CHEF-KOCH@lemmy.mlBanned to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 年前KDE/Gnome Wayland vs. X.org Radeon Linux Gaming Performancewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down10
arrow-up110arrow-down1external-linkKDE/Gnome Wayland vs. X.org Radeon Linux Gaming Performancewww.phoronix.comCHEF-KOCH@lemmy.mlBanned to Linux@lemmy.ml · 4 年前message-square2linkfedilink
minus-squareTiukulinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 年前Tldr; Wayland is a bit faster than X, Gnome is a bit faster than KDE. I wonder if there is some clear reason for the Gnome/KDE difference, or is it just bits and pieces here and there?
minus-squarenachtigall@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 年前The comments under the article speculate that composition may not have been disabled during testing under KDE and the performance would have been the same if it was disabled.
Tldr; Wayland is a bit faster than X, Gnome is a bit faster than KDE.
I wonder if there is some clear reason for the Gnome/KDE difference, or is it just bits and pieces here and there?
The comments under the article speculate that composition may not have been disabled during testing under KDE and the performance would have been the same if it was disabled.