Medical professionals warn it is ‘deeply sinister’ to test women for abortion drugs

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Am I missing something?

    Abortions are still deemed a criminal act in England, Scotland and Wales under the 1967 Abortion Act.

    The Abortion Act 1967 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that legalised abortion in Great Britian on certain grounds by registered practitioners, and regulated the tax-paid provision of such medical practices through the National Health Service (NHS)

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The key word there is it’s legalized on certain grounds and by registered practitioners.

      So there’s probably a time frame when it’s allowed, or a preceding incident like rape or incest, and it can only be performed by a registered physician.

      Under a law like the, it would still be a crime to use medications to induce a miscarriage of your own desire.

      It’s all bullshit, but the UK has a lot of things where is technically legal to do something, as long as you’re willing to submit yourself to close government scrutiny.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one was ordering their own abortifacients online in 1967, the rules were to outlaw “backstreet” abortions.

        I don’t know what the limit is, but yeah there’s a cut-off for when a pregnancy can be terminated without medical necessity. When there is medically necessary it can be performed later.

        Either way the procedure is available for free on the NHS.

        While I think the rules are sound, you’d think the police would have learned from the disgraceful treatment of the mothers who were prosecuted - and subsequently had those convictions quashed - due to SIDS

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course there’s a timeframe or circumstances, they are writing as if it’s illegal, which it isn’t.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes…the rest of the article where they explain, in fair detail, the points that you’re not understanding, or… missing.