• 8 Posts
  • 959 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • Paris and Marie-Louise, who both study mental health nursing at the University of Salford, said they felt that being respectful of others’ opinions is key.

    Paris said she thought it was important to be able to “express your emotions and feelings without being disrespectful”, and allow others to do so too.

    The problem is that, not coincidentally in our current age, the speech we’re expected to respect - all of the examples they gave - are conservative views on race, gender and the like, all of which are pretty much explicitly advocacy for disrespect for some subset of humanity. So the call for mutual respect has already been violated simply by the expression of those views. The exact point of them is that this or that group of people should NOT be accorded respect.

    So the whole thing is self-defeating.

    Quite simply - if their calls to deny respect and/or rights to some group of people must be treated as legitimate, then our calls to deny respect and/or rights to them must also be treated as legitimate. And if our calls to deny them respect and/or rights are to be disallowed, then their calls to deny others respect and/or rights must also be disallowed.





  • This illustrates one of the many oddities about Trump.

    With any other president, we had policy debates and stated goals and decisions made and implemented.

    With Trump, we just have this string of essentially arbitrary threats, promises and rhetoric, and alongside that is a string of essentially arbitrary policies arbitrarily enacted and rescinded and followed and ignored, and there’s no necessary correlations between any of it.

    It’s another of the things that I think Trump does simply because he’s a delusional toxic narcissist, a genuinely stupid person, and emotionally a toddler, and another of the things that the would-be autocrats - the billionaires and the CEOs and the religious right and the Republicans and the rest of the greedy and power-hungry scum - take advantage of him doing.






  • With any luck, it will kill google.

    I don’t see how they can even pretend that it will do anything other than steal website traffic, since the exact point is to provide you with the information you would have gotten if you had gone to the website, leaving no reason to actually go to the website.

    So painfully obviously, Google intends to steal the websites’ content in order to steal the websites’ traffic.

    Which would seem to me to be grounds for class action lawsuits on behalf of the entire internet, which, if judged fairly, should bankrupt even that foul beast of a corporation.

    And ironically enough, that would almost certainly “rejuvenate the internet.” As a matter of fact, I can’t think of a single thing that would do more to “rejuvenate the internet” than killing Google.


  • In the interest of clarity, I don’t think that Johnson quite qualifies as a hypocrite, since a hypocrite has to have something at least resembling principles, and Johnson appears to have nothing of the sort.

    He appears to be an essentially complete, full-time toady, ready and willing and even eager to mouth whatever he thinks will please whoever he’s desperate to please at the moment. I don’t think he’s ever had a thought or opinion of his own in his entire life.

    Not that that’s any better or anything - just an observation.