated to levels uncommon (but not impossible) in a kitchen environment there’s no proof that teflon dishes can increase the chance of cancer.

          • brad_troika (he/him)@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            The part you quoted says nothing about cancer, article only mentions potential risks with no evidence and no article cited. I’m sorry but articles like these are why people believe chocolate cures cancer or sitting down is as bad as smoking.

            I don’t claim there’s no connection but so far I’ve seen no evidence.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I bought a cheap stainless pan about 20 years ago. Don’t have issues with food sticking, don’t have to worry abouy coatings coming off, and if the handle breaks I can make a new one.

          Coating breaks down, stainless doesn’t.

          • nomy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I have a mix of stainless steel and cast iron. I’m not terribly worried about consuming small amounts of either of those.

            A bonus is that because it’s all metal I can use most of it in ovens or while cooking outdoors.

            Sticking isn’t really that much of an issue if you’re careful. I feel like non-stick would’ve never taken off if people knew how toxic it was in 1970.

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      In other words don’t do what I did and put half a litre into a $6 pot on your new induction cooktop and set it to 2kW to see how long it takes to boil.

      It boils quick.

      It then boils more enthusiastically than you’ve ever seen before, and a cancerous stench fills the air as the coating breaks down and the pot deforms.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Like throw it away every 6 months.

      Edit: or 1 or 2 years, it was hyperbole. Instead of like never throwing it out?

      • pistonfish@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The nonstick pans I’ve using are several years old now without any signs of deteriorating nonstick surfaces. Use cookware out of wood or plastic to not scrape off the coating.

        • endeavor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have 1 big nonstick and 1 small nonstick. They never saw high heat, they never saw ANY metal instruments, when stored they are protected by felt so nothing hard touches them, they never seen a steel sponge and they still became regular stick pans 2 years into their lifespan. Before you say “skill issue buying the pan” they were mid level (expensive pans for no cooks) pans from a reputable company. I have been a pro chef as well. Nonsticks are a wear item even if you treat them like shit on a stick. My oldest stainless is like 40 years old, has a huge dent on the side and works the same as it did on day one. I dug it out of someones fishing shed.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I have a kitchen full of nonstick pans. They’ve been in use since my grandma’s mom.

            Got them from grandma.

            Don’t freak out but cast iron was the OG nonstick, right?

            • endeavor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              All it takes to become a chef is to accept the back breaking underpaid labour of working in a kitchen and following instructions. There are no preliminary requirements, only time invested.

              • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I raise the BS flag. A chef is responsible for creating and planning the restaurant menu, which means they have to create dishes that fit the restaurant niche and local customer base’s interest, while also fitting the recipes into the workflow of the kitchen setup, ingredient availability from suppliers, etc. They have to worry about prep capacity, yield percentages vs cost of the menu items, etc.

                I studied culinary arts and worked in the restaurant industry for eight years before I got out. There is a difference between a chef and a cook and a kitchen manager. Were you a line lead, or kitchen manager? I might buy that.

                The chef is not just someone who wants to break their back until they make it up the hierarchy, they’re usually the one who is passionate enough that AFTER breaking their back all day they go home and STILL COOK. I went home after 14 hour days and made cereal or whatever because I was sick of cooking.

                Never once have I ever heard an actual chef call themselves a “professional chef.” Most actual chefs I’ve met are snobbishly anti-nonstick as well, but that’s not necessarily a rule. ALL of them could make a Teflon pan last more than a year or two.

                Your comments stink, I don’t buy it, unless you were a glorified kitchen manager that the restaurant called a “chef” but you had no real job in making the menu or new recipes.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If you use it incorrectly then yeah. You might as well stop making food as well because clearly you don’t know what you’re doing.