• magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    9 months ago

    I like how the child in the first panel grows up to be the protester in the second panel, and the child in the second panel grows up to be the protester in the third panel.

      • Astongt615@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        And the child in the third panel is arguably the child form of the first pulling-parent. Excellent design!

    • katkit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And the protester of one panel becomes the reactionary in the next panel. The person with red hair can be seen in every stage throughout the panels.

  • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Pacifism is always an unpopular stance, because always, always, always, THIS war is different! THIS war is justified!
    The way pacifists are treated right now, when they criticize involvement in the Ukraine war, is pretty similar to how pacifists were treated before the first World War.

    But also, we shake our heads at the war enthusiasm before WW1, and don’t realize our own today. Cause this war is different.

    (For the record, I’m not personally against supporting Ukraine. But I also realize not everyone who is against involvement is a Putin-bot)

      • Striker@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t that’s what he meant. He meant that many Russian soldiers are brainwashed by propaganda as well.

      • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        With all due respect, you’re literally replying to a post saying that it’ll always be “This war is different, this war is justified” by emphasising how this war is different and this war is justified.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          But that’s not what is happening.

          What is happening is directly pointing out that this was is NOT different. That this war is ALSO unjustified.

          In war, the aggressors are the problem. Period. And lending support to the aggressed is not the same as supporting war.

          It would work, simply letting Russia finish a genocide against Ukraine or Israel finish a genocide against Palestine. The conflict would certainly be resolved that way. But if you think it is an acceptable outcome, you value peace too highly.

          • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh, I agree. Personally I think the world has a duty to stop any country attempting to annex parts of any other country.

            I was just tickled by that exchange.

              • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Ah, ok, I see what’s happened.

                Ok, misunderstanding. I’m not American - I didn’t see the connection with the US being the aggressor in the examples in the comic. I was just interpreting it as ‘Anti-War’.

                The rest of the exchange makes more sense now!

                I was honestly baffled, it felt like I was having a different conversation than everyone else.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          The war in Ukraine is not justified. Supporting Ukraine’s defense is.

          Don’t make the mistake of thinking the opponents of any particular military action are pacifists.

              • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Hanlon’s Razor, my dude.

                Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity

                I realised that I’m in the bad here - I missed the connection between the specific wars in the cartoon (i.e. that the US was/supports the aggressor). I thought it was just anti-war in general.

        • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          That war can end when Russia stops invading another country. Ukraine defending its citizens and territory is right and proper.

          Where are you from?

          • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            I should say what to Russia? I don’t understand.

            I agree that the world has a duty to stop any attempts a country might make to annex another country’s territory.

      • avrachan@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        Back when iraq was invaded, Saddam was the aggressor who bad WMD, it all turned out to be a lie.

        How do you know that American government is telling it’s citizens complete facts about Ukraine war?

        Yes I know Russia is the aggressor here and I am completely against the invasion. However, everyone knew that NATO expansion will trigger a war and US actively pushed for it. American governments hands are not clean when it comes to Ukraine war and American citizens don’t question it at all.

        Which brings me to the cartoon here where if you say the above mentioned statements you will be called a tankie, Putin bootlicker etc.

  • jinarched@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s funny because those are the kind of opinions I developed by going to school.

    • lemmington_steele@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      9 months ago

      and that’s why you can see that once the person has gone to school they protest (in the next panel)

      you then can see in the panel after they protest that they become the parent, telling their child to go to school. presumably because they forgot what they learned at school (or because they think school is the best way for children to learn about these things - which seems a little less likely)

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    If Biden gets reelected and we do the “each party gets two terms then switch” dance that has been going on now for decades, it will be 2036 before we have a chance of electing a president that will hold Israel accountable for its actions.

  • uis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Can anyone make similar picture with texts: “No Afgan war”, “No Chechnya war”, “No Ukraine war” and on every slide police is beating them?

      • fosforus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Sometimes war is necessary because some people want to ruin things more than some people want peace.

        • deegeese
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Making war on their neighbors will not bring peace to Israel.

          • tygerprints@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            No it will only multiply the human chaos and misery in the middle East. And guarantee future retaliation from terrorist cells.

          • fosforus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Well that’s just clearly historically false. Israel wouldn’t even exist without them making war on their neighbors. Or as it initially played out, without winning wars against their neighbors who started those wars.

            About Palestine specifically, it doesn’t seem that not making war against them worked brilliantly either.

        • tygerprints@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I dunno, but I’m totally anti-war even if there are some people (terrorists, criminals, republicans) who want to ruin things for everyone else. I’ll never support Israel in their brutal retaliation against Gaza but I could never support any Palestinians who lug weapons around or use them to hurt others either. What is clear is that giving men guns or weapons guarantees an outbreak of war (they aren’t going to use them to make nice lamps for the living room). My bumper sticker says, to make peace you have to prepare for peace. I guess that’s too hard in this world.

          • fosforus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think that is a 100% admirable position and its only weakness (sadly a big one) is that not everyone thinks like that.

            • tygerprints@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Thank you and I agree that is the fatal weakness of my argument. But, in a way that’s why I feel the need to make it. It’s like putting a pat of butter on an ear of corn, hopefully some of it will melt and sink in if people think about it enough.

      • Kornblumenratte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is Chamberlain in October 1938, returning from Munich to London, waving the Munich Agreement, confident to have appeased Hitler by betraying Czechoslovakia and to have secured eternal peace for Europe. Worked like a charm for 11 month.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      Gee, if only Gaza would vote them out of power. If only they held an election. What is needed for an election? Voting machines and money. Wonder why they can’t get voting machines… wonder why the money for the election is frozen…

      But no, bombing hospitals that you yourself built bunkers under and “imprisoning” (not hostages!) women and children sound like the cheaper, more effective and morally high ground way of getting rid of Hamas.

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wtf are you talking about? Elections aren’t held because Hamas won’t let them happen. Money is frozen because Hamas is a terrorist organization. Voting machines won’t be useful because Hamas will dismantle them for rocket parts and money.

        • randon31415@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, because plastic boxes and paper slips can easily be turned into rockets, and there is no way of selectively unfreezing money for particular purposes in Gaza without Hamas stealing it.

          And why wouldn’t Hamas want elections NOW, after the population has been bombed and genocided into supporting them? Just imagine right after 9/11, could you fathom voting for someone that wanted to “work toward peaceful relations with Al qaeda?”

          • Microw@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Hamas doesnt want elections now because they want elections in the West Bank as well. They need no elections in Gaza because they have total control of Gaza either way.

            Hamas didnt do elections in Gaza for years, and they Sure enough didnt do elections when the people of Gaza protested against them this summer.

    • teichflamme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Really as simple as that.

      These people would cry in their basements if they were sharing a border with Hamas