• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    TL;DR from article:

    Under the 1997 NATO-Russia Framework Agreement, NATO has pledged not to permanently deploy significant forces in central and eastern Europe […] However, Russia has committed to refrain from aggression against its neighbours and is not complying […] As a result […] the Alliance is no longer bound by restrictions on the expansion of forces in its eastern flank.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Huh, it took Russia just a little over a decade to break that agreement by invading Georgia. Looks like NATO has had plentiful justification for the past 14 years to declare Russia in breach of the agreement.

      • guojing@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sounds like you cant wait for nuclear war. Rest assured that your country will be the main target for Russia.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Anybody with a couple of brain cells to bang together understands that it doesn’t matter who starts the nuclear war. Only an absolute idiot would cheer on conditions that make a nuclear war increasingly more likely.