The former president’s legal team requested a trial delay, saying Habba had been exposed to COVID and had a fever. She attended the party one day later.

Donald Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, was spotted rubbing elbows with Republicans in New Hampshire on Tuesday, just the day after asking for a delay in the ex-president’s defamation trial because she was feeling under the weather.

On Monday, one of the nine jurors considering writer E. Jean Carroll’s second defamation suit against Trump was excused for being ill.

Though Judge Lewis Kaplan and Carroll’s lawyers agreed to continue the trial with eight jurors, Trump’s legal team requested a delay, saying Habba had been exposed to COVID and had a fever. She was not wearing a mask during the hearing.

The next day, however, Habba was sighted celebrating Trump’s win in the New Hampshire primary by NBC News’ Garrett Haake.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Let’s hope for the best case scenario: she actually did have covid and spread the virus to other totalitarian ghouls

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        155
        ·
        10 months ago

        This isn’t 2021 or even 2020. Catching covid right now is no longer a big deal, especially that you have access to the best doctors.

        • thesystemisdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          125
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          COVID is still a big deal. People are still getting sick and dying. In the US, it’s still claiming about 1,500 lives weekly.

          Long COVID significantly affects the quality of life for many.

          The best doctor can only advocate for the best treatment. Your continued good health is dependent on your vigilance.

        • Queue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          84
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          As a person with long covid, people like you can go fuck yourselves

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If we were talking about the normal populace, sure. But we’re taking about an aged and under-vaccinated group.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Please, Republican politicians are all vaccinated. They just pushed that shit to please the plebs

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              10 months ago

              As opposed to people who prefer cancer drugs?

              That’s about an equally flippant, equally bullshit response. Ivermectin isn’t just “horse dewormer”, it’s a pretty broad and widely used anti-parasitic, which when it was discovered in the 70s was referred to as a “wonder drug from Japan” because it works in a wide variety of mammal species (including humans, often being used to treat scabies or intestinal worms) against a wide variety of parasites.

              Right wing idiots spread the idea that an anti-parasitic is an appropriate treatment for a viral infection, but that doesn’t change that you should respect the fucking drug and all the good it has done in the last half century.

              • mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Context: you’re reading a thread about Covid. Ivermectin is not a cure for Covid. Nothing else you said is relevant.

        • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Statistics indicate you are not a researcher. Stick to the like and dislike button on YouTube. Dunning Kruger thanks you for your service.

    • Lon3star@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      Seems like contempt and a large fine would be in order… Which has already happened to Trump lawyers in recent history

    • Kalkaline @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe, but just maybe she kills a bunch of Republicans with COVID. A net positive for society if that happened.

    • RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 months ago

      Technically, I think she said she could fake being smart.

      I think she’s got the faking part down. Still waiting to hear from the jury about the smart part.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s just mind boggling, someone who went to school for at least six years and passed the bar could actually be that dumb. Arrogance that suggests Dark Triad?

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Still, the bar exam is no easy peasy task! Unless they bribed the proctor, which is also possible but I’m trying not to go full tinfoil hat!

          • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s one thing to be “smart” enough to memorize answers to a test. Hell, I’m damn good at it myself. But it’s another thing to have common sense and good judgement. Obviously this lawyer is a prime example of being one and not the other.

              • sin_free_for_00_days
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I never thought I was smart or dumb, just like a really, really good test taker. I didn’t retain close to what I should have from my university years.

                • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Same. Pretty much I retain information just long enough for it to be useful, then I forget it as soon as I start learning/doing something else.

              • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                How else do you explain being able to pass any exam, bar or not, if you do not memorize answers? Granted, I’m not suggesting that anybody knows the exact questions on any exam, but rather that you study material that gives you the answers to whatever questions may be asked.

            • Maeve@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I retract you can not memorize a bad exam. Thinking of Miriam Bialik’s photographic memory. Agree some states have low bar exams🤣.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        In a sane world, yes. In the world we live on where money is the main thing that matters and everyone is afraid of what the 30% of America that supports a literal dictator will do as a response to any negative actions taken on trump is seen as an attack on their entire culture.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The plan is now to delay delay delay so Trump can enter the election. Then when he wins he’ll just pardon himself and be like, “What are you talking about? Remember when I said Biden could do it?”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is both a civil suit and a state case. Trump would have no pardon power here. Habba is just stupid.

      • sin_free_for_00_days
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        I keep seeing people say this, and factually/logically it’s true. But according to The Constitution, trump is disqualified from even holding the office. If he gets elected, he’s already talked of suspending The Constitution, political revenge, mass firings of civil service positions unless swearing fealty to him, and being a short term dictator. It feels strange and needlessly bombastic to say this, but there is a chance it’ll be game over.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you can explain how Trump can pardon himself from a state civil trial, go for it. Because the much simpler explanation is that Habba is an idiot.

          • sin_free_for_00_days
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Well, as I thought I said, if you can say explain how an insurrectionist can be elected, I’ll say how state courts don’t mean shit. Honestly though, I think it’s all academic. trump lost the popular vote by 3 million the first time, and 7 million the second. I can not see him doing any better this time around. Then again, that first win did surprise me, so fuck, who knows? Might be a little harder to launch a coup from the outside. Or maybe he’ll be in jail. Haha, right.

            Edit: And yeah, whatever happens, Habba is indeed an idiot.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          But according to The Constitution, trump is disqualified from even holding the office.

          The Constitution provides no explanation for who makes that determination under the 14th amendment and under what standards they are to do so. And that is going to be the core of any legal fight over his candidacy - who determines eligibility under 14A and under what standard. Trump and his lawyers will almost certainly aim for the answer being either Congress or a criminal trial, while most on this sub hope that any state judge of SoS should be able to disqualify him nationally on their opinion alone.

          The authors of the 14th probably didn’t think it was necessary, since they could just go “see that group over there engaged in open rebellion? we mean the people publicly in charge of that”, but that’s…fuzzier with the J6 stuff. It’s not like Trump publicly led the attack on the Capitol, he’s too much of a spineless wimp for that.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Furthermore, I am not sure that I really want random State judges determining what counts as insurrection. We already have Greg Abbott claiming that Texas is being actively invaded and the Federal Government is doing nothing about it. If Trump is thrown off the ballot because of the 14th Amendment, I have no doubt that some Texas judge will proclaim Biden as the leader of the Invasion of Texas and throw him off rhe ballot as well…

            … which might be the outcome all of us Lemmings have wanted all along, but not quite like this.

          • sin_free_for_00_days
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I could pontificate on the other side, but I think this The Atlantic article does a much better job of explaining the 14th Amendment.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If he were to be elected, would there still be an avenue to disqualify before taking on the oath? He would be the president-elect, not the president, until sworn in.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Huh… so would Biden stay president until the court cases are dealt with? How’s that work?

          • kbotc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Nope, it goes to the Speaker of the House, but more likely the Supreme Court would just pull a 2000 and assign the presidency.

            • sin_free_for_00_days
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Wait. Really? So say Biden/Harris are Pres/VP. trump/CarrotTop are pres/vp-elect. trump gets disqualified before the inauguration, so when the inauguration comes around, Biden/Harris are out because they lost, and trump has been disqualified, so it goes to the Speaker? Why is CarrotTop disqualified?

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              but more likely the Supreme Court would just pull a 2000 and assign the presidency

              They really didn’t do that though. They essentially decided two things:

              1. A state counting some ballots under different rules than other ballots violates equal protection.

              2. Election deadlines are legal and enforceable.

              Gore wanted to recount a handful of places under a different standard than the rest of the state (basically changing how to handle undervotes, overvotes, that sort of thing) after the previous count and recount under the state standard did not give him a win, starting this recount just a couple of days before the deadline. Bush asked for an injunction and for SCOTUS to sort it out, and SCOTUS heard the case and issued a judgement in frankly record time, but that still meant their opinion was issued 2 hours before the deadline.

              Those looking into the Florida 2000 election after the fact actually came to the conclusion that the last recount Gore called for wouldn’t have caused him to win if completed, but an estimate by one org suggests that had it been a statewide recount under the standard Gore wanted to use that that would have tipped things in Gore’s favor but that’s not a count that had ever been put on the table.

        • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not sure. This whole ordeal is pretty much uncharted, so any searches come up with him and not really anything else.

          I do however think I remember there being something that could make the presidency be pushed to the runner up if something isn’t followed. It was from high school, so my memory is a bit foggy.

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Disbar immediately. Let him pay for a real lawyer or qualify as indigent if he claims he can’t afford it.

  • 𝐘Ⓞz҉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I am waiting for the day when she starts her Onlyfans to sell #MAGA merch.

    Edit: I am kinda into her. Got a thing for lawyers