• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is relevant to history. You can either tell the Trump story that a bullet hit his ear, or you can say that he caught shrapnel.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        The only way that would be relevant would be if there was a determination that the shooter was trying to do some kind of ad hoc false flag thing, as opposed to writing his own name into history. Everything we know at this point indicates that the latter is true, and the former is not.

        Whether Trump’s injury was the result of a fired projectile or a piece of shrapnel, the injury was caused by an assassination attempt.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          102
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Whether Trump’s injury was the result of a fired projectile or a piece of shrapnel, the injury was caused by an assassination attempt.

          We all know what really happened.

          • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            52
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            A trick he learned back in his WWE guest star days.

            (This is meant as a joke, please do not be upset. I mean no disrespect to WWE fans.)

          • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You know, it’s funny because the moment I saw the picture where you could see a little blood, I thought to myself “did anyone make sure he didn’t have a ketchup packet in his pockets?”

            And sure enough, I’m never original…

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I thought I was the only one whose first thought was that W wasn’t surprised on 9/11 when I saw the clip of him being informed. Turns out a LOT of people had that thought. 😂

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The truth is still the truth, even if there is no material difference in the implications.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s also relevant because one of Trump’s current campaign statements is that he “took a bullet for America” which may be another lie.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            It would certainly neuter that (over)statement, but I honestly wouldn’t go as far as to call that one a “lie” without some indication that he knew that it wasn’t a bullet he was hit by. I don’t think that even a reasonable person wouldn’t come to the conclusion that “Shots were fired, at me, now my ear is bleeding all over my face” as “I was hit by a bullet.”

          • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            I disagree.

            The sheer number of lies he tells, what difference is one more? Especially an inconsequential one?

            We’re all fairly sure it wasn’t the bullet, but glass, or shrapnel or whatever, but that buries the lede.

            The point here is whether it was an assassination attempt or a false flag attempt (personally I think assassination) and that trumps own hateful rhetoric has created such a ridiculous scenario where this shit happens.

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Because it’s always important to point out the hypocrisy of his fake patriotic bullshit. Every lie should be pointed out, to everyone who will listen.

              • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                But then you lose the bigger point that his rhetoric and horse shit has lead us here.

                You’re too zoomed in.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          except if the shooter was just shooting into the crowd and hit like a railing or something then it wasn’t an “assassination attempt” it was a mass shooting.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Frankly, it could be a mass-shooting anyway, simply one that had a high-profile figure as one of the targets. Apparently he had explosives in his car and some sort of remote detonation mechanism, so it was clearly about more than just Trump alone.

            • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              so it was clearly about more than just Trump alone.

              Not necessarily. To my knowledge, we don’t know where any explosives would have been planted. He was seen wandering around the rally area a few hours before the rally. It’s possible at one point he thought he could plant some explosives near Trump’s podium or something so he gets taken out in the blast, and maybe abandoned that plan when he walked around and realized it wasn’t viable.

              IMO, there’s nothing indicating he had any intents other than taking out Trump by any means available to him. Anyone else was probably either collateral damage in his mind, or “deserved it” for being Trump supporters in the first place. He may have decided that trying to snipe him from that rooftop was his most viable option, but it looks like he woke up that morning with at least two separate plans on how to go about it.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Fair. None of that speculation is inherently any better than the mass shooting speculation though, there’s similarly zero indication he had anything personal against Trump. He even had potential dem targets in his search history. There’s no sound evidence for anything so far, that I’ve heard at any rate.

                Though I do think it’s a little far-fetched that what appears to be an intelligent engineering student is going to think sneaking over and planting explosives is going to be a viable plan. That’s a little video gamey.

                • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s a lot video-gamey. Let’s be realistic…the United States Secret Service just got owned by a 20 year old kid camping in one of the windows from Nuketown. The kid looks like he got beat up for his lunch money last week. Whatever plans were gong through his head, the plan he ultimately settled on involved him climbing to the one rooftop that the Secret Service somehow missed and was somehow able to not get caught until he fired off half a dozen or so shots. Everything he did that we know of so far looks like something a newbie would do the first time they played COD.

                  We’ll of course never really know his true motives. Remember that despite all the speculation over political motives, Ronald Reagan’s would-be-assassin did it because he was trying to impress a teenage Jodie Foster. For all we know, this kid could have woke up that morning and believed that Trump was Gargamel and it was his responsibility to kill him in order to save Smurf Village. Why he suddenly wanted Trump dead remains a mystery especially since he was supposedly a long-time Trump supporter, but I haven’t seen anything to make me believe that his target was anything other than Trump himself, and maybe anyone who was just unlucky enough to be in the way.

                  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Again, there is also no evidence he specifically wanted Trump dead and was not simply committing a blaze-of-glory act of terrorism for some misguided chance at fame. Having no evidence does not mean we default to one preferred interpretation.

                    Regarding the rooftop, from all indications he carefully scouted his method. The drone, the rangefinder, the ladder, etc. The building was local police’s responsibility, as well, they actually even had a cop inside that very building. Regardless though, it certainly was embarrassing for the SS anyway, hence the director resigning.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          ad hoc false flag

          Dont be in such a rush to rule this out lol. Ad hoc false flag should be Trump’s middle names

          He’s always been a real ad war hoc

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The grenade landed 18.6 metres (61 ft) from the podium

            Bush was thrown at by someone who couldn’t throw

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            The grenade failed to detonate. Although original reports indicated that the grenade was not live, it was later revealed that it was. After Arutyunian pulled the pin and threw the grenade, it hit a girl, cushioning its impact. The red handkerchief remained wrapped around the grenade, and it prevented the striker lever from releasing.

            No mention of it being “a training grenade [which] could not fire.” Source?

        • rsuri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I think there’s essentially no limit to what the shooter’s motives could be. What was the Las Vegas shooter’s motive? What was the motive at Columbine? There’s a million possibilities. Narcissism, delusions, non-specific rage.

          Sure, there’s one conclusion that seems simplest, which is that he shot at Trump but missed. And if he grazed Trump’s ear, that’s almost certainly true. But what if it comes out that the FBI finds that the closest shot was over 10 feet away from Trump? If that happens, I think we’d be fools to continue to assume it was an assassination attempt.

          The smartest thing anyone could say at this point is “I don’t know”.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s still not very relevant. Either way he was shot at and his ear was hit. Whether or not it was a whole bullet, part of a bullet after the bullet hit something, or something that the bullet busted off that hit his ear is of minimal importance.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      If it was shrapnel then it dispels the idea that if he’d turned his head just a few inches it would’ve been death.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The only interesting thing about it might be that it once again points out the hypocrisy of the right.

      They mocked John Kerry as undeserving of his purple hearts, and wore fake bandaids because he was hit with shrapnel.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think what you’re trying to say is that “either way he still survived an assassination attempt”, which I agree with, but the details still matter.

    • DBT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s relevant to the folks who believe in divine intervention, isn’t it?

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The folks who believe in divine intervention don’t care about what actually happens in reality in any case, so no, it’s not relevant to them, either.

        • DBT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would think that the difference between it being a bullet vs a piece of glass would be the difference between divine intervention or not to many of them.

          • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            4 months ago

            If logic worked on religious people, then there wouldn’t be religious people. They will just say the bullet WOULD’VE killed him, but god stopped it and only hurt him with glass. God can’t be proven or disproven, so those that want to see divine intervention always will.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you’re someone who’s going to claim divine intervention, it’s to reinforce your own beliefs, and message to the people who hear you that you hold those beliefs. Glass vs. bullet isn’t going to matter.

    • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s relevant in that Trump is probably dishonest again.

      The situation is shocking enough if he was hit by glass in an assassination attempt, but they couldn’t resist lying and saying the bullet hit his ear.