• Tehhund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I assume this was a grift — they “found” some bodies and declared them Arthur and Guinevere, and suddenly the site became a pilgrimage destination and lots of money started flowing in from the pilgrims.

    • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Says right there: they dug to find them. Actually finding them might have better chances elsewhere, on account of the bodies being elsewhere, but the light was better here and they didn’t have to walk that far.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    In a thousand years (if we last that long) they’ll have similar signs in Jerusalem and Rome.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Arthur probably didn’t exist. Guinevere certainly didn’t. Even if they did, there’s no reason to assume any particular location would be the location of their tombs.

      Plus, according to the legend, Arthur’s supposed to be alive and in the mystical island of Avalon, waiting until he is needed to return and become king again. These guys needed to look up their Geoffrey of Monmouth.

      Basically, it would be like digging to find the tomb of Uncle Sam and his wife.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Or they had tombs made for them and they remained empty because Arthur is alive on the mystical island of Avalon

        Yaknow, pharaoh pyramid rules - they built those suckers when the dude was still alive. But one dude just didn’t have to use his “pyramid” cause he floating on an island.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        Basically, it would be like digging to find the tomb of Uncle Sam and his wife.

        I just had the most amazing idea for a post-apocalyptic roleplay campaign.

        • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          There is no Once and Future King of England

          So far!

          … though I expect if there is one, it’s that shitty hologram/AI technology hybrid

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Fun fact, he was actually right in the original version — there hasn’t been a queen of England since 1707, when the kingdoms of England and Scotland were replaced with one kingdom of Great Britain

            • Skua@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              There was no title “king of England” or “queen of England” as of that date, in the same way that there is no king of Sheffield. There’s a king whose kingdom includes Sheffield, yes, but it’s not the kingdom of Sheffield

      • pimento64
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Arthur is alive and hanging out just north of Ardougne