if you’re actually interested in the story behind this report, here ya go

suggest more appropriate community for it in the comments

  • graphitoOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wonder were there any victimless crimes? for example watching porn at home from corp laptop

    if so, do you know how the trials of such cases usually went? or it’s all one-on-one conversations/decisions?

    • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I was only looking at things coming in and going out through the corporate firewall. We were in a correctional environment so porn was prohibited. I was mostly interested in things that were illegal or dangerous. I dealt with anything that wasn’t criminal. Anything that wad criminal I referred up them responded to requests from the investigating officer when they came. I often got requests from managers to pull full histories and look for things that were outside of my remit like wasting time at work. I refused those requests and any that were overly broad. Once an investigator got to know me they figured out how to make requests that I would agree to fulfill.

      • Numenor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not on you, but forbidding porn due to it being a correctional environment seems inhumane. I’m sure they’d be happier with access to at normal porn. Restrict illegal shit of course

        • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 months ago

          The problem is that many of the people inside are violent sexual offenders and porn can be used as currency in the illegal prison economy. I have no issues with porn personally but it was my job to enforce the policy. I was really only interested in illegal porn which is clearly defined in Canadian law.

            • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              There were a number of people who had the legitimate and sanctioned need to access prohibited material (I was one of them). At the time (and even now) it is virtually impossible to open every website that someone might need to access. Personal use was allowed as long as it didn’t impact your work and was inside the guardrails. We tried using Websense back then and it was a disaster. Virtually everyone complied with policy. There were a very small number who didn’t and I was responsible for catching them.

      • graphitoOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        it sounds like you can get provided for till the rest of life if you sue your previous employer. Gotta order up few kevlar shirts to court hearings just in case tho

        • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I left there almost 15 years ago and have been working for US companies in international security. I have never looked back.