• rigo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are the different solutions? Genuinely asking. Seems like a large aspect to skip since it represents the majority of the US LOL

    • trident_burger@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Provide regularly scheduled public transportation that feed into denser urban areas. Make it easy to bike in denser urban areas.

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So to provide regularly scheduled public transportation we would need to build out rail infrastructure to country areas? I suppose a park and ride system would be effective but what would still require a mass buildout.

        I’m thinking of areas like this one I attached. The nearest cities are 1hr drive from most towns, the cities are all small-midsized so don’t have that many jobs (proportionally) in the first place. The solution is to put train stations in every town? Every other town? Then the cities themselves would need to build out rail infrastructure because Albany and Syracuse have very little in the way of public transportation.

        Genuinely asking, not trying to come across as snarky. This is actually a middle-ground example. I could show you a map of WV or Western PA if you really want to see rural.

        • trident_burger@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean…yes? Absolutely, improve rail infrastructure in Albany and Syracuse. Build park and rides at places that feed into that improved system. Improve bus service (or train? Looks like there are already tracks in many places) along higway corridors with moderately sized communities.

          Can counties or cities currently afford this without sacrificing something? No.

          Would the federal government and states need to spend hundreds of billions, if not trillions, over several decades to make happen? Yes.

          • rigo@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah the track system is largely in place (not sure if freight or passenger). I’m not trying to argue lol. I’m just asking questions. So in your world there would be a mass spiderweb of intersecting trains that sprawls out to everywhere (obviously a kind of park and ride situation) and that would feed into the cities or other communities.

            Makes me think about the whole idea of the Green New Deal that Sanders was talking about when he ran the first time. Get a giant workforce of people out there building railways and stations. Would be interesting to see for sure.

    • Kapitel42@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A part of the problem are zoning and parking space laws preventing businesses to open up where people live. If you cant be close to residential areas and have to have an insane number of parking spaces it is hard to operate a shop in small towns.

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This, and also just the mass commercialization of everything. The majority of towns don’t have small businesses any more, it’s all chains…or they drive to the nearest Walmart. There was a good article in the NYtimes recently about this and how dollar generals are basically taking over in rural communities. There aren’t enough people in these towns to support a diverse set of businesses, so the businesses shut down and a Dollar General moves in because it covers most basic needs.

    • Obi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For sure for sure, not saying it’s easy! Different solutions include public transports (trains, buses, etc), electric bikes + appropriate paths, electric/hydrogen vehicles, car pooling, offsetting emissions some other way, etc etc.

      It’s also about having towns and villages that are “self-sufficient” to a degree where you don’t need to drive to the huge mall or whatever on the regular, and can just pick up the groceries for tonight’s dinner on foot/bike (and yes that means having smaller supermarkets with less choice, but they’re closer! It’s great).

      Truthfully even in the Netherlands (where I live) once you get to the countryside every household has a car as well, we do too, living in a rural area. But we can still go do our grocery shopping, and most other things on foot/bike. The car is still necessary for work and getting to some other places though.

      And that’s also mainly because we don’t have a train station here and my work takes me to random addresses daily with heavy equipment.

      Anyway another part of my point was that if you don’t have a good solution for countrysides, then that shouldn’t stop y’all from moving forward with solutions in city centers and suburban areas.

      • rigo@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah for sure. I love looking around the world at different examples including you guys. I grew up in a very rural hilly area so it’s just what I think of first. Completely agree that we should make the changes we can make and figure the rest out later.