Medical professionals warn it is ‘deeply sinister’ to test women for abortion drugs

        • FarFarAway@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are already some southern states that will test and prosecute for miscarriages, especially if they suspect drug use is involved.

          Brittney Poolaw in Oklahoma was the most recent publicized case of this, but at least 1200 cases have been recorded in the past 20 years or so.

          But, now that so many states are banning abortions, and by way of that abortion drugs, we’ll absolutely see a huge uptick soon enough.

  • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right-wing political philosophy is becoming so authoritarian that we’re really harassing people who just lost their pregnancy, treating them like criminals until proven otherwise.

  • uphillbothways@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cops trying to further victimize victims anytime they get the chance.

    Did something bad happen to you? Don’t fucking tell the cops and don’t seek any help because people are awful and want to make you as miserable as possible whenever they can. That’s the unfortunate reality we live in.

    And we wonder why noone wants to have kids…

  • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trust me when I say police should have absolutely nothing to do with anything healthcare related. They shouldn’t be making decisions about bodily autonomy. They shouldn’t be ordering blood work. None of it. Stay in your Fucking lane.

    If you want to be a doctor go to medical school.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was about to get really mad and rant about Republicans then I saw the .UK,

    This stuff isn’t just American insanity it’s everywhere? Why does this world get worse in my eyes every day…

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because politicians and the media figured out that the easiest way to get people to watch/vote was to appeal to their most basic hatreds and fears, and to even create new ones. Essentially imagine human manipulation as a game, and the game has been solved already. Now this can be countered by teaching people how to actually think for themselves and form their own opinions, but we constantly try and reduce access to education in the world. Were kind of just fucked until the aftermath of WW3 imo.

  • cro_magnon_gilf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Confiscating their phones and testing their bodily fluids… to try and jail them for something they did with their own body. Sick fucks

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Am I missing something?

    Abortions are still deemed a criminal act in England, Scotland and Wales under the 1967 Abortion Act.

    The Abortion Act 1967 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that legalised abortion in Great Britian on certain grounds by registered practitioners, and regulated the tax-paid provision of such medical practices through the National Health Service (NHS)

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The key word there is it’s legalized on certain grounds and by registered practitioners.

      So there’s probably a time frame when it’s allowed, or a preceding incident like rape or incest, and it can only be performed by a registered physician.

      Under a law like the, it would still be a crime to use medications to induce a miscarriage of your own desire.

      It’s all bullshit, but the UK has a lot of things where is technically legal to do something, as long as you’re willing to submit yourself to close government scrutiny.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one was ordering their own abortifacients online in 1967, the rules were to outlaw “backstreet” abortions.

        I don’t know what the limit is, but yeah there’s a cut-off for when a pregnancy can be terminated without medical necessity. When there is medically necessary it can be performed later.

        Either way the procedure is available for free on the NHS.

        While I think the rules are sound, you’d think the police would have learned from the disgraceful treatment of the mothers who were prosecuted - and subsequently had those convictions quashed - due to SIDS

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course there’s a timeframe or circumstances, they are writing as if it’s illegal, which it isn’t.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes…the rest of the article where they explain, in fair detail, the points that you’re not understanding, or… missing.

  • S_204@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ya. This is what America deserves. You won’t like hearing it but this is the find out stage after fucking around for years.

    They let tik tok tell them what’s important to them, so now you’ve got young people cheering for terrorists halfway across the world while their rights are being stripped at home.

    This is exactly as planned and Americans won’t do a damn thing about it because they’ll get distracted by the next viral dance or dead gorilla. RIP Harambe.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article and the events it covers are from the UK. You should probably read the article before commenting on it. I also highly recommend never trusting an Independent headline at face value; they’re infrequently backed up by the body of the article. This is a rare exception.

      • blazeknave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve started to make a habit of reading every article I click entirely before reading let alone contributing comments. Now I see social in a whole new lens… the conversations… Nobody reads the articles.

        Omfg the Internet is an allegory for Penthouse

        • thesmokingman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Independent was that trigger for me in 2016. I kept seeing headlines that were outrageous and fit my perspective. I’d get called on it and have to read the article only to find out it was pure clickbait. Often the article supported the opposite perspective, especially if you followed its sources. I wasn’t used to that, especially from papers of record. Usually blog posts that get big in the tech space don’t make outrageous claims they can’t back up.

          I had The Independent filtered on Reddit for years. It’s the only QoL feature I regularly miss from Reddit clients. Once Lemmy apps add domain filters I’ll be back at Reddit client levels of functionality.

    • nodsocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When lemmings hate America so much they don’t even read the article before spewing propaganda.