• noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    Beeper Mini avoids some of those problems because it’s operating in a fundamentally different way. Its developers figured out how to register a phone number with iMessage, send messages directly to Apple’s servers, and have messages sent back to your phone natively inside the app. It was a tricky process that involved deconstructing Apple’s messaging pipeline from start to finish. Beeper’s team had to figure out where to send the messages, what the messages needed to look like, and how to pull them back down from the cloud. The hardest part, Migicovsky said, was cracking what is essentially Apple’s padlock on the whole system: a check to see whether the connected device is a genuine Apple product.

    yeah, I give it until Thursday.

    • fraydabson
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s been out for a long time with limited access and nothing yet. Maybe Apple will change their mind toward it when it’s being used by a large group of people finally. Hopefully not.

      Edit: I was wrong. See below.

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s been out for a long time with limited access and nothing yet.

        you’re thinking of regular Beeper, wthich used Macs hosted by the company to relay iMessage messages.

        • atocci@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That sounds exactly like what what Nothing Chats was shamed for a couple weeks ago, how has Beeper been fairing so well?

          • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            Beeper’s entire premise is based on decrypting your messages on their servers, re-encrypting them and sending them to you, and pinky promising that they’re not reading them.

            • atocci@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So it really is the exact same thing as Nothing Chats then? I don’t think I trust them any more than Sunbird…

              • beefcat@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                ·
                1 year ago
                • Beeper can be self-hosted if you have a Mac, so you don’t have to trust their servers
                • Sunbird’s app (Nothing Chat) was riddled with its own security vulnerabilities that allowed users to read other users messages, which were all stored as unencrypted plaintext, all discovered by the community within 24 hours of launch
                • Beeper is actually open about how their technology works and what it’s limitations are, while Sunbird/Nothing basically lied about their product and never provided any meaningful documentation
              • Illiterate Domine@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                The difference, as I understand it, is Beeper hasn’t claimed to not be doing that. Sunbird/Nothing touted E2EE and that was a lie.

                • atocci@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That makes sense I suppose. A company that doesn’t outright lie about how their service works would have more goodwill behind it, wouldn’t it.

                  • lea@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Beeper’s backend is also fully open-source, there’s nothing stopping you from hosting your own iMessage bridge and accessing it via any matrix client.

                • beefcat@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It wasn’t just that E2EE was a lie, their own server software was full of its own bugs that allowed third party access to user messages, which were stored unencrypted in their database.