Phwoah calm down with the corruptoligarchophobia there!

Remember that simple trick: if your speech would be derogatory if you replace ‘corrupt oligarch’ by any other minority, then you might want to report yourself to the nearest corrupt law enforcement authority and donate some of your time and money to your local oligarch (they need all the money).

😒

Woah this war stuff is fucked up and out of control. Who could have known?

- Prez DJT

You failed your check: your druid forgot what he was about to do with the downed paladin and tries to summon 8 monkeys.

I don’t agree, they’re all different and deserve to be treated according to their specificities:

• couch fucking wannabe soldier, but scared of gunshots
• top-secret fumbler and self-pissing alcoholic
• Papa Nurgle but a version you don’t want to hug

Okay I was thinking about describing some of them with the war profiteering or corruption angle, but that applies to too many of them so maybe I’m wrong after all

Even by the diplomatic standards of Lavrov, who is usually absolutely unhinged when it comes to logic and morals, this is completely bonkers. Well done, I can’t wrap my brain around this fuckery!

MILF: My goodness now there’s something I’d Like to start a Friendship with

• Ethical issue: products of the mind are what makes us humans. If we delegate art, intellectual works, creative labour, what’s left of us?
• Socio-economic issue: if we lose labour to AI, surely the value produced automatically will be redistributed to the ones who need it most? (Yeah we know the answer to this one)
• Cultural issue: AIs are appropriating intellectual works and virtually transferring their usufruct to bloody billionaires

How do you throw virtual milkshake at an AI rapper?

Gaah they got us this time

Excuse me, can we be left in peace?

The nerve of some people, I swear 😤 /s

Top image: good example of a non sequitur

Bottom image: great example of a non sequitur

Top boffins, usually in disagreement (‘grammatici certant’ as the saying goes), exceptionally reached a consensus here: this is cute.

Well, first of all, absolutely nobody was kung-fu fighting. It was virtually unheard of.

“John Smith”? Doesn’t sound like a local name to me! Yeah don’t bother with the Dakota people ancestry either. They aint from around here. Oh you claim the land belongs to Paleoindian people called ‘Ugluk’ or ‘Kroar’? Well fuck off, glyptodonts should rule this place.

And the boat is sailing in circles, too!

Alexander the Great describing Aristotle: “Chaaaaaaaaarge!” (he was not a great listener)

“Cette course aux armements n’est évidemment pas du tout une course aux armements” a déclaré Maud Brégeon, la porte-parole de l’Elysee (ou est-ce du gouvernement ?). “Oui, nous allons augmenter le nombre de nos têtes nucléaires, afin de rester dans la course aux armements, mais ce n’est pas pour gagner, juste pour participer donc c’est plutôt le trophée de participation aux armements que nous visons. Donc oui mais non en fait” a-t-elle encore ajouté dans une conclusion dont le sens échappe encore aux meilleurs logiciens.

OK, so the great catastrophe of the 5 little monkeys jumping on the bed was not enough? The doctor specifically advised against this type of behaviour. People will never learn. Smh

If yer bullit 'av a 1% chanz to hit da targit, den 100 bullitz 'av a 100% chanz to hit da targit

- Pythagork

You claim he’s not a Great Leader and yet he’s elected with 112% of the votes? And he doesn’t even boast about the 136% voters turnout, because he’s so humble. Please explain to me how a Moderate Leader could do this??? Or even a Slightly Greater Than Average Leader? Only a Great Leader could achieve this 💯 💪 🇰🇵