• WatDabney
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    8 months ago

    So… by my count, the board of directors actually outnumber the employees.

    At a “non-profit” (until that was revoked) company that gets most of its funding through Patreon.

    Years from now (and at this rate, not very many of them), when people wonder how it was that such a promising venture that championed decentralization turned into just another enshittified megacorporation squatting over a piece of internet real estate and extracting rent to pay obscene salaries to a handful of executives - this is how. We’re watching as the foundation is being laid, right now.

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      8 months ago

      For non-profits (like 501©(3)'s) that’s not unusual. Non-profits are more like specialized tools for the board of directors than like companies.

      Source: First ten years of my career were at non-profits.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s an abuse of non-profits for financial engineering. They’re intended to work exactly like companies, except without a monetary profit for shareholders.

        Source: Got plenty of blank stares when I tried to set up a non-profit, “you’re not yet big enough to think about tax evasion”, they’d keep telling me 😒

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is the board paid? I thought it was a volunteer position, where you meet based on a certain cadence and vote on enterprise matters.

      I’m also quite wary of corp/venture/capitalist influence on masto/fedi/décentralisation.

      • WatDabney
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would presume it’s not paid yet (though the CEO certainly is). That phase of the operation comes later.

        For the moment, they’re working to solidify as much control as possible of as much of the fediverse as possible, which control will allow them to gatekeep it, monetize it, extract rent from it and inevitably enshittify it. That, so it’s hoped, will be the phase during which their investment now will pay off.

    • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      What do you mean by Mastodon selling out to Meta? Isn’t Meta just building an ActivityPub based platform so we can talk to their users as far as I know. If they want to talk to us, then the onus is on Meta to stay compatible. If they aren’t, then we just continue on as we have.

      • JayTreeman@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Please look up ‘embrace, extend, extinguish’ Meta should be met with open hostility in the fediverse. Mastodon losing nonprofit status in Germany, moving to the states and then appointing this guy leads me to think that mastodon has been compromised

        • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Don’t worry I’ve been quoted EEE enough times. I really don’t think that is the direction this will go down. If Meta actually embraces it, then the whole of the fediverse grows over all. Then, if Meta does extend the ActivityPib protocol in a way the that becomes incompatible with the rest of the ecosystem, we just let them go and do their own thing. ActivityPub already has a userbase, if they join us, and then later on cause problems then everything just goes back to how it is right now. The final E can’t realistically happen because the existing ecosystem will just carry on exactly as it is now. If people on Threads want to communicate with us, then they need to speak the same protocol. If they don’t, then they don’t get to participate.

          Do you genuinely believe that the whole community of the fediverse would just lie down and accept breaking changes to the protocol without resistance? There are too many talented and passionate people invested in this ecosystem, the absolute worst case scenario is the protocol itself gets forked, and again the exist communities just carry on. There is no extinguish time line. Everyone points to how Meta handled XMPP, please compare the user bases of ActivityPub vs XMPP. The world has changed a lot since then. Another example I’d like to point out is Hashicorp’s Terraform. They explicitly tried to EEE, and the moment they attempted the final E, it was instantly forked, and the open licensed fork was adopted into the Linux Foundation and the ecosystem carried on.

          Take that what you will, but I am reasonably convinced ActivityPub has enough support and community that any EEE attempt will inevitably fail. The front ends will change, the hosters will come and go, the open standard is here to stay.

          • mayooooo@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The whole community won’t lie down, but a lot of the visible members will spread their legs. This is the nazi at the table situation, and for a project that was supposedly created to get away from the toxic model of facebook and twitter this is something like a parody. The only people who get something out if this are the people who are not us. Now maybe you are right, maybe the community will prevail. It’s just that it doesn’t have to shoot its own feet every two minutes in the dumbest fucking way possible

            • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s sorta the curse of an open protocol is that anyone, even your enemies, can use them. I am no fan of Meta. I am a big fan of open standards, monkey’s paw and all. It is not a case of tolerating the intolerant. To restrict Meta out of using ActivityPub is against the spirit of open standards. The protocol is no longer open, and THEN we really have something to worry about.

              • mayooooo@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Sure, but I would make an exception for meta because they are genocide enablers. Even if that’s too much I don’t understand people who keep saying it’s all fine, it’s great even.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re correct. ActivityPub is an open protocol and Meta, or more importantly anyone else, can use it however they want.

      • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I view the bigger issue as Meta is hostile towards humanity’s privacy and freedom, and Mastodon leadership view Meta joining the Fediverse as an unqualified win. Meanwhile, I don’t think Meta is interested in ActivityPub as a protocol to make Instagram Threads more appealing, I think they’re overall much more interested in what data the can gain, and sell, analyzing the interactions between their own user pool and the rest of the fediverse that user pool interacts with.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are any number of Mastodon forks out there. Misskey and its forks are really good. Pleroma and Akkoma are good, and so is Friendica.

      Mastodon has always been an exercise in attention and influence seeking for Gargon. The rest of us don’t need him or it. It’s just a trademark.

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    This isn’t both concerning and also totally in line with every move Gargon’s made along the way. Nope nope nope!

    • sexy_peach@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t necessarily agree that this is concerning. I never thought of gargron of making good moves either though.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would like to do more research on alternative non-profit governance structures. In my experience, non-profit boards seem to be just another mechanism by which the wealthy control decision-making in society. However, I don’t know what kind of structure would be better.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think workers coops are definitely better than private ownership but it seems like there should also be some involvement of the broader community being served (or negatively impacted in some cases) in the case of non-profits.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Love me some Anark—I did watch this but I don’t remember seeing much detail on how community governance works. Is it in there and I missed it?

            • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              From what I understood after I watched it and looked into it a bit more is that individuals have roles within the organization and are able to decide their own actions on how to fulfill that role. The actions are informed by the collective understanding of their goals and norms that are formed during their frequent meetings (which are very different in vibes from regular corporate meetings).

              This is how I understood it works for most decisions but there a few decisions that fall back on voting which after the vote occurs the individuals are expected to carry out whatever was voted on.

              So like it says in the video it is a largely informal structure but one that seems to work very well.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Workers coops tend to fall apart when they’re made of non business savvy workers who just want to do their job. They tend to delegate the business “chores” onto someone more savvy… who ends up simply stealing from them.

              • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                So you don’t have one then? I’ve seen plenty of research on worker coops, and I’ve never seen any that supports this idea. Without any evidence I’m left to conclude that this is just capitalist apologia.

                • jarfil@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I have first-hand experience, actually too much of it. Feel free to conclude anything, you can even set up a worker coop and get your own data; be the change you want in the world, and all that.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        So the employees who are employed by donations, or all contributors? Not trying to throw a wrench in your suggestion, just wondering what this would look like for masto

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think this can be both a benefit and a risk, since Mastodon is still what it is and won’t change because of a board. Biz could provide Eugen a lot of insight, but by the same risk, Eugen may want out and turn Masto profitable.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    Mastodon’s service, an open source, decentralized social network and rival to Elon Musk’s X, has gained increased attention following the Twitter acquisition as users sought alternatives to X’s would-be “everything app” that felt more like the old Twitter of days past.

    As part of the “fediverse” — or the open social web made up of interconnected servers communicating over the ActivityPub protocol — Mastodon benefits users who no longer want to be locked into a centralized social network that can be bought and sold to new billionaire owners, like Musk.

    “…we have received a notice from the same tax office that our non-profit status has been withdrawn,” wrote Rochko on the Mastodon blog.

    Mastodon’s day-to-day operations were unaffected by this change, as most of its income comes from the crowdfunding platform Patreon.

    It also received donations from Jeff Atwood and Mozilla at $100,000 apiece, which allowed the company to hire a third full-time developer this year.

    In addition to Biz Stone, other board members include Esra’a Al Shafei, a human rights advocate and founder of Majal.org; Karien Bezuidenhout, an advocate for openness and experienced board member across sustainable social enterprise; Amir Ghavi, a partner at law firm Fried Frank, where he’s the co-head of the Technology Transactions Practice; and Felix Hlatky, the chief financial officer of Mastodon since 2020, who originally incorporated the project as a nonprofit LLC in Germany and helped it raise additional funds.


    Saved 44% of original text.