• flamingo_pinyata
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that they needed to receive a lot of complaints to reconsider makes me wonder - do they even do any kind of usability testing for their products? Anyone who even sat in a car with only touchscreen can tell you the experience is not comfortable.

    And I don’t think it’s just about the price of physical buttons. Buttons are a selling point right now, they could charge a small premium (not in the thousands but ~$200 certainly.

        • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Never read from a book that summons demons

          I know they said “What you do in High School will affect your entire life” but I didn’t think it would be this bad! It was only once! I swear!

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s probably a cost issue. Running one wire harness to a touch screen is a lot cheaper than running a wire to every button in a car.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also a “We can charge $900 for this $80 touchscreen when it fails in 5 years because your car is a brick without it” issue.

      • SheeEttin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is the button panel not a separate unit? I’d imagine it would have a connector to plug into the cable that runs back to whatever control system, instead of it being a bundle of individuals.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even if it’s a subassembly there’s gonna be more connectors in it, and probably more wire since it will need to run to the various buttons.

          When you’re making tens of thousands of vehicles every penny counts.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say the touch screen will be just as complex, probably more.

            It will require the same controller hardware that’s usually in the heat/ac controller that has buttons and knobs, just controlled from a touchscreen.

            You’ll still have the same wiring to servos from the control unit, but you’ll also have wiring for the touchscreen and its’ computer.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You have the software design costs, which are high but one-off, so they’re amortised over the entire production - and it’s either the same or nearly the same across each brand’s entire range

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh they KNEW what they were doing and just didn’t give a fuck.

      We need a People of Walmart equivalent for this bullshit. Start finding the designer/engineer/manager responsible for this garbage and shame them publicly.

      How does this stuff pass any kind of Accessibility regs?

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Besides cost, we should probably at least entertain the idea that we are a vocal minority. I’d be completely unsurprised to find out that the majority of people hardly ever touch the controls that got moved to touchscreens and, if they do, they don’t really care - they can set them before they set off, or do it while driving and wobble all over the road, but hey everyone does it so what does it matter?