Big fan of commandline tools such as vim, htop etc. What is in your opinion must have tools?

  • ds12@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    fzf for quickly matching file names especially deep in the directory hierarchy

    ripgrep for quickly searching for text content within files

    dtrx for handling the right extractions of different archive types

  • Fubarberry@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kakoune (kak) has become my go to vim replacement. Keybinds are tweaked slightly to be more user friendly and more transparent about what it is you’re doing.

    I never mastered vim binding as well as I liked, but the more intuitive and better communicated binds for kak were easy to learn in comparison and I quickly swapped over.

  • Ramin Honary@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have mostly replaced all command line stuff with Emacs, but there are still a few CLI utilities that I continue to use, whether I am in the CLI directly or whether I am using Emacs:

    • tmux or screen (terminal multiplexing)
    • bash (shell scripting)
    • grep, sed (filtering, formatting)
    • ps, pgrep, pkill (process control)
    • ls, find, du (filesystem search)
    • ssh, nc, rsync, sshfs, sftp (remote access, file transfer)
    • tee, dd (pipe control)
    • less, emacs, diff, patch, pandoc (text editing)
    • man, apropos (manual)
    • tar, gzip, bzip2, xz (archiving)
    • hexdump, base64, basenc, sha256sum (data encoding, checksums)
    • wget, curl, (HTTP client)
    • dpkg, apt-get, guix (package management)
    • mpv (media player)
    • ldd, objdump, readelf (inspecting binary files)
    • zfs (maintaining my backup filesystem)
  • gfle@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • ranger and mc - both are file managers, and their approach is so different that I choose one of them I need at the moment depending on what do I want to do (mc for traditional file management, ranger for looking around the directory tree and peeking into files)
    • htop, tmux - classics
    • weechat, profanity - for my IM needs
    • ripgrep - for searching through files
    • magic-wormhole for file and ssh public key exchange
    • mosh for when the network conditions aren’t ideal
    • nmap to see if that machine I’ve connected into the network is up and what IP did it get
    • bat for quick looking into files
    • gdb, with mandatory gdb dashboard
    • nvim for serious text and code editing, micro for more casual editing
  • vortexal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They might have specific uses that most users might not need and there may be better alternatives but some of the ones I’ve been using are:

    CISO - A command line tool for making compressed ISO files that can be used in emulators and some video game consoles running custom firmware.

    RAR - The Linux version of WinRAR, which doesn’t have a UI like the Windows version does.

    Flatpak - Probably well known but in case a newer Linux user sees this, it’s used to download and install flatpaks from Flathub.

  • ForthEorlingas@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I basically live in nvim. Being able to configure my editor in an actual programming language makes it so much more useful to me than vim could ever be.

      • ForthEorlingas@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Vimscript is way more intuitive than Lua in a lot of ways. And as far as programming languages go, Lua has some strange design choices that I’m not the biggest fan of, either. However, it really does open up a lot of possibilities when your configuration is programmatic.