• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    this is otherwise cool but for FUCKS SAKE stop!!

    all candidates for elective office from the state legislative level on up would run on a single ballot, regardless of their party affiliation. The top four vote-getters would advance to the general election

    you don’t need to do this weird blanket primary nonsense!! you don’t need to do that!! just let whatever parties run candidates be ranked by people on a general election ballot!!

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      the Colorado GOP is exploding from unpopularity and the libertarian party might legitimately replace them

      • ulkesh@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure that’s much better. Most so-called libertarians I know are just GOP-lite and only say they’re “libertarian” in order to feel good about the label they give themselves. The Venn diagram almost completely overlaps.

    • ulkesh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I mean ranked choice should eliminate the need for primaries. I would love to see that nationwide. It would be the first big step toward eliminating parties (or at least making them less required/important).

  • salarua
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    ranked-choice is the wrong choice here. it’s expensive to print new ballots and the process is needlessly convoluted and wasteful. approval voting is not only cheap and effective, it more accurately represents the will of the people

    • Ranvier
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      First I think both approval voting and ranked choice are both vastly superior to first past the post.

      Ranked choice does have some weak points and can create some non optimal outcomes on occasion. Approval voting has its own distortions and issues too though.

      https://electionscience.org/voting-methods/ten-critiques-and-defenses-on-approval-voting/

      I’m personally a little undecided about which one I like better. It might make the most sense to use different voting systems for different types of elections to minimize sub optimal outcomes and avoid their respective weaknesses as much as possible. But honestly I don’t care, either is great, anything except first past the post please.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m generally in favor of approval voting over RCV, but saying it’s expensive to print ballots is pretty silly. Printing is so cheap it may as well be free. Either that, or all the companies that send me junk mail have some wildly delusional ideas about how effective it is.

    • Onihikage@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I always advocate for STAR voting but anything is better than FPTP.

      Also, all ballots should be printed, and they should be tallied by hand.

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      we already have an approval voting party here that runs candidates and they’ve done literally nothing useful to advance the voting method (nor do i think it’s a good voting method or RCV “needlessly convoluted and wasteful”–it’s literally just single-winner STV and i’ve never seen anything but in-the-weeds arguments against STV) so i can’t say i’m sympathetic to this argument

    • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They just print my ballot out on a laser printer when I go to my polling place. My town has one poling place but you can have different districts depending on where you live.