• psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah. I asked GPT3 for some heliostat code, to keep reflected sunlight stationary. It was wrong, it hallucinated libraries that didn’t exist, but it roughed out a program that was easier to fix than it would have been to start from scratch.

    Maybe its superpower is beating inertia, getting you started

    • Dultas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, I’ve used it for a lot for one off data processing / graphing code, stuff that is to big to process in a spreadsheet. It usually gets like 95% there. The real issue I have is if you ask for too many one off adjustments it gets confused and reverts previous changes when you ask it to make new ones.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      How good is it at correcting things you point out directly? I haven’t used it for coding yet but have noticed it’s ok at correcting mistakes when you point them out. Still hit or miss though.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It was ok. I and it went through about four iterations going from “that’s a sun tracker, I asked for a heliostat” through undeclared variables, global variables that should have been local until it was a fine program with just the fault that there was no such library as solar::heliostat [azimuth, altitude]

        I have read that people have run into that sort of problem and have written the library the AI called for, but I looked up a real astronomy library