A pro-science marxist who is labeled with Autism and ADHD. Psychiatry is a psuedoscientific tool of oppression mostly used by the bourgeoisie and we should oppose it!

Dealing with silent reflux.

  • Prolewiki (can’t access forgot password, no email)
  • 378 Posts
Joined vuosi sitten
Cake day: tammi 18, 2022


> Holterman immediately rushed to see his general practitioner, who prescribed him a round of antibiotics. Unfortunately, the drugs had no effect, and the personal assistant’s condition began to deteriorate further, with the bumps lingering for several weeks. Better question: Why did the doctor jump immediately to antibiotics instead of checking the pathogen? U.S doctors suck ass…

[Esperanto] Kial iĉo ne bezonata: [Why iĉ (a gender reform) is not needed]
transafiŝita el: https://lemmy.ml/post/837623 > Simple: > > * Patr'o: ĝeneralseksa patro. > * Patr'in'o: ina patro. > * __Vir'patr'o:__ vira patro. > * __Vir'patr'in'o:__ interseksa patro > > Instru'ist' enhavis viran sencon; sed nun tio enhavas ĝeneralseksan sencon. Simply: * Patr'o: for parent * Patr'in'o: for female parent * __Vir'patr'o:__ for male parent * __Vir'patr'in'o:__ for intersex parent Instru'ist' used to have a male sense; but now it has a unsexed sense.

Kial iĉo ne bezonata:
Simple: * Patr'o: ĝeneralseksa patro. * Patr'in'o: ina patro. * __Vir'patr'o:__ vira patro. * __Vir'patr'in'o:__ interseksa patro Instruist' havis viran sencon; sed nun tio havas ĝeneralseksan sencon.

[Post] My husband refuses to learn how to cook so he made himself boiled eggs and naan bread for dinner. - r/mildlyinfuriating
The fuck is OP's problem? He cooked for *himself,* not *you;* and he didnt pester you to cook. Also, naan bread requires cooking… so either he cooked it or ordered it. Either way, who cares?

[Neveraj diroj pri Esperanto]
Mi nesuprizis ke malkontraŭkoloniistajn burĝarojn disdiras tiajn malverojn pri Esperanto. Ankaŭ, esperanto fondata sur *kunigeblaj vorteroj.* esperanto ne fondita sur afiskoj.

toEsperantoMi havas demandon por cxiuj riistoj:
17 päivää

sed «menciita persono» povas signifi personon de nedefinan sekson; li kaj ŝi nur referas du seksojn. «Oni» povas esti frutempan solvon.

«Oni» ankaŭ povas signifi signifon («nedefina sekso») kaj tio vorto povas signifi por «ri».

Alie, «ĝi» povas signifi la vorton «ri» ĉar «ĝi» estas pronomon por animecan ion; sed «ĝi» povas ligi kun neanimecon per senco de angla vorto “it”. (fek anglcentrismo!)

«io» estus malbonigan vorton se uzita por nedefina sekso.

Mi ne volas estiĝi esperantidiston.

About that adjective-subjective agreement thing, you were right, that is indeed in the fundamento de esperanto. So, yeah it was incorrect to speak like that.

(I’m unable to edit that post sadly…)

Mi havas demandon por cxiuj riistoj:
Kial ne uzu vorton "oni"?

Physicians can persecute anyone they want through psychiatry.

Procapitalist physicians have become police collaborators.

Ever notice how there’s a lot of Russophobia and racism against Russians in Counter-Strike games?
Before the ukraine war, I noticed that a bunch of insults in that game were targetting Russians like saying SUKA BLYAT in a mocking tone. Some of The U.S fan base generalize(d) russians as if they're like this.

I got curious about what the Bolsheviks would have done so I searched.

Interestingly enough, the Bolsheviks seemed to have went for no fixed or constant age of consent; instead, they used the presence of puberty as a primary factor for the age of consent. Courts would use medical testing to determine if a person was going through puberty.

In the 1922 RSFSR Criminal code of article 166 and 167:[1]

4. Преступления в области половых отношений

  1. Половое сношение с лицами, не достигшими половой зрелости, карается - лишением свободы на срок не ниже трех лет со строгой изоляцией.

  2. Половое сношение с лицами, не достигшими половой зрелости, сопряженное с растлением, или удовлетворение половой страсти в извращенных формах, карается

4. Sexual offences

  1. Sexual intercourse with persons who have not reached puberty is punishable - by deprivation of liberty for a term not less than three years with strict isolation.

  2. Sexual intercourse with persons who have not reached puberty зрелос, involving corruption, or the satisfaction of sexual passion in perverted forms, is punishable - by deprivation of liberty for a term not less than five years.

Same for the 1926 RSFSR Criminal code:[2]

  1. Sexual intercourse with persons who have not reached puberty, involving corruption or satisfaction of sexual passion in perverted forms, - imprisonment for a term of up to eight years.

Sexual intercourse with persons who have not reached puberty, committed without the specified aggravating signs, - imprisonment for a term of up to three years.

  1. Debauchery of minors or minors committed by means of debauched acts against them, - imprisonment for a term of up to five years.

  2. Sexual intercourse involving physical violence, threats, intimidation or using the victim’s helpless state by deception (rape) - […]

  3. Entering into marriage with a person who has not reached the age of marriage, - imprisonment for a term of up to two years. Entering into a marriage with a person who has not reached puberty , or forcing him to enter into such a marriage - the measures provided for in Article 151 of this Code .

So, for example,

  • If there was a 16 year old teenager and they had not gone through puberty, they would technically be considered a minor and thus lack age of consent.
  • If a 15 year old teenager had initiated puberty and there was no coercion, they would have consent.

What I wonder is what would happen to people older than 18 who never got puberty, like some people with Kallmann Syndrome. Would they still be considered minors then?

Of course this is for the RSFSR; I don’t know what the other soviet republics did.

Surviving socialist states

The current surviving socialist states seem to have stuck to the more common fixed age of consent concept:

Age in years:

  • China - 14
  • Laos - 15
  • DPRK - 15 (from 0 years, I think)
  • Cuba - 16
  • Vietnam - 18

  1. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901757375 (russian, use translator) ↩︎

  2. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901757374 (russian, use translator) ↩︎

Ohh. I should have just meant and said perform sex. I treated the two like they’re the same. Sorry.

I thought that was implied through the general term damage, that’s why I used the general term damage and not just physical. Sorry if it came off that way.

(Technically, all damage (physical, emotion, neurological, etc.) is physical as it affects the human body, but that shouldn’t and hopefully doesn’t downplay their effects and importance of recognition.)

Because someone using their power dynamic to coerce a minor into sex isn’t sexual abuse to some people, while it is to me, for example.

That is sexual abuse to me.

To attempt answering your question, I dont think its solely a matter of sexual development of the body. Mental development is much more important, especially the ability to manage human relationships and set boundaries.

I didnt think about brain development until now. Yes, that is important.

Age of consent is also not simply a binary question of yes or no

Yes. through dialectical materialism, sexual coercion can’t be simplified into merely use of physical force; there is also economic coercion (through capital), and they all influence consent.

One approach I know about is that relationships between young teenagers are only legal up to an age difference of 2 years or so, not with adults.


It also makes sense that parents should be able to decide if their child can enter in a relationship with a specific person, after all they know their child best.

It’s also said that the child knows best; and I think that children should learn what makes for a good relationship (no damage of all types).

I have issues with rape and abuse; of course I want to be and am against that.

Yeah, maybe I should have worded that more clearly to say “sexual abuse” is still bad.

But you’re probably gonna get banhammered anyway. Thanks to horde of libertarians in the internet every discussion about those things is automatically considered bad faith pedo bait everywhere except liberast pits.

Yep. They suck. 😒

That’s why internet marxist stance is “do not talk about it”. From what i see in the real life marxist theoreticians also basically just accepted current societal norm without any comments.

OK, thanks.

Never said prepubescent sex was good. It’s still bad because it damages the child.

You’re assuming age of consent is about puberty, reproduction, but age of consent is about being intellectually capable of understanding and having responsibility for actions, which isn’t something you can measure in a physical sense.

  1. Intellectual knowledge in a person would have to be physical though, otherwise it wouldn’t affect the brain (and they wouldn’t learn anything).
  2. Simple solution then: Initiate sex education at all school levels and multiple times.

“the conclusion of sexual development allows a person to have sex without sustaining damage” this is baseless and incorrect

How is it baseless and incorrect? Without puberty, humans would never become able to sexually reproduce safely and also develop into adults.

fucking creepy as shit, tbh

What’s creepy about saying that ending puberty allows a person (or adult in that case) to perform sex safely (without sustaining damage)?

What is the marxist conception of the age-of-(sexual)-consent discussion?
I have noticed that when I looked at some discussions on age-of-consent that the arguments are often built on metaphysics. (For example, the idea that sexual development (or puberty) has definite, exact stages; and start or end dates.) However, the dialectical materialist conception *opposes* metaphysics; so this would mean that if the age-of-consent is built on metaphysics; then it will not correspond to material reality. This would include the start and end of sexual development in people; some people self-initate or end puberty much earlier (like at 8 or 9 years age) than what is traditionally expected (12 to 13 years age); and the rate of puberty onset has changed with the material conditions^[[J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Nov; 60(11): 910–911. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049379 PMCID: PMC2465479 PMID: 17053275](https://sci-hub.se/10.1136/jech.2006.049379)] (as dialectical materialism predicts). So, if a person ends puberty (sexual development) much earlier than the age-of-consent and has gotten clear sex education; then should they still be not allowed to have sex until that age? What about adults having late puberty? What about people who never went through puberty, like some people with [Kallmann Syndrome](https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/kallmann-syndrome/)? --- Since the conclusion of sexual development allows a person to have sex without sustaining damage, with ***good and proper*** sex education (as is education that doesn't lead to rape), that would mean the person would be able to safely have sex, even if they have late puberty or end puberty earlier than expected. This is the opinion I've developed from my rethinking on this topic.

transafiŝita el: https://lemmy.ml/post/759598 > Kamarado Hó Ĉi Minh! > > Ĉu ajn homo aŭ ajn reto havas ĉin libron? -- Comrade Ho Chi Minh (is based AF)! Does anyone or any site have this book?

Kamarado Hó Ĉi Minh! Ĉu ajn homo aŭ ajn reto havas ĉin libron?

¿Kioj Vortnomoj por Hegelaj Dialektikoj kaj Marksaj Dialektikoj?
Mi ŝatas vorton «dialektikismo» anstataŭ «dialektikoj» aŭ anglan «dialectics».

Out of the frame: disability and the body in the writings of Karl Marx
Also, Marx himself became disabled and chronically ill in his adult life.^[[The nature and consequence of Karl Marx's skin disease](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08282.x)]^[[Was Marx’s Probable Enemy Hidradenitis Suppurativa?](http://ojcpcd.com/dallo-c-h/was-marxs-probable-enemy-hidradenitis-suppurativa/)] You'd think more disability rights movements (other than the ones conducted by marxists) would be supporting him and other revolutionary marxists.


because people’s solutions are lead by individualized fears. /j

Kiel ni solvos la lingvon problemon #mardamemo #Esperanto
Koloniistoj: "¡ĈiUj lErNu AnGlAn!" Ankaŭ koloniistoj: *Kolerita kie pro nedenaskaj popoloj malpovas diri anglan (lingvon)*

Train explosion poisoning the air in Northeast Ohio - r/CrazyFuckingVideos
The cops tried to ***fucking cover it up!*** 🤣 Hmm, I wonder why people don't trust the authorities™ here. --- La kapitalisma policistaro ***provis kaŝi ĝin!*** 🤣

What would marxian view-bait (or clickbait) be like?
¿Markseca rigardkaptilo estus kion?

Also: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00186-y

and of course:

Article conclusion: take antidepressants if you’re told to and don’t worry about your gut microbiome, even though that’s probably what made you depressed in the first place. We only treat symptoms, not causes.

Why do seemingly many responses to fight videos have bigoted-rhetoric? (specifically on Reddit)
[This video](https://libreddit.spike.codes/r/FightsGoneWildpt2/comments/10w0kcf/equality_part_2_ft_suplex_city/) as an example has the "mEn'S rIgHtS!" sexist rhetoric of "equality". Also: * https://libreddit.spike.codes/r/fightporn/comments/vjytb8/somewhere_in_russia_a_fight_over_a_woman/ (Fatphobia) * https://libreddit.spike.codes/r/fightporn/comments/10e1r9l/kim_deserved_that_broken_nose/ ("mUh MeN's RiGhTs")

The U.S is the worst place to live as a disabled person. May as well think about going to Cuba or China instead of staying here.

Anticommunist ranting about psychiatric abuse in China.
> In early July, a Chinese woman named Dong Yaoqiong streamed a video of herself throwing ink at a portrait of China’s leader, Xi Jinping. In the video, Dong explains that the gesture was intended to “say publicly that I oppose the tyranny of Xi Jinping’s dictatorship and the brain-control oppression imposed by the Chinese Communist Party.” A little over a month later, Dong suffered a different form of brain control. According to **Radio Free Asia,** she has been confined to a psychiatric hospital in her native Hunan. Oh dear, the CIA is at it again I see… Good on the Chinese state to oppress that piece of shit.

This is a small part of anglo colonialism by the anglo tech industry.

Let’s not forget, the U.S tech industry was originally developed only for English speakers and treated foreign speakers as an after thought.

  • Notice how many sites (like Reddit) demand an account identifier that only uses English letters and numbers.
  • How many tech infrastructural (like compilers and editors) programs (for example gcc, git, the linux kernel, and emacs) only have English documentation and allows only English use in identifiers and configuration.

How did I block myself? (and also need help to unblock myself lol)
I checked out the blocks page of settings, and I apparently blocked myself at some point. I of course can't fix it myself.

Unfortunately, the Non-GMO movement exists… I hate that shit so much.

Brazil had a president change?

I'm horrified at the idea of becoming disabled here.

An actual child taking orders at Culvers this evening
Good old child labor in the civilized™ west!

Emacs.ch - Emacs mastodon instance
Emacs.ch - Emacs mastodon instance

Esperanta longigoj:

  • URL - Unuforma rimedo loktrovonto.
  • http(s) - Superteksto transportisto protokolo (sekura). (STP(s))

Kiel devus ni kontraŭanglonta komputilsciencan vortarojn? [How will we deanglicize computer science dictionaries?]
Angllingvo dominas tutmonda komputilscienceon ĝis 1920s kaj nun. [English languages dominating global computer science from 1920s to now.] Mi vole pensas al uzu soveta ruslingvo aŭ ĉina komputilscienceaj vortoj. Socialisma rusio kaj ĉinio estas progresecajn ŝtatojn. [I am wantingly thinking to use the soviet russian language or chinese language computer science words. Socialist russia and china are progressive states.]

AmicesetoFuck Cars@lemmy.mlJesus christ
2kolme kuukautta

Cars are around the stadium too.

God I hate football…

toEsperantoEsperanto, a western language? [Not really]
kolme kuukautta

I don’t want to argue with you, your arguments are absurd,

Kiel? (Malakceptecan argumenton diris vi.)

and you make a lot of mistakes in Esperanto:

  • “slavikan lingvojn” -> “slavikaj lingvoj”
  • “radika vortaj” -> " radikaj vortaj"
  • “okcidenta lingvoj” -> “okcidentaj lingvoj”
  • “okcidenta landoj” -> “okcidentaj landoj”
  • “interlingvan komunikadojn” -> "interlingvajn komunikadojn
  • “devus ne sekvas” -> “devus ne sekvi” (not sure about this)

I didn’t see any document stating that subject-adjectival agreement was required.

“estas referas denaska nomoj”?

Mi ne vidis ĉin tiun.

“povas nomiĝas”?

That’s can (present) name (transitive, present).

“lingva demografio” -> “lingvan demografion”

Mi ne vidas ĉin tion. Mi ankoraŭ necesite pensu al uzi akuzativan afikson…#

kolme kuukautta

Western bourgeoisies’ goal of colonizing Russia.

Also, how is communism a disease? It doesn’t even exist yet.

toEsperantoEsperanto, a western language? [Not really]
kolme kuukautta

This article is stupid.


Esperanto is zonal germanic+romance+slavic constructed language. Just because there are ~1% elements in the language that differ from western languages does not make it less western language

Ĝi certe malsamas sur kvanta skalo, ne certe sur kvalita skalo.

  1. Kial vi pensas slavikan lingvojn estas okcidentoj?
  2. Kial vi penas ke centre 1%-a elementoj malsame al okcidentan lingvojn.
  • La fakto radika vortaj ŝanĝoj ne estas okcidentalingva aŭ angla trajto; ĉi tiu trajto trovita en Mandareno kaj Araba lingvo.
  • Landaj nomoj estas referas denaska nomoj, ne orientalistaj nomoj:
    • Kartvelo nomiĝas kartvel/ en Esperanto; okcidenta lingvoj nomi “Georgia” en Angla (Georgian), Nederlanda, Germana etc.
    • Barato nomiĝita barat/ en Esperanto anstataŭ okcidenta landoj nomas baraton “Indi”: Angla (India), Nederlanda (Indi), Germana (Indi), Dana (Indi).
  • Japano nune povas nomiĝas nipon/o.
  • Ne perfekte malbonŝanĉe… (Japan/, Ĉin/, UGK!)

ne, popoleca esperanta vorto por “not”, formis el Rusan lingvon (не).

My native language is Turkic and Esperanto seems to me unattractive and foreign,

Bono. Esperanto designis kreski interlingvan komunikadojn; ĝi devus ne sekvas unu lingva demografio.

toEsperantoEsperanto, a western language? [Not really]
kolme kuukautta

La artikolo montras Esperanton ne estas okcidento.

Those who criticize Esperanto for being too Western overlook two important aspects of the question. First, they neglect to proceed to a linguistic analysis of the language, which is the only way to discover how different it is, in depth, from what it seems to be at first sight: their judgment is purely superficial. Second, they ignore the fact that some language is necessary if people with different mother tongues have to communicate. In practice, on what language does one fall back when mutual comprehension is needed and Esperanto is not used? On English! Isn’t this one a Western language? As a matter of fact, it has many more Western features than Esperanto, and is much more difficult to learn and use for the large majority of the inhabitants of our planet. No language could put all peoples on an equal footing. But among all those that exist and are being used, Esperanto comes closest to that ideal. After 2000 hours of English (five hours a week for ten school years), the average Japanese and Chinese are incapable of using it in a really operational way. Their clumsiness, as well as their difficulty in producing the relevant sounds, tend to complicate communication or to make them ridiculous, a risk which is, unfairly, spared the native speaker of English, although he is the one who has made no effort towards mutual understanding. After 220 hours of Esperanto, as an average, Eastern Asians can really communicate in that language, a language which is a foreign language for everybody and in which the risk of sounding strange is thus equally distributed.