• BleepBlop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Trading permanent hostilities with your largest neighbour in exchange for extra security from said neighbour. We live in depressing times.

    • Ninmi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Niinistö said at the start of the war that “the mask has been taken off, revealing only the face of war”, and I think it describes the situation perfectly. Largest reason we’ve stayed out of NATO was based on the trust we’ve naively placed on having good relations with Russia to provide security. Any trust by any party on Russia is now, of course, obliterated.

      To my knowledge, joining NATO does not change much else than giving us the article 5. It’ll likely invite a lot of nastiness from Russia, but removing the now obvious existential threat should be more than worth it. The baltic states were right. I don’t want Finland to be in this position ever again.

    • QuentinCallaghanOPA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Seeing what Russia has done recently based on a sketchy premise tells enough how it doesn’t provide us security.

  • isleofmist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    nato’s expansion east is one of the reasons we got into this mess. Can we at least wait until the war ends?

    • FruitFactory@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t think you can really put the genie back in the bottle here. After the last month every country that borders russia and isn’t allied with them is going to be reaching for NATO with both hands.