• Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How?

      With an average net income ranging from 1100 USD to 2400 USD, any average worker should eat better than this

      This lady monthly rations amount to approximately 160 USD, while the average minimum wage workers spends from 260 to 350 USD worth on groceries

      Which I really doubt is a problem, given that the median of the monthly income in usa is about 5k usd

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what Conservatives around the world want and glory hallelujah we are almost there! The only difference is all those rations will not come from the government but from corporations paid for by the government.

    • 4 boxes Kraft Mac and Cheese
    • 6 cans Heinz Beans
    • Etc.
    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      For a month? It’s just dried shredded leaves wrapped in paper, cigarettes are super cheap to produce, tax makes them expensive.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      average smoker smokes about 20 cigarettes a day. so it’s a little less than half of a monthly use of cigarettes.

      from what i understand the ration was meant to supplement what you consume, not provide everything

      • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Is 20 cigs a day honestly the average nowadays?? Mind blowing and sad. My mum who was an addicted smoker since she was 10 years of age and went through maybe 5 to 10 cigs a day.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          it’s been the average for a long time. it’s due to nicotine’s pharmacological effects. its half life is roughly 1~2 hours. so a smoker on average will feel the compulsion to smoke an hour or so after the last cigarette. since most people are awake somewhere 16 hours a day, that’s about ~16 cigarettes a day.

          your mom’s smoking habits were definitely atypical

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      You didn’t live in the eighties I bet. It was cheap back then and everyone smoked.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reminds me of the leftist venezuelan regime monthly rations in the form of cajas clap.

    Absolutely disgusting food.

    Thank goodness I was able to escape the dictatorship with my family

    • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Thank you for posting this. I don’t understand what a lot of those foods are. It looks like a heck of a lot of it is pasta/noodles based though. And maybe milk powder? Where is the protein other than the canned tuna(?) up at the top.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        That was it. No more than that. Worst thing is that almost all this products are from Mexico. Before the collectivists and leftists took power in Venezuela, we used to make all these products

        Left to right

        4 blue pasta packages, 200 grams each

        4 green rice packages, 1 kg

        4 yellow spaghetti packs. 200 grams each

        6 shredded tuna cans. 130 grams each

        1 oil bottle. 1 liter

        2 red bottles, tomato sauce/ketchup. 220 grams each

        2 orange packs, corn flour, 1kg each

        1 pack of refined sugar, 1kg

        1 white pack, dry whole milk, 500 grams

        2 green packs, black beans, 1kg each

        3 yellow packs, egg spaghetti, 290 grams each

        3 red packs, elbow shaped spaghetti , 200 grams each

        1 blue pack, lentils, 1 kg

        Take into account that this is supposed to last a family of 4 a month. If it ever arrives.

        Because it’s assigned per family

        Also, as most of these products are from Mexico, the transportation is not the best and most of the time they arrive corroded, open by rats, or with less or very different products than advertised

        So yeah I’m glad I escaped the collectivistic hellhole with my family mostly intact

  • Jikiya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s not enough butter. I would have been put down young for rioting about criminally low amounts of butter.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Holy shit that’s a lot. I use about 10 grams per portion of 1 meal, usually breakfast.

        I don’t eat that daily but even like that, 30 full days non stop , that’s like 300 grams

        What the hell are you guys doing up there with a pound of butter?

        Oh no, don’t tell me. I don’t want to know

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can someone calculate the calories in that? I’m too lazy.

    Maybe don’t include the sugar. That’s a shit ton of sugar to go through in month.

    • asqapro@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ballpark estimate, excluding the sugar:

      2.5kg beef: ~6265 Calories

      0.5l vodka: ~1082 Calories

      1.3kg white rice: ~4743 Calories

      1.3kg flour: ~4732 Calories

      500g butter: ~3585 Calories

      300g cooking oil (Google says rapeseed oil is popular in Poland so I used that): ~2652 Calories

      250g chocolate: ~1338 Calories

      Total: 24,397 Calories or ~813 Calories per day

      Some other people online also did the math and came up with similar numbers. For example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37027027 came up with 33,063 Calories (including the sugar)

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nice, that was super fast. I guess it’s probably enough for one person to survive if they practically don’t move at all the entire month, for a little while at least.

        Still not pleasant I imagine.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          What would you be willing to do to ensure that your fellow citizens aren’t dying of literal hunger on the streets?

          (Clearly to most Americans, that answer is “absolutely nothing”)

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Exactly, and thst sounds like the sort of rations Americans had during the world wars. It was supplimented by a mass movement of community gardens. Personally I’m more a fan of the ration points system we used so that you aren’t stuck with stuff you won’t use and those who’d rather eat like Hannibal of Carthage and go less hungry can do that while those who’d rather eat more resource intensive foods like meat can accept the cost of their demands in the form of calories. Though that may just be because I’ve always been the sort who’d rather be full of lentils and potatoes than hungry after a burger, even before I quit meat.

      • kralk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        You get another 333 calories from the sugar, add it to the vodka!

  • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unpopular opinion: we need to ration electricity consumption as well as fuel today, even in capitalists countries. Because that stuff actually has incredible impact on the planet, and will (must) drive consumption down, so that companies / individuals start integrating “efficiency” into their thinking

    I don’t see any other solution to the “exponentially growing power consumption” problem.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pigouvian taxes are a traditional solution to negative externalities, and they are often better received by the public than rationing.

      • It’s expensive to be poor - the lights turning off a few days before the end of the month will incur even more costs than a higher electricity bill.

      • Taxes raise money for other programs, instead of costing money to enforce rationing.

      • Higher taxes in general will also help reduce inflation.

      • Tax revenue can be spent on stimulus checks to offset the cost for people who use less energy than average.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Rather than stimulus checks we need to be using the money to subsidize alternatives. And we can just switch subsidies. Some examples of that include that by reducing cattle subsides we can subsidize lower emissions meat alternatives or even offer free classes on how to cook meals that happen to be lower emissions, and we can stop funding airports and put that money into rail systems, similarly by removing mandatory minimum parking and reducing road funding that money can be put into transit solutions that enable less car centric lifestyles.

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t see any other solution to the “exponentially growing power consumption” problem.

      In the U.S., at least, power generation has been roughly flat for the last 20 years, not growing exponentially:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_of_the_United_States#/media/File:Timeline_of_U.S._electricity_generation_by_major_energy_source.png

  • Kvoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not gonna say that’s anywhere near sufficient, but as a US citizen where do I sign up

    • PixellatedDave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well if you really want to be restricted purchasing the maximum amount of those items then you don’t need to sign up. Just limit your monthly amount to be as displayed.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be ration-limited by what you can purchase? I’m sure that’s a fad diet somewhere.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I might bring tankies out of the woodwork for saying this, but I remember one time a tankie told me that scarcity in communist countries is by design and it’s a good thing, after I pointed out that people had to be on the waiting list just to get a car. What if the person lives in rural with no access to public transport?

        I understand capitalism is wasteful, but doing the extreme opposite and making people wait to own a car or giving someone bare essentials is not a good thing. Having a scarcity economy is not good, especially considering that the Soviet Union produced more tanks than cars throughout its history. The American military industrial complex is rightly criticised for overspending, but communist countries are worse since the case is that more tanks were made than civilian cars. It means more budget went to the military than to producing consumer good. Talk about priorities.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Not a tankie, nor a communist, just a progressive with an interest in history, but,

          after I pointed out that people had to be on the waiting list just to get a car. What if the person lives in rural with no access to public transport?

          Is such a US-centric view. They all didn’t need to drive cars, dude, they had public transportation.

          Edit: Added emphasis for people having trouble reading

              • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                No but the person you replied to called out a specific scenario in which the person lives in a rural area with no public transport access which is a real thing in every single country, with good public transit or not.

                The concept of someone not having access to public transit isn’t an American centric point of view.

          • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, busses were relatively common and affordable, but many of them were smelly and horrible. Except for the Icaruses, the passengers of which felt like kings among men.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not all countries have good public transport system. Imagine living in Siberia at the time of the communists, unless you’re in gulag which doesn’t require you to travel to other places.

        • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Soviet Union had a limited ability to produce things, especially heavy machinery. Their leadership quickly realised that they can’t outproduce the Western countries on everything, so they decided to only match their military production capabilities. Which led to them falling further and further behind.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, are you sure? /s

          Don’t take what tankied say like they mean it, it’s just propaganda / they amuse themselves coming up with lies that you have to unravel and defeat. And if you do so, then magically the discussion is over and we’ll talk about some other thing.