• dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          75
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Remember when Clinton lost the election because the FBI didn’t find anything on her assistant’s laptop?

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            82
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean she could have spent a weekend in Michigan. That was an unforced error.

            She could have addressed her relationship with Goldman Sachs, and all the other banks that fucked over the entirety of the American people during the housing crisis that she earned millions upon millions giving “speeches” to.

            She could have made an olive branch to the progressive caucus.

            She could have not said “Sit down and shut up” to BLM activists.

            There are a lot of things she could have done.

            • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              32
              ·
              7 months ago

              Or, like, hear me out, the Democrats could have not nominated her and nominated someone who isn’t strongly disliked by both sides.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                18
                ·
                7 months ago

                I think she would’ve won regardless of everything else, but it would’ve been closer. Really the mistake from the primaries is that she didn’t really try to incorporate any of Bernie’s ideas into her platform, or even work with him at all. She treated him as an opponent and obstacle, not as a rival and peer.

                This is where Biden was successful however – he didn’t dismiss Bernie nor his platform ideas. He did incorporate some into presidency, most obviously the climate change policies and student debt forgiveness where possible.

                And where I sincerely believe this difference came down to – Biden was friendly to Bernie in the Senate and made an effort to be friendly colleagues, if not work friends. Clinton didn’t. It shows the power of cooperation allying together with progressives, instead of allying together with “moderate” Republicans.

                • dudinax@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Maybe, but it happened right before the election. I observed noticeable shift in attitude. That’s not good evidence, I know, but Clinton’s polls which had been steady, took a 3% dip at the time and stayed down through election day.

                  People talked about the polls being off compared to the election, but the election matched the post-Comey polls pretty well. It’s only the polls that mixed pre-Comey data that were too high for Clinton.

                  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    If you are interested in doing a more detailed analysis of this, I can supply you with some boiler plate code. 538 has pretty detailed polling data that’s free to download. I’m going to be getting into it later in June for my monthly polling update.

                    I was considering calculating Trumps polling error differential from 2016 and seeing how it changed to 2020. I did a map of his differential polling error for 2020 for my update two weeks ago.

                    I’m also considering of taking the differential polling result for just swing states, applying it to current polling, and mapping out a series of ‘pathways’ to 270 for each candidate, highlighting where the pressure points are.

                    I think a trying to model the impact of a single news story could be pretty interesting.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              There were a lot of factors at play in 2016, and the margin was tiny. She had a lot of factors under her control that could’ve led to victory.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Voters decided against her for mishandling classified documents, right? So these same voters, who think things through with consistency and integrity, will decide against someone who stole boxes of documents and got CIA agents killed selling state secrets to Russia, right?

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Trying to run for president while having two X chromosomes was a massive error on her part as well.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Everyone talks about his base as an unmoving monolith. But to get elected, he needs more than his base. He needs the fence sitters. Many of these people may be very ill informed about all the corruption in his original administration and his business dealings. This result will make a big difference to them because it’s simple to understand. He’s a convicted felon.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m making a called shot of a drop into the 40’s for July’s polling.

        He wont’ drop below 25%, ever. That’s his core. They may never support another candidate again.

        However, dropping to high 30’s low 40’s only puts Trump back to par with Biden. Hardly a W, but at lease Biden would be back in the running.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean it in a “There are still people who think gamestop is going to be a billion dollar stock” manner.

            See: https://lemmy.world/c/gamestopstock

            Cult/ Cargo cult level “They will never support another candidate again” is what I mean. They’ll write him in. They’ll have wild conspiracy theories. Not need to push. It will happen it on its own.

            I would guess its around 25-30% of Republican voters. Its the conspiracy theory mind-set cutting backwards against those that seed it. There is no undoing this.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        I suspect some people will mental gymnastics themselves into thinking this isn’t a serious crime, and stipulating an abstract ‘serious crime’ yields more extreme results than we’ll see as a result of this verdict.

        But a few percentage point swing in a few key states is enough to ensure a Biden victory, so it may be enough.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The fact of the matter is for a lot of white Americans it’s either support the republican nominee or those scary minorities will take over. To them, a white criminal is preferable to what they see as guliable saps at best or race traitors at worst.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The end of the article after discussing the failure of the impeachment of Clinton to actually change polls despite a difference in the hypothetical poll question before it occurred:

        “It’s possible for people to say a conviction would change their minds, but when/if [a conviction] happens, it’s possible (even likely) that it won’t matter at all."

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think “all 34 counts” is more meaningful than 33 out 34 or anything less.

      Any truly room temperature IQ folks out there can maybe see the light. Maybe.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Or they see it as “See? The courts are obviously corrupted. Not even one count was innocent? There’s no way he committed THAT much crime.”

    • nbailey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Anecdotal… we drove through rural Ohio a few weeks ago. In several hours of travel we only saw ONE trump sign. The same place in 2016 or 2020 would have been full of them. Regardless of the impact of this, the enthusiasm is dead. There might be “maga guys” on Twitter but they’re largely disengaged in real life.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you sneak into their safe spaces online you can definitely tell they are unmotivated compared to 4-8 years ago.

        They liked Trump because he bullied others publicly. They don’t want to side with the guy currently getting bullied, goes against their survival instinct.

      • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        All the people in my development that had them up still have the signs from 2020 going strong… It’s still pretty split from talking with neighbors. One person near me is in business selling heavy equipment and they’re looking forward to trump because they feel they sell more equipment when republicans are in office. I guess that’s a viewpoint… For sure.

        • Zaktor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Wait… But Biden passed a massive infrastructure law. There’s a lot of people who could feel like he didn’t really do anything to improve their economic outlook, but a guy who sells heavy equipment shouldn’t be one of them.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      My gut feeling is there’s nothing in this world that will sway his core supporters. Those rabid mouth-breathing dumbass kool-aid drinking dipshits would disown their own children if they thought one of them voted for a democrat.

      However, I think it could sway a lot of swing voters away from Trump. In American elections for POTUS, swing voters are extremely important.

      Unfortunately, Biden is fucking up so bad on foreign policy (Gaza) that will lose Biden a lot of swing voters, too. Still anybody’s race is my guess.

      This is just all my gut. It’s hard to trust polls anymore.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Anyone who gives a shit about Gaza probably should try to ensure the country doesn’t elect a Muslim Ban guy who wants to accelerate the genocide and deport anyone protesting it.

      • suction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Fuck off to Nick Fuentes then.

        FYI: Those leftists are right wing trolls under a false flag, exactly like those “Biden takes 100% blame for Israel’s every action” guys. They come from /pol and Telegram.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      This matters to intelligent, educated, and critically-thinking people. So, no, it doesn’t matter to his sycophants.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Doubt it, but I don’t care. They are basically a cult at this point, no rational thought.

      This matters to everyone else. And it could keep him from being president again.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      It emboldens his supporters because they believe the “deep state”, “witch hunt”, “Democrats paid off the jury” etc according to social media now.

      I could see Biden dropping out of the debate also saying “I don’t debate felons”.

      • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 months ago

        I doubt Biden would use this as an excuse to drop out of the debate. His campaign thinks the debate will help him more than Trump, and they’re probably right. Outside of his diehard supporters and people keeping up with politics, most voters haven’t heard Trump speak at length since the end of his presidency. The debate is an opportunity to remind them how fucking weird he is.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe his core supporters, but past elections have shown that he can’t win the popular vote. He is dependent on swing states where there are more people on the fence, and this might be enough.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think a lot of his supporters are mostly burnt out on him. Even the hardliners are really just in this for the Wrestlemania storyline quality and this guy isn’t entertaining anymore, he just has legal bullshit around him, he says the same catchphrases all the time, he’s looking older and more haggard than we’ve ever seen, and conservatives are super fixated on superficial appearances.

      I don’t think we’re “safe” by any means, but I think a lot of people are going to fall off and it might make a large difference.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wish you were right. I live in Trumpistan and this will only make people like him more. The only way we can stop this madness is actually have him in an actual jail. Even then I’m not so sure.

        • suction@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          They can only vote once. At least until Trump wins because from then on we’ll have elections Russia-style.

    • BurningnnTree@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think this will only strengthen his core supporters because they’ll view him as a martyr. It might push away some people on the fence. But I think the martyrdom angle and the increased media spotlight could pull some people back in. Personally I think it probably won’t make a difference overall. All publicity is good publicity.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nope, it’s just going to be more proof that he’s the guy to take on the ‘deep state’ and so on in their minds.

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      It emboldens them because he already painted himself the victim, the outsider. He literally called it a witch hunt.