Summary

Chief Justice John Roberts defended the judiciary against “illegitimate” attacks undermining its independence in his year-end report, citing violence, intimidation, disinformation, and defiance of rulings as critical threats.

He highlighted a rise in threats against judges, referencing protests following the overturning of Roe v. Wade and scrutiny over alleged ethics lapses, particularly involving Justice Clarence Thomas.

Roberts criticized political rhetoric questioning judicial impartiality and social media disinformation.

He also warned against political calls to ignore court decisions, emphasizing the need to uphold judicial authority amid ongoing controversies over recent rulings.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Roberts also cited disinformation, exacerbated by social media and in some cases hostile foreign governments, as a problem, as it can “undermine confidence in the court system.”

    No John, the erosion of confidence is your own courts doing. You refuse to hold yourself to ethical standards every other branch of government does.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You refuse to hold yourself to ethical standards every other branch of government does.

      Which branch is that?

      Legislative branch uses their power to increase their wealth. Probably why they won’t pass a bill banning stocks.

      Executive branch, well I guess we’ll see how far down the ethical road that goes, again…

  • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    The legacy of the Roberts court will its spiral into institutionalized corruption. For a man who claims to hold the legitimacy of the court to be paramount, his resistance to any sort of oversight of the court’s ethical standards will be how he is remembered. You can’t restore faith in institutions by grandstanding against your accusers in a fruitless effort to deflect the valid criticisms of your colleagues.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Since they have given the president the power to do anything if it is an official act I guess they will taste the bite of that decision soon.

  • WatDabney
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is one of the most disturbing and discouraging things about our current era.

    Clearly, the solution to the problem of people distrusting institutions because the officials in them are corrupt is to eliminate the corruption.

    But this is far from the first time recently that I’ve seen an official express the idea that the problem is not that they in fact are corrupt, but that people point out their corruption - as if we’re supposed to merely accept their corruption and grant them respect anyway, and somehow we’re to blame for the problem because we won’t do that.

    It’s astonishingly amoral. They’re not merely, as is all too common amongst the ruling class, acting as if they’re above the law, but overtly stating that they are, and faulting us for daring to treat them otherwise.

  • P_P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    SCOTUS is utterly corrupt and illegitimate.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    “How dare you make all of these criticisms about us, questioning our impartiality and suggesting we’re corrupt! Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to get on Justice Thomas’ free luxury RV and drive down to Harlan Crow’s mansion for a much-needed vacation.”

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      On my way to collect my after-ruling-gratuity from the person who I ruled in favor of which is definitely not a bribe and is totally legal.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    7 days ago

    Other people have already put it better, so I’m going to put it plainly.

    suggesting political bias in the judge’s adverse rulings without a credible basis

    Fuck. You. We know how disingenuous this is, and fuck you.

  • Zaktor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 days ago

    So we need more political calls to ignore court decisions, to degrade judicial authority from an illegitimate and corrupt institution.

    John Roberts is scared of his power being questioned and has been for a long time. The conservative “judicial” movement has put a lot of effort into acquiring the power to rule as politicians in black robes and doesn’t want anyone to take that away. That fear occasionally comes out in him giving token but ineffectual resistance to the bad decisions of his conservative teammates, but more often comes out as him criticizing anyone that would dare question why they should be listened to. Never does it involve actual efforts to bolster the court’s legitimacy and curb its blatant corruption.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I have no respect for five of them anymore and wish I had superpowers to fix what they have done.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t even know why we listen to them. They reversed a previous decesion by the supreme court when the overturned Roe. So what they are saying is SCOTUS can be wrong. Why do they even exist then.

    • toast@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 days ago

      We don’t need someone with superpowers. We just need a man of focus, commitment, and sheer will. Luigi, help us!