• RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a software dev who has lost weeks of his life dealing with timezones, leap days, daylight savings time, date math and other associated nonsense I fully support this being the way the world is. I don’t want to go through the transition to get there though

    • lugal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Bad news: this has nothing to do with timezones, leap days nor daylight saving time. Honestly, leap days would be worse because they wouldn’t be part of the 7 day week

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s accounted for just like any other leap year, add it to the end of a month as a universal holiday. Most calendar models make it July 29. It’s also worth noting that this is actually 364 days, and a single day at the end of the year is a universal holiday.

        Edit: I think leap years should be at the end of the year too for simplicity.

        • Flipper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          That would just be new year. I’ve already have a list ready for how to name all the months, so we don’t fuck it up like September being the 9. Month again.

        • lugal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Which breaks “day of week = day modulo 7” if every month starts on Monday and not every month has the same number of days

          • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            In this scheme, new years day and leap days are not any day of the week or part of any month. They exist outside of the regular calendar as obvious and explicit resets to the remainder problem.

            • lugal
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              My point exactly. So the programmer who commented above me is wrong in saying it makes it easier for them

              • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                No, still easier. They are still part of the year, so you can just count them, and the logic is still easier than the mess we currently have. If you really feel the need to you can call new years day the zeroth day in the zeroth month, the day of the week is Holiday, and periodically the zeroth month has one extra Holiday.

                • lugal
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Computers store the date as “days after January 1st 1970”. So you have a huge number, divide it with 7 and get the day of the week. If there are days that don’t belong to any week, you have to calculate January 1st of that year and substrate it in addition to the steps above. I don’t say it’s not manageable, but it’s not easier

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Look, short of changing Earth’s orbit, something’s not gonna line up no matter what you do. Extra-weekly days are as good a compromise as any in my book.

            • lugal
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              There is also a technological solution, I knew it

            • lugal
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              My point exactly. So the programmer who commented above me is wrong in saying it makes it easier for them

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just make them holidays, everyone works too much anyway, and it’s just getting worse for no reason.

        • lugal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          … which fucks with the way the day of the week is calculated by computers as I already explained others

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Developers are the only people against DST changes, just because of how complex it will get. Dear God cities are removing DST! Cities! It means I need to know if you are in or out of a city to know if you need to be shown daylight or standard time!

      Just please do it nationally yes or no

        • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s essentially what I did in my recent UI that I made for someone.

          • You want to insert date time
          • Select method: UTC, Time Zone, offset from GMT
          • Enter time
          • I convert it to UTC and send to backend
        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That… still requires knowing which time zone to display. It doesn’t remove the requirement at all.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              and who implements localtime? You realize these functions call down to the system, and the system is very much ALSO written and maintained by coders…

              The point is SOMEONE actually does have to implement it and maintain it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Dear God cities are removing DST! Cities! It means I need to know if you are in or out of a city to know if you need to be shown daylight or standard time!

        That’s why it’s lucky that identifiers in the tz database are already things like America/New_York instead of “eastern time.”

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Newfoundland has only just over 500k population and has a nice GMT-2:30 time zone. That’s an extra half hour difference. Many cities are larger so I can see them wanting better time for themselves.

    • ben_dover@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      thank you for your service, i usually resort to libraries doing the heavy lifting but even then it’s tough and prone to error

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    7 months ago

    A lunar day is 27.3 days and a solar cycle is 29 and change. So we’d be just off the lunar cycles. Like when you’re sitting waiting for a turn lane signal to change and the person in front of you has a blinker that’s just a tiny bit slower than yours.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    France tried such calendar in 1789 and 1871. We lost it when Jules Ferry executed all the communalists in Paris. Some people in France still use those calendars to show their support to revolutionary ideas

  • Silverchase@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    7 months ago

    We should divide the year into four suits — one for each season. Each suit is thirteen weeks long, numbered ace to king. Sometimes we have a Joker day.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah yes, the Balatro calendar. I play a King of Diamonds, which triples the number of days in June and removes October.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    But how would the corporate world divide the 13 month year into quarters? Don’t you know what that’ll do to the bottom line?! Think of the poor shareholders! /s

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The solution to that is having 12 months of 4 weeks each, and one week of solstice every 3 months. One quarter then is 13 weeks in total. That makes it so each quarter perfectly matches a season and keeps it all in sync with solar time. In the ideal case you also match the school holidays to the solstice, and the winter solstice includes new year’s day and leap day, making it just a bit longer for Christmas holidays.

      Yes, I’ve given this a bit too much thought.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Split it to 3 months as is now, then the remainder is 28 days. 28 is divisible by 4 to leave 7.

      Q1 ends 1 week into April, Q2 ends 2 weeks into June, etc.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 months ago

      I actually had this happen once. My mental health actually improved, but it was untenable for my job and social life unfortunately. It was kinda nice for a couple months though.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, I noticed my rythem in absence of anything teathering it to the socially acceptable world is about 28 hours. Weird that I am not alone in this apparently.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            i’m pretty confident it’s an evolutionary adaption to ensure there are people in the tribe that are wide awake when others are sleeping, to keep an eye on things.

            same thing with neurodivergence, sexualities, and left-handedness; it’s all stuff that’s been boosting our survival as a species when a portion of the population has those differences.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Mine settled on 36 hour days and it was fantastic. Plenty of time to work, plenty of time to play, and plenty to sleep, every day. … then I got a 9-5 job and my life became hell again.

            • Adalast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sometimes I really hate the modern world. Especially working remotely doing what could be asynchronous work with colleagues, why the hell can’t we just sleep whenever we want, as long as the work gets done.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      What the flying fuck. I literally did that exact thing in university to manage my at-the-time undiagnosed sleep disorder.

      I slept through like 30% of my classes, but it was the most rested I’d ever been in my life.

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    This reminds me of a fantasy series I like, where the world still has 365 day, but every month is 30 days long, and the remaining 5 days are separate holidays for the solstices, equinoxes, and new years.

    Also, when are we going to do 10hrs/day, 100 min/hr and 100s/min?

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t decimalize time, instead dozenalize our numbers! Twelve is such a better building block than ten. Pretty much all math becomes way easier using dozenal numbers instead of decimal ones.

          • Kaityy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 months ago

            Big Decimal has brainwashed the population into thinking that 5 is a good number instead of the terrible prime number that it is. It should be clumped in with 7 and 11 as Bad Numbers when you’re dealing with anything except for 10s.

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, but having 2, 3, 4, 6 as factors is way better than having only 2 and 5. We’d be giving up one factor to add three.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also, when are we going to do 10hrs/day, 100 min/hr and 100s/min?

      This is how you collectively give the entire scientific community a simultaneous aneurysm. The amount of work needed to convert measurements based on our current seconds/minutes/hours to your “metric” seconds/minutes/hours would be astronomical.

      Also, pretty much everyone already agrees on the current system of time, so why change it? It would just create another metric/imperial or F/C divide and cause conversion mistakes.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I like this better because if you have to do one holiday outside of the calendar then why not 5 and the equinoxes and solsctices divide it up perfectly. Then everything else is nice and even. I assume weeks were six days long as that is how I always thought of it. 5 six day weeks.

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    In preparation for the upcoming Bell Riots, WWIII, Eugenics Wars, First Contact, Battle of Wolf 359, and Dominion Wars, I say we stop beating around the bush and adopt the Bajoran 26 hour day.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can we do something about October being the 10th month of the year. It’s stupid and annoying.

      • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s a common misconception. For the Romans, the year used to start with March and only have ten months. January and February weren’t even named, it was just the time between harvest and the new year. Several calendar changes followed over the centuries. Adding two months (January and February). Moving the new year to January, which made September-December no longer 7-10. Adding random one-off months to realign with the seasons. And a couple different tries at leap days, among other things.

        This gives a quick overview.

        Edit 2: To clarify, the above changes were all made by the Romans, they only started with a ten month calendar.

        Edit: The fifth and sixth months were originally named Quintilis and Sextilis before they were changed to July and August.

        • zaphod
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The Romans had twelve months and they even named January and February, it’s usually attributed to Numa Pompilius, second king of Rome sometime during his reign (715–672 BC) of the Roman Kingdom.

          • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            All covered in the link. The addition of January and February and later moving the new year from March to January is the reason Sept-Dec are no longer the seventh-tenth months. Not July and August, which were renamings, not additions.

            Edit: I suppose my first comment should have specified early Romans. The way I wrote it could be read as all those changes happening after the Romans.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        I suppose we could fix it by moving the start of the year to March 1st. Start of spring makes more sense for the new year anyway.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can thank Julius Augustus for that. He wanted the best months named after himself. Egomaniac.

  • bobbytables@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I hate the idea of metric time (for a lot of use cases metric is still awesome).

    12 and 60 can be easily divided by 2, 3, 4, 6. 60 also by 5 and 10. Even for 8 it’s still kind of easy.

    For 10 or 100 division is easy for 2, 5 and 10 and okay-ish for 4.

    The 12/60 (and 360 degrees of a circle) are such an elegant system!

      • bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        AFAIK the system goes back to the old Babylonians who had a base-60 system subdivided into 5 times 12. 5 times 12 could easily be counted using your thumb to count the 12 knuckles on the other fingers and the 5 fingers of the other hand.

        I mean, how amazing is counting like that! I only learned to count to 10 with my fingers. I love the base-10 for its simplicity but base-60, subbase-12 is the shit :D

        • Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Even easier and more comfortable - count the pads instead of the knuckles. You can count to 12 with one hand, or 144 with two

          • bobbytables@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You are right! English is not my first language and I thought I was talking about the pads. My bad! Yours is the best way!

    • SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      makes sense in a world without much fractions or the decimal system. You want to get the most divisors for your buck.

      • bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        IMHO especially in a setting like time where fractions are very common (like “half an hour”), being able to represent fractions with whole numbers is very convenient.

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thank you ! Last time I tried to explain this on Lemmy, I wrote my longest comment ever. I’m gonna use you much better explanation next time.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve actual been saying this for years for this exact reason. God forbid we not be able to divide a year into clean quarters.

    • BigBenis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Three months and one week still seems like a clean quarter to me.

      Alternatively, if we really want to stick to the three-month quarter then we could call the extra week of each quarter an off-week or save it all for the 13th month of the year since nothing really gets done during that time anyway.