• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In the Netherlands the police have a network where people can add their home doorbell spy devices.

    It’s horrid and there’s an extreme amount of privacy issues.

    So yes, please continue the fight against excessive surveillance.

  • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Everything related to consumer IoT is more expensive and/or difficult to implement as a local-only service.

    But that doesn’t make any sense. Why would cloud access make anything cheaper?

    Hmmmmm

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      As someone who self hosts I understand the economies of scale that would allow it to be much cheaper to make products tied to cloud service. For example my servers for my house could easily support my entire extended family and more.

      But of course, that profit isn’t enough, and they all double dip into selling their customers’ privacy.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And self hosting can also be cheaper, unless you’re a huge consumer of the service. How many people watch enough Netflix to make the sub cheaper than buying the media instead? We cancelled Disney Plus and bought the few series they like and we’ve already saved money.

        Economies of scale are absolutely a thing, but I think there’s a sweet spot where self hosting can be cheaper for a lot of people.

  • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I got a Eufy doorbell cam years ago because you can do local storage, but I think in 2022 or 23 they were called out for not being fully encrypted, iirc it was the thumbnails for push notifications that weren’t being properly encrypted.

    And that somehow also turned into a realization that Eufy was using those thumbnails to build a facial database because each face had a unique ID in the metadata.

    I should really switch away but haven’t had the money, hopefully soon.

      • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Because I still think the safety and convenience for my family and I outweighs the privacy impact, it’s a camera pointed at a public street.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 hour ago

          it’s a camera pointed at a public street.

          It’s a camera pointed at every person who comes to your house.

      • jdeath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        it’s so funny to see people on lemmy who fell for cloud connected cameras. you’d think this group would be the last to fall for it, maybe not. i’ve even received them as gifts (very expensive ones) but i just threw it in the trash because that is better than anyone using it.

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          i’ve even received them as gifts (very expensive ones) but i just threw it in the trash

          Wouldn’t it have been better to tell the gift giver that you’re really happy that they thought if you, but for security/moral reasons you don’t want to install it? At least they could have returned it and got their money back.

          • Joelk111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            37 minutes ago

            They also wouldn’t have noticed that they hadn’t installed it. Honesty in the best policy.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I do my own onvif cameras but I gifted a ring doorbell to my niece for her apartment. She’s non technical, I can’t support her remotely, and that safety was more important than the loss of privacy of a camera looking out onto a public street.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            the loss of privacy of a camera looking out onto a public street.

            The loss of privacy of a camera that records every face that enters your home and timestamps that data…

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Same. I went with them as a “good enough” option when I needed cameras because I have had a good experience with Anker products, but they’ve slowly enshitified to the point that I’d drop them in a heartbeat if the budget was there.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yes. In fact, it’s long past time, and it’s already been done countless times before; nobody seems to be listening. People have been pointing to growing authoritarian States for years, and yet the entire globe seems to be all-in on giving police states another try (or are so privileged they don’t care).

    Time to take back your privacy yourself. Hopefully this article will reach some normies who didn’t give it any other thought.

    • TomSelleck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’ve noticed that anyone who has gotten one newly installed can’t stop looking at it for every small thing. It’s like built-in paranoia. Not to mention that every time I take a walk in my neighborhood I’m now on bunch of different people’s cameras without even knowing it.

      • lemming741@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I did that for about 6 months, mostly to see how good the detection was in frigate (new 0.15.0 release last week, fyi) when I first got it running but the novelty wore off.

        I see people in line at the grocery store watching their family watch TV in their living room. That’s creepy to me.

  • nick@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I use unifi cameras that save to a local nvr which is inaccessible off my network.

    • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Been eyeing this. I have older unifi internet equipment, and with a recent wifi radio purchase, I realize one seems to need their cloud key or gateway products now

      • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I think you only need the controller or phone app for setup or config changes. Though it is easier, in my opinion, to just run a controller. You can (at least last time I checked) still self host one if you like. If you’re just doing network config and monitoring, you don’t need much in terms of performance.

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Are there good local backup options? I have some Ubiquiti gear but their camera system seems too locked down

      • JordanZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Unifi released their NAS product(just a NAS, no apps). You can archive selected footage to it or some cloud providers. You can also back up a Unifi NAS to another Unifi NAS either at the same location or remote.

        Edit: Just to clarify Protect allows archiving to any CIFS/SMB share. It’s not automatic though. You have to manually export the clips you want.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Blue Iris will use pretty Much any cameras including Ubiquiti, has a mobile app for viewing and alerts, and has self hosted AI object recognition using code project. Its entirely off the grid if you want it to be. I know it just saves to folders that you could backup, but it will also do ftp, etc out of the box

      • nick@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Hm. I’m not sure.

        I know they expose rtsp or rstp or whatever protocol, so maybe you could wire something up to record off the stream.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    If you are going to use a cloud camera system, look into the company and make sure that they have proper E2EE.

    An NVR is probably the best bet, but if you want a dumb consumer cloud cam, HomeKit Secure cameras like Eve are a reasonable solution. It’s all encrypted in iCloud, which cops still hate, which is a good sign.

  • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Some of my neighbors have them and I hate walking down the street. I know it’s a public sidewalk, but hearing all the little pings and “some one is at the front door” it creeps me out. I live in a single party consent state so there’s not like anything I can do but now there’s a database with a record of when I go to/come back from work. I don’t like that. Thankfully, when signing the lease, my landlord forbid in the contact the installation on those. He also owns the houses on either side of mine… a little strip of privacy in a sea of surveillance.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t think single party technically would cover that. The neighbors would have to be involved in the interaction to give themselves permission to record it.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        From what I’m given to understand of my state’s laws, this would be covered under the same kind of thing as the surveillance cameras at a convenience store or shopping center parking lot and the expectations a person would have for their privacy… it just sucks.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      How close are the front doors? I live in a pretty dense city and I’ve never heard them go off like that.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Some are like six feet away and others are set farther back. It’s not all of the ring came 5 that go off. I know there’s a setting where the user can create a like a bounding box so that they don’t go off unless someone is actually at the door… these folks simply haven’t done that, don’t know to do that, or are watching the sidewalk intentionally. At any rate, my street doesn’t have much traffic so I usually just walk in the road.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      90% of it is idiots reporting deer/coyote sightings or falsely reporting fireworks as “gunshots?!?!” at 1:00am. I have literally been woken up by stupid Ring notifications more than by the fireworks themselves.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    My neighbor’s camera caught someone doing a hit and run on my car, eternally grateful for that!

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Except they can do the same thing without opted into a massive surveillance system that tracks your comings and goings and hands it over to the government to be used against you.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Which I agree with… IE I like the system of “your camera catches a hit and run”, you can go knock on their door, ask them to share the footage with you… and you give it to your lawyer, cops or insurance adjusters as you see fit.

      What people like me don’t like is the idea that the cops decide to search your permission, use your footage to prosecute a crime you wouldn’t want to. Imagine the same scenerio… except instead of a hit and run… lets say it was say someone delivering pot… or a hispanic person just going home for the day, and ICE was looking for someone to bother, etc…

      Point is we’re all happy to be witnesses to crimes that hurt people. but we also know you give cops too much power… and you’ll find horrible things happening

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well, after we put in our cameras, the cops did come knocking to investigate a shooting across the street.

        As I explained to the cops: “The cameras trigger on motion, not sound, and they’re only pointed at our property, not across the street. No records.”

        Cops left after that.