• worldwidewave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    366
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Israel has a right to self-defence, but it has to be done within international law … cutting water, cutting electricity, cutting food to a mass of civilian people is against international law,” said EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on Tuesday (10 October).

    He repeated the view more than once in his press briefing. “The Palestinian people are also suffering,” he added.

    An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. This cycle of violence and repression needs to stop.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the point. The game is to be the last man standing with at least partial vision.

    • Locrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a pretty clown face move to attach those that supply your water, electricity and fuel.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        By that logic, the other way this ends is the dissolution of israel.

        They cant seem to stop themselves from murdering and pillaging their neighbors, right? So they have to go. Right? Thats matching your logic just fine.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s another possibility.

        Lebanon gets involved. Then Iran. Then the US. Then Iraq. Then Afghanistan. Then Russia. On and on until it’s WW3

        But no one wants to talk about that

        • renlok@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the EU and the US have managed to avoid getting directly involved in Ukraine Vs Russia and starting WW3 that way, there is no way this conflict will start anything that big.

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody talks about it, because it’s not realistic. This will be treated as another proxy war, with countries providing aid, but not actively fighting.

          The US and Russia are already involved. Russia likely started this mess, and US is already sending munitions to its ally.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What’s unlikely about Hezbollah getting involved? Or Iran? Or the Taliban?

            It can easily inflame into a massive regional war, and there go oil prices. With oil prices go food prices. With both, inflation slips out of control. Now there’s fuel shortages and hunger everywhere, heightening tensions.

            This is a powder keg. Wake up

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes I’m sure we need to care about great power Afghanistan “getting involved” in Gaza. We should also be wary of Mongolia, and probably Lesotho as well.

          Russia/Iran/US/EU are all already “involved” in with Israel. US/EU/Israel want to culturally genocide palestine and Russia/Iran want to hurt the US/EU. This isn’t ww3, and if push comes to shove none of the major players are going to start ww3 over Israel or Palestine.

      • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        they really could have just left them alone. It would have been exactly the same result with the Palestinians blaming those in Palestine for their issues.

        instead they meddle and build illegal settlements.

      • grte@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        72
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn, 1948 was a thousand years ago? Time is weird, I guess.

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you want to just count recent history, jews started buying land and returning to Palestine in the late 1800s. They started flooding in after some anti-semitic pogroms in the early 20th century and things have been spicy since.

          • grte@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This isn’t a conflict that was going on in the Ottoman period. This is a recent conflict and this attempt to turn it into a thousands year old religious war is bullshit. This is a colonial project where the goal is to take land. Very material in nature. That project has been in place since 1948.

              • grte@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Quite the opposite. I feel the same as you, both sides should be allowed to stay. What’s done is done and ethnically cleansing the area is obviously a horrific crime that oughtn’t be advocated for in either direction. Where we differ is that I see the two state solution as setting the region up for the same conflict down the road. After decades of settlement the areas which would make up the Palestinian state would be non-contiguous swiss cheese. It would be an untenable situation.

                Instead, a singular, secular, egalitarian state with universal suffrage and human rights guaranteed for all would be a challenging path, but I think ultimately a more stable one. And a path which would leave room for healing in the future.

              • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Bulshit. The diaspora started in 63BC, under Roman rule. Everybody could live peacefully side by side in one country, save for the religious nutheads pushing their hatred rhetoric

              • TGHOST-V0@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you really saying that Holocaust happened because of the Palestinians.

                Jews and Muslims were literally brother before all this western bullshit, so come on.

                Unbelievable 🙁

              • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which country gets the Temple Mount?

                There’s a reason why every single non politician Palestinian who favors peace wants a single state. If material conditions persist what good will some embassies do Palestine?

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              1 year ago

              Debatable. The people who think it’s a millennia-long feud are counting from when the Romans threw the Israelites out of Israel according to the Bible. For them, protecting Israel at all costs is a religious thing, and their religion has existed for millennia, so 💁

              • grte@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                29
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Islam hadn’t even come about at that time, however, so people casting it as a religious war between Jews and Muslims come across as especially disingenuous if they try to frame it that way. Hell, the Romans hadn’t even Christianized at that time. Is it a war between Judaism and Paganism? C’mon.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You and I both know that, but the Bible - thumping loonies who support Israel’s corrupt government right or wrong don’t. They literally think that if the U.S. ever wavers or gives up support of the Israeli government in any way, it’ll bring on the end times and trigger the prophecies in the Book of Revelations.

                  🤔 I never used to put much stock into the argument that religion is dangerous, but seeing how it affects everyone else politically, I will have to concede that point. It is very dangerous to civil society. If that’s a authoritarian thing to say, it doesn’t really matter – the truth is inherently authoritarian in the minds of the weak.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The region of Israel was created in 1948 by stealing Palestinian land to give to white European Jews. It’s not a religious conflict, it’s European colonialism

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        There have actually been plenty of periods of peace and tolerance in the middle east over the millennia. When these feuds break out people go back and dig up ancient reasons to justify them, but the feuds themselves are new and are not contiguous with those ancient ones.

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ehhhhh…when everyone reporting on it and everyone involved all acknowledge these old reasons as the root of the issue, I’m inclined to believe them over some comment on Lemmy.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As I said:

            When these feuds break out people go back and dig up ancient reasons to justify them

            So they say now that “we’re doing this because a thousand years ago their ancestors did our ancestors dirty”, but there were periods in between then and now where it was water under the bridge and people got on with their lives.

            If you think that people in those regions have literally been killing each other every day for over a thousand years, how is anyone actually left at this point?

            • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just because there may be periods of peace doesn’t mean these deep rooted issues just no longer matter.

              • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So conflicts like this can never actually end? Any peace is an illusion, just a pause before the next turn of the wheel? I don’t have such a pessimistic view.

                There have been conflicts like this throughout history that really have permanently faded off back into the past, with the modern descendants living perfectly fine together and no longer concerned about those original causes of the conflict. If they end up with some new reason to fight in the future they may fight again, of course, and they may even dredge up those old conflicts as part of their propaganda. But it would be a new conflict, not the old one reborn. They’re not going to just up and start fighting again for no new reason.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can say that about literally every piece of land on the planet.

        So can you. You literally did, in a comment in this exact thread

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Exactly. We can say that about anywhere, and many people can claim Palestine as their ancestral home. It’s in the past and that’s over now. Sucks but my people went through it. Get every white and European off of my continent and ancestral lands and I’d be more sympathetic. P.s that’s what makes me laugh too about all this, North American kids bitching about Israel colonizing Palestine, meanwhile my native ass is sitting there wondering if they get the irony.

          Israel isn’t going away, the people who think the answer is getting rid of it are delusional.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lol, no, not quite. Nice try, but theres a difference between “every piece of land has bloodshed” and “a decade ago is technically the past, so you need to excuse all the war crimes we committed!”

            No one gives a shit about your native ass crying “they killed people before, why should we save their lives??” Your ancestral injustice does not justify modern injustice.

            Just admit youre racist and shuuut the fuuuck uuuup, no one wants your opinion

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                You literally said, in this thread, that youre native born who had your ancestors land taken from you and no one stopped that, so why should anyone help here?

                Thats racial, dude. You said that. Im not falling back on anything, Im pointing the fucked up things you said.

        • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Heard a lot of shit Iran’s supposed to be involved with in the region, but it’s the first time I hear them being accused of having engineered the Israel -Palestine conflict. How do you figure that? I would’ve understood accusing France for their involvement in sykes-picot, or even the Turks since the Ottomans administered the region in early 20th century. But Iran started supporting the Palestinians after the 1979 revolution, before that the Shah very much supported Israel. So I have a hard time seeing how they could be blamed for engineering the conflict.

        • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haven’t read a history book I take it, if you think the fight over Palestine is a new thing. I guess you’ve also never heard of the Crusades

    • Argonne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas can surrender and they’ll get water immediately. I don’t see why Israel has to give them anything while their soldiers get killed during the takeover

      • faltryka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel isn’t just denying Hamas water, they are denying Palestinians water. That includes children and infants and uninvolved innocents.

                • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re making vague statements that the children of Gaza should be evacuated, but that’s not a solution unless you can tell me where they would be evacuated to.

                  There are two and a half million people in the Gaza Strip. What place is going to accept two and a half million Palestinian refugees? Bear in mind that millions of Palestinians have already ended up as refugees throughout the region and that is already considered a huge problem. Nobody wants even more to deal with. So what country? Even if there were magical teleporters to get them there and everyone was willing to leave their homes forever, who’s going to take them in and support them?

      • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Few people are worried about hamas. The concern is for the women and children. The people with no say in any of this. It’s not a crime to refuse to resupply an enemy, it is a crime to starve innocent people.

        • Argonne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately the only right way to go about this is to completely decimate Hamas and force an unconditional surrender then occupy and reprogram Palestinians in the hope that eventually 60 years from now they are able to govern themselves as allies.

          • grte@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually the only hope of truly lasting peace is the dissolution of Israel and the creation of a new state that doesn’t limit citizenship and suffrage along ethnic or religious lines.

            • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I doubt that would work. If history is to be of any indication then Palestinians also have no desire to co-exist with Israel. If the sides were reversed Palestine would be doing the exact same things as Israel is doing. Arabs want Israel gone and it’s been clear since the state of Israel was officially founded in 1948.

            • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              This. Israel never should have been there in the first place. It’s stolen land, ruled by a tyrannical apartheid regime.

          • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Noone wins a war of occupation. You either learn to live with conquered peoples and give them access tibequal rights (Roman empire) or completely erase the local population (Europeans in North America).

      • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same rhetoric as German occupiers claiming that they would not execute civilian hostages as long as Resistance fighters would give themselves up. Sorry for the Goldwyn point but you made it a low hanging fruit.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eye for an eye is a misunderstood quote.

      It actually means tolerance.

      It means you can only take what was taken from you.

      The Middle East has always had an issue with being barbaric. It was intent to mellow it out.

  • FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    212
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The UN and EU consider lots of things Israel does illegal. We just don’t do anything about it and they don’t care.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is true. But it is also because there isn’t a much better alternative.

      The Palestinians don’t have a Nelson Mandela, MLK or Mahatma Gandhi kind of person that the western world can rally around and support.

      Like, I’m sitting here at home in Europe, thoroughly disapproving of Israel, while being also fully disgusted by what Hamas did.

      And I understand why Palestinians fight. I can understand that they can’t be fully pacifist and that they don’t have the capability to wage a normal war, so they result to asymmetric warfare.

      But if they had just cleanly killed or kidnapped the adults and spared the children, that would have been the minimum to not fully alienate a lot of people who are sympathetic to their cause.

      I guess Yasser Arafat was the best they had and it only went downhill after that.

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem I have with the “both sides” argument is while I agree we should not approve of Hamas’ actions, Israel routinely murders civilians without consequence. We tut and tsk but we still send them basically unlimited aid and approval.

        Yes both sides behave badly but one side does so with our explicit support.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t forget how Israel sells world-class spyware to despots and dictators, who use it to terrorise journalists and political opponents.

        • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a bit of a moral difference though. When you say ‘routinely murders civilians’, in a lot of cases we’re talking about protestors throwing rocks or molotovs at police or soldiers. Or when Hamas is firing missiles from a schoolyard or the roof of a hospital. Where do you draw the line where police/army/country has the right to defend themselves? Of course it creates a tense situation and Israel is going to close ranks around those who are far too trigger happy.

          But there’s still a huge difference with Hamas’ stated and demonstrated goal to kill off all jews. Israel is trying to bully the muslims so that they would emigrate, but they’re not killing civilians to wipe them out (if that were the case they would be failing).

          As a comparison Israel is acting more like Morocco colonising the Western Sahara and Hamas is acting like Europeans genociding the Native Americans

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            IDF soldiers have murdered plenty of children. It is routine and I don’t care if they are protesting, they are entitled to protest oppression.

            Hamas are disgusting and Israel are cunts but Hamas is because of what Israel does.

            • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well if you casually leave out that part it becomes a lie by omission. And there’s a reason you have to use this lie both to yourself and to others. It has a whole different ring to it when you say “IDF regularly shoot teenagers throwing molotov cocktails in protest” instead of “routinely murdering children”.

              • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Mohammed Tamimi is the youngest Palestinian killed in the conflict this year

                Mohammed Tamimi is the youngest Palestinian killed in the conflict this year (June 2023)

                Shot in the head by Israeli forces.

                He was 2.

              • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Siblings Ali and Mayar ed-Din, who were killed in an IDF airstrike on May 9, 2023

                Siblings Ali and Mayar ed-Din, who were killed in an IDF airstrike on May 9, 2023

                Damn teenagers get younger with every cull.

            • Locrin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel made those men kill hundreds of people at a concert. They had no other choice. Brave protestors. Do you even listen to yourself?

              • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah they absolutely did, by teaching the people that shit was normal by doing it to them for generations. Murdering civilians who are celebrating is just how they say hi, so they shouldn’t be surprised pikachu face when they do it right back to them.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          We (the EU at least) also send a lot of aid to Palestinians.

          Israel should be sanctioned and decolonized like South Africa was.

          And I, for one, believe that that would have happened a long time ago if the Palestinians had followed the Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi playbook.

          Perhaps I am wrong. Like the rest of the world, I also don’t have the solution for this quagmire.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The experiment has actually been running already. The Gaza Strip is run by Hamas, which is violent and pushes back against Israel however they can. The West Bank is run by Fatah, which has been attempting to keep good relations with Israel and work with them.

            Despite that, the West Bank has seen a continuing encroachment of illegal Israeli settlers, continuing violence directed at Palestinians, both by the settlers moving in there and by the Israeli army. The reason the border with Gaza was so ill-defended was because Netanyahu had moved much of the force usually stationed there into the West Bank. Palestinian deaths in the West Bank has been rising.

            I don’t think the Mahatma Ghandi approach is likely to work in the Middle East. At least no better than any other approach people have been trying has been working there.

          • FMT99@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Development aid, not weapons as the west supplies to Israel. But otherwise you’re right. The whole region should be disarmed.

          • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The US sends aid to palestine as well, just nowhere near as much as we do to israel.

            And there isn’t a good solution. No matter what, everybody will be mad. Mad and not violent would be nice, though.

      • Cerbero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thing also is that those people were also hated during thier time and also called terrorists. There’s no good options for a leader sadly.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was alive when Nelson Mandela was active, and he wasn’t called a terrorist in the west.

          He was revered as a hero by many in the West, just like Navalny is revered today.

          • PaleRider@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So were the IRA…

            And yet now here we are with Sinn Fein holding elected positions.

            At some point there has to be dialogue otherwise you just keep killing one another.

          • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            As opposed to the IDF that’s been terrorizing Palestinians constantly?

            It’s terrorists in both sides. Unfortunately civilians are the ones caught in the crossfire.

          • TGHOST-V0@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            As opposed to the resistants (including many Jews) during WW2 who were literally called terrorists by Nazis ?

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh sure, there is some factions within the West, but on the whole they agree on the big stuff. It’s why they’re all allied with eachother in the first place. It’s not a hive mind, it’s a team.

          • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is the sort of thing that reminds me never to trust the accepted wisdom of internet groups.

            Gandhi after being educated in England was only a little less racist then everyone else when he first went to South Africa and made the famous comment you’re referring to… He then had his awakening against oppression and began to fight for an end to racism, one of the main popular scandals against Gandhi in South Africa was that the medical corp he set up would give aid to whoever needed it first regardless of rank, colour or ethnicity. The rest of his life he wrote and fought for the rights of all.

            But of course ‘popular person was actually bad’ is a fun hot take so of course it’s going to be banded around without any nuance.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The UN condemns Israel as a pastime activity. Nobody in Israel cares what they say at this point.

  • supersane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Obviously illegal. Collective punishment is a war crime and makes Israel a monster. Imagine if there was a murderer in your building and the feds blew the entire building up.

    • Razp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      As is punishing all Russian passport holders for the action of the government. So it’s either both EU and Israel are monsters or neither is.

      • Devi@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not being able to spend summer in the Algarve and being brutally murdered is totally the same thing.

        • Razp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Collective punishment is a war crime”. Except for Palestinians and Russians, of course. And anybody we disagree with. Fuck those civilians.

          We are hypocrites. We have double standards.

          I am just pointing it out.

            • Razp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              You missed the point :

              Russia invades and terrorises the Ukrainian civilians. We punish Russian civilians aka collective punishment.

              Hamas invades Israel and terrorises Israeli civilians. Israel punishes Gaza civilians aka collective punishment.

              In the first case we are OK. In the second case we scream at Israel (the OP post) “Collective punishment is war crime!!”

              We. Are. Hypocrites.

          • Devi@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Collective punishment IS a war crime. Travel is a privelege, not being able to go on holiday to specific places isn’t punishment. Do you realise most countries aren’t permitted to travel somewhere?

            • Razp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not about traveling, and not about Russians at all. I just gave an example. Look,

              Ursula von der Leyen was against Russians destroying the energy infrastructure of Ukraine.

              The same Ursula supports energy blockade of Gaza by Israel.

              It’s just pure hypocracy.

              In both cases the civilian population suffers the most. In both cases it’s a war crime and should be condemned.

        • Razp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Collective punishment is a war crime”. Except for Palestinians and Russians, of course. And anybody we disagree with. Fuck those civilians.

          We are hypocrites. We have double standards.

          I am just pointing it out.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can we agree that “not letting people with Russian passport travel in NATO countries”

            And “Slaughtering civilians en masse in retaliation to a terrorist attack”

            Are just a wee bit different as far “collective punishment” goes?

            • Razp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              You missed the point :

              Russia invades and terrorises the Ukrainian civilians. We punish Russian civilians aka collective punishment.

              Hamas invades Israel and terrorises Israeli civilians. Israel punishes Gaza civilians aka collective punishment.

              In the first case we are OK. In the second case we scream at Israel (the OP post) “Collective punishment is war crime!!”

              We. Are. Hypocrites.

                • zobasha@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Something tells me you still are not getting the point about collective punishment. But hey, you won’t be the first person who can’t see the hypocrisy in all of us.

      • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Launching missiles across borders is different than securing your own borders. You can’t possibly really be trying to equate the two?

        • Razp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Collective punishment is a war crime”. Except for Palestinians and Russians, of course. And anybody we disagree with. Fuck those civilians.

          We are hypocrites. We have double standards.

          I am just pointing it out.

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hmmm let’s stay on topic. I didn’t say I support collective punishment of Palestine or anyone. I said missiles aren’t the same thing as border restrictions, because they clearly aren’t. Do you actually disagree?

      • pascal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a punished Russian living in Lomonosov, let me explain you what has changed for us since this “punishment” started:

        Absolutely nothing.

        (Oh, yes, Coke bottles are now green, instead of red.)

      • GreenM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is not valid in all cases as I know multiple Russians and those living in EU continue to do so with no issue and those living in RU say it doesn’t affect them. You can even find interview with random RU citizens in RU and they all say it doesn’t affect them or that they want to attack UA BC Nato boarder is too close.

        • Razp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          You missed the point :

          Russia invades and terrorises the Ukrainian civilians. We punish Russian civilians aka collective punishment.

          Hamas invades Israel and terrorises Israeli civilians. Israel punishes Gaza civilians aka collective punishment.

          In the first case we are OK. In the second case we scream at Israel (the OP post) “Collective punishment is war crime!!”

          We. Are. Hypocrites.

            • Razp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ursula von der Leyen was against Russians destroying the energy infrastructure of Ukraine.

              The same Ursula supports energy blockade of Gaza by Israel.

              If you don’t see a hypocrisy from our leaders of the west, you brainwashed.

          • GreenM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t think I missed the point though.

            I’m ststating that Russians don’t seem to be directly afected aside from having their favorite EU vacation destinations accessible via France or Turkey instead directly from Moscow. It means that so called collective punishment was either ineffective or so mild, that it had almost no effect on dayly lives of citizens.

            You compare this with bombing city, being cut out of water, food, medicine and energy.

            If anything, Russians collectively punished Ukrainians by shelling,detroying their energy and tradic infrastructure to make winter as bad as possible for UA.

    • Locrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh I love allegories. Let me try.

      Imagine there was a murderer in your building. But he is not really interested in murdering you, he keeps shooting at some other people you also hate. The feds have tried to go into the building to extract the murderer, but his friends and you lynched the feds when they tried. The murderer has stockpiled his guns in the building and the feds figure that if they can’t get to the murderer at least they can destroy his guns and vantage point from which he is firing at people. They don’t really want to destroy the building but the murderer is actively trying to kill people and the people he is trying to kill demands action.

      You receive a text message that the building you are in will be destroyed shortly. You want to leave, but now the murderer says he will kill you if you do.

      It is a very silly thing to think that having a “civilian” stay in a legitimate military target ( rocket launcher and or rocket storage ) makes it a place that is untouchable!

      • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then you left and srill the rocket kills you even when you ate not in the building anymore

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are you telling me there are people being told their building will be blown up who leave the building to go stand just a few meters away on the street it sits on?

      • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no helping the clowns in this forum. They’re lost and don’t understand the costs of living in a terrorist society. There has been billions spend on providing aid, proving avenues, providing resources to the gaza strip.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          “the cost of living in a terrorist society”

          If Hamas orders civilians to stay in buildings that will be bombed, those lives are taken by Hamas, not Israel.

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Israel’s actions are a direct consequence of what Hamas did," Borrell’s spokesman had said in Brussels earlier the same day.

    Uhh, I think you meant to say “Hamas’ actions are a direct consequence of what Israel has been doing to Gaza”

    • AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You really wouldn’t gather this by looking at the media churn. It’s pro Israel to with it’s foot to the floor. If you dare voice distention, you are labeled to be an anti Semite. This successful tactic has been a go to for years. For Israel to know true peace, they need to dump its current leadership. I won’t see this happen in my lifetime.

      • library_napper@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know what media you read, but this has not been my experience with The Intercept, Aljazera, and Democracy Now

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think you answered your own question… None of those are “media churn” AKA mainstream media, but are instead alternative independent media outlets.

    • Syndic@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It both is the case. But it should be really obvious to anyone that even a horrific terrorist attack doesn’t just absolve Israel from international law.

    • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. You’re confused. Hamas is a terrorist society, Israel is not. You do not kill hundreds of innocent people and blame it on oppression.

      • library_napper@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas is Gaza’s government and military. Yes, they’ve committed war crimes and many call them terrorists.

        The IOF is Israel’s military. Yes, they’ve committed war crimes and many call them terrorists.

        • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, you may call them terrorist, but you know deep down that you were wrong… Before Saturday, Gaza Strip had power they had a University they had libraries, and they had shit loads of mosques spread around the city. Now they have nothing because they allowed a religious terrorist organization to run their society. War is awful, innocents die, but ultimately there is a result of change. In this case, the change will be the extermination of Hamas Terrorists at any cost, once and for all.

      • okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m all for open discussions. But… shouldn’t one know the basic facts on a topic before seemingly expressing an opinion on the matter? You clearly need to take an unbiased look at the situation.

        You do not kill hundreds of innocent people and blame it on oppression.

        The oblivious irony of such a statement.

          • okamiueru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do you expect an argument? I’m pointing out what seems to me as a flaw in reasoning based on what seems to be a lack of understanding of the situation.

            • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the thing Mann I don’t misunderstand the situation… You do. The atrocities that Hamas is responsible for is only punishable via death with war comes civilian casualties until we can figure out a way to only kill military personnel. This is literally collateral damage that is inevitable… Israel is doing the right thing Hamas is a terrorist organization Land is not owned by any society. It is owned by the power of the society at the time of its being I know you don’t understand what I’m saying and that’s OK let’s just agree to disagree.

              • okamiueru@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I doubt I’m anything like you, and I also doubt I think like you. I’ve spent my life always critical of what I think, always allowing myself to be wrong. So I don’t look at this situation with the gut feeling and emotion you seem to have. I look at humans, and human behavior. I’m skeptical of any news and media, especially if there is reason to suspect an agenda.

                This is literally collateral damage that is inevitable… Israel is doing the right thing Hamas is a terrorist organization Land is not owned by any society. It is owned by the power of the society at the time

                Each of those sentences combined, paints such a strong picture, that I’m surprised you cannot see it for what it is.

    • Alwaysfallingupyup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      You obviously dont know your history. This all started when Britain made shady deals with a bunch of countries during the first world war. And even before that Israel was on that land before there was ever a Palestine.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Palestinians have been living there for hundreds of years, it is their home. The Isreali settlers started showing up 70 years ago and forced the inhabitants out of their houses. Do you seriously think that Jewish people deserve that land because of the religion of its inhabitants in ancient roman times?

        • Ashsherman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You do know their were always arab jews in tbe region. Just saying from Morroco to Yemen but with Israel’s creation, jews were expelled from every Arab nation. Only Iran let those who wanted to stay in an islamist country.

          • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            When were Jews expelled for every Arab nation? I don’t think that’s true. Like you said “there were always Arab Jews in the region” but they were a minority. The modern Israeli citizens are mostly immigrants though.

          • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That surprises me. I thought sharia law demands that you let peaceful infidels stay as long as they don’t practice their infidelity in public and pay the jizyah. I mean, it obviously sucks and is tailored in a manner that infidels are leaving, but there is no forced relocation as in zionism.

            • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you go by the Quran Jews aren’t even called infidels. They are considered People of the Book. But you are thinking that Arabs follow the Quran devoutly. They cherry pick like all the conservative Christian’s in the west. It doesn’t matter which religion they have they will be hateful against “others” regardless.

            • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              the mistake youre making is comparing sharia law to zionism

              one is religious rules, the other is a political ideology heavily influenced by religious rules

        • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          That was a long time ago, Palestine will NEVER reclaim the land as theirs. Get over it. Just like America took land from native Americans, it is America now. Land is controlled for a period of time by a specific soceity and eventually it transfers to a more powerful society. That is how it works regardless of how you feel.

          • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being bigger and more powerful doesn’t mean you aren’t a bully. Israel being more powerful and more palatable doesn’t mean they aren’t terrorists. The US is a bad example if you’re trying to say Israel was in the right, because the US certainly wasn’t.

      • AmberPrince@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he was referring to the IDFs penchant for shooting Palestinian kids in the back for funsies for the last few years.

      • V0lD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s so easy to blame the British empire for any geopolitical mistake isn’t it?

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The EU may support Israel, but right now they’re calling them out for this bullshit and I’m applauding them for that. Hurting innocent civilians is never a good idea no matter which side of the conflict does it.

    • AdamHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It angers me how many people are now permanently displaced. From what I’ve seen, the numbers are going to be extremely high. How do you rehouse an entire city? Families are going to suffer many hardships because of this. I can’t think of a better way to recruit a new generation for an age old cause.

    • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Palestinian government attacked their neighbor and took hostages. Their neighbor then stopped supplying Palestine with resources.

      It seems Israel is aiming for the best case scenario here, which is for the people of Palestine to overthrow the death cult that controls their state.

      • dmonzel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nice work ignoring the decades of conflict. It’s not like Israel has been stealing all the land they agreed to “allow” Palestinians have for the last 50+ years or anything, right?

        • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re saying they’ve been giving food, water, and energy to people they have been enemies with for “decades”?

          That’s awful nice of them, but it doesn’t change the fact that declaring war is going to get those things taken away.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s called collective punishment, and is a war crime.

        They’re not really neighbors. Gaza is more like a prison controlled by Israel. Israel has controlled Gaza’s electricity, food, water, and the movement of its citizens for many years. I believe even before this attack, Israel only allowed Gaza 4 hours of electricity per day.

        Also, in 2019, the PM of Israel reportedly laid out a strategy to “bolster” Hamas and provide them funding to oppose the Palestinian Authority. Hamas, in its current form, would not have been possible without Israel creating the perfect conditions for terrorist organizations to thrive. Israel keeps the conditions so bad, the average age in Gaza is 18. So, half of those Palestinian death toll numbers we are seeing are likely children.

        • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Refusing to supply the country that invaded you is a war crime??? Since when? Does Ukraine have to keep sending food to Russia?

          And what prison in this world can you fire off 5,000 rockets from?

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Refusing to supply the country that invaded you

            The way I read it, they were already refusing basic human needs. Cart, horse.

            • CensorsHateMe@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Read up on your history. Palestine would be called Jordan if Israel didn’t get involved.

              And it is true we would have peace in the region, because it was never about “israel” and “palestine”. It is about a death cult wanting to kill jews.

              • teuast@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The modern state of Israel exists because a bunch of Christian doomsdayers thought that it existing would make Jesus come back and end the world, and post-WWII seemed like the perfect time to redraw some borders with no consideration for the people already living there. That’s the death cult you’re talking about.

                And I know Judaism views Israel as its ancestral homeland. It’s not like the Jews have no claim to it whatsoever. Additionally, I understand that post-WWII genuinely was a great time to give the Jewish people some reparations. But you’re acting like they’ve been there the whole time and no one else also has a claim to it, and you’re further acting like after the European Christian death cult moved them in there (again, to try and make Jesus come back and end the world), they didn’t then spend the next 70 years viciously subjugating the Palestinians who’d actually been living there for ages.

                MLK Jr. said that a riot is the last voice of the unheard. That’s not true about every riot, but if you have been aware of the geopolitics of this region of the world for more than like a month? and are not being a disingenuous shitbag, then this is the exact type of riot he was talking about. I know you have a lot of trouble with the not being a disingenuous shitbag part, but fortunately it seems like most people here also recognize that.

      • Rawdogg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s pictures of the Israelis landing in palestine by boat 75 years ago begging for asylum, they never stuck to the border agreements over the years and continuously steal land and kill palestinians, Israelis are scum of the earth lowlife colonisers. End of story.

  • Baggins@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hasn’t this always been the case?

    Israel has not been a shining example of virtue over the years. I’m not excusing the disgusting actions by the other side, where they are proved true, as some of the pictures have already been discounted, but this would only make Israel come down harder.

    I don’t the have an answer, but what ever us happening now is certainly not it.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you just want them to sit back and take their genocide laying down? Of course you do, because you don’t really support the Palestine struggle, you’re just clutching at pearls because the thought of the oppressed rising up scares you.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once again with feddit de users saying the literal exact opposite of what I just said and causing me to get 9 billion downvotes.

          • callouscomic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why would anyone care about fake internet votes on meaningless comments? Weird thing to worry about.

            • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              if the comments are meaningless why are you reading them. If nothing here matters why are you here? go away

            • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s less that i’m getting slammed and more that it’s not my fault that i’m getting slammed. Someone else mischaracterized what I said and it’s completely erased what I originally intended and replaced it with the exact opposite, and that’s what people are walking away with.

              • Anamana@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It started out by you misinterpreting the other guys message, so it’s fair I guess.

      • renlok@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you are confused, Israel are the ones who are planning on carrying out genocide.

        • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So you just want them to sit back and take their genocide laying down?

          “Them” refers to the palestinians.

          What the poster is arguing is that Israel incited the attack by years and years of oppression and forced displacement.

          I don’t fully agree with that sentiment. I don’t condone the attack and blaming that on Israel alone is delusional, but I certainly will not “stand for Israel”. Genocide is not an appropriate response and the flimsy excuse of citing the recent attack as the trigger for moving forward with their long-standing plan of ethnic cleansing is despicable.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not confused, that other guy was being bad faith. I even made it clear in my comment who was doing the genocide.

      • Baggins@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not what I said at all.

        Nobody wins here. Parading mutilated corpses and taking hostages is not ‘supporting the struggle’ though.

        • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree that civilian death is always bad but the Palestinians have tried every course they can and they’re still being choked to death, at some point violence is self defense

          • Baggins@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I totally agree, I’m not cutting Israel any slack here - their treatment of Palestine has been awful - and if they weren’t so chummy with USA it’d be a different story. But parading mutilated corpses in the streets etc? There’s no excuse. Whatever side you’re on.

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    So was the blockade. and they did nothing about it . bunch of spineless hypocrites

    • 1chemistdown@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. What is the EU going to do without the US’s approval? UN is out due to permanent security member’s veto power. Going against the USA means loss of a lot of things. Some of them crucial. They literally cannot do a single thing without losing a major thing that directly impacts their citizens.
      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everything is about the US, you know, EU-internal politics regarding Israel are quite complicated.

        I don’t think we managed to officially ban products out of settlements yet but I don’t see them anywhere for the simple reason that they have to be labelled as settlement products, not “Made in Israel”. Israel threw a pretty fit over that, usually EU action (besides stern letters) takes the form of annoying the Israeli right by helping Palestinians.

        Going against the USA means loss of a lot of things.

        …none of which the EU can’t replace. We’ve been in plenty a trade war, you’re welcome to look up how those ended.

        • Ashsherman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Seems to my like most Europe does not like Israel but they’d rather the jews there than back in Europe.

          Just a guess, i cou I d be off by a mile…

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’d rather they’d understand rapprochement even half as well as we do.

        • 1chemistdown@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not everything is about trade wars. All it takes is for the US to say they will not follow NATO security agreements and follow through with that, and if you think that is not possible you haven’t paid attention to the shit show over here. It’s a serious problem and we are not fixing the holes that appeared in recent years.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The EU doesn’t need the US to defend itself – who’s going to invade? Russia? With what army?

            Power projection is another thing but we don’t really want to do that anyways. And the French would rejoice they’d finally get their EU army project really going.

  • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    By just having the power to cut water, electricity and food to other ethnic should ring you a fucking bell deep to your throat about the problem!!!

  • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait! I know what Borrell will do: expel Israel from Eurovision! That will serve them right and start behaving!

    I don’t expect much more from anything leaded by Borrell. We know him well in Spain.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because they’re an EBU member and the EBU includes the whole Mediterranean, have a map. The reason the Arab states don’t compete in Eurovision isn’t because they’re not allowed to, but because Israel participates. Morocco and Lebanon even are founding members, Israel joined in 1957 (look under “past members” Israel switched organisations in 2017).

        Australia got special dispensation to participate even though they’re only an associated member because they’ve been nuts about the contest for ages, constantly hitting very high viewer numbers.

        • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Australia was allowed to participate as a special guest to celebrate the contest’s 60th anniversary. People there liked it and ESC was like “whatever, you may stay”.

          It was like hiring a band for your birthday party, but they turn out to be fun people to have around, so you let them stay after their show.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to be real, I doubt they can even muster the will to write a strongly worded letter with the kinds of members who make up the EU.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Do unto others as others have done unto you.”. – Israel

    That was not the best takeaway, but here we are.