• UID_Zero@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t it both shape and material? The refractive index of the material is important in determining how much the light bends at the interface.

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, but a clear crystal is a clear crystal.

      If you want to split light you can do what regardless of refractive index (as long as it isn’t zero), you’d just need to cut different angles and/or project the light onto a surface that’s closer/farther to get the same effect using a different material.

      • UID_Zero@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, but a clear crystal is a clear crystal.

        No, different materials have different refractive indices, even if they’re both “clear crystals.” Maybe the examples given are very close in refractive index, but they still differ, therefore split light differently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_refractive_indices

        I’m not saying it’s the entire difference, but it certainly comes into play. It could be that the more “explosive” light example is cut identically, but held slightly askew versus the others.

        Point is, it’s not just the cut that impacts the result.

        • MentalEdge
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s literally my point.

          I’m saying you can’t tell the difference between two materials unless they are cut the same.

          If they are cut differently to achieve the results you are seeing, you can’t tell whether the difference is because of the cut, or because of the material.