• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The footage has become a widely cited piece of evidence as Israeli and American officials have made the case that an errant Palestinian rocket malfunctioned in the sky, fell to the ground and caused a deadly explosion at Al-Ahli Arab hospital in Gaza City.

    Israel has responded to the Hamas attack with a relentless artillery and bombing campaign that has killed 5,700 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run Gazan Health Ministry, as the Israeli military prepares for a ground invasion.

    Israel also has cited several other pieces of evidence that have not been made public, including logs of military activity, information gleaned from radar systems, other audio intercepts and other videos.

    In the posts, the Israeli military identified the moving aerial object as a “rocket aimed at Israel” that “misfired and exploded” at nearly the same time as the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital blast.

    Using satellite imagery to triangulate the launch point in those videos, The Times determined that the projectile was fired toward Gaza from near the Israeli town of Nahal Oz shortly before the deadly hospital blast.

    In addition, the videos show that the projectile in the Al Jazeera footage was launched after the barrage of Palestinian rockets Israeli officials assessed was responsible for the hospital explosion.


    The original article contains 1,469 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 86%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • crazyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Important context that the bot misses:

      The Times is only explaining that this video is not of the projectile that struck the hospital. They are not claiming to know the source of that one, only analyzing this video to disprove that it supports Israel’s claims.

      • deegeese
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Israel’s story is wrong, doesn’t that pretty much mean it had to be Israel’s doing?

        Is there any other theory supported by evidence?

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I agree it’s pretty damning, I’d point out that both parties are pretty desperate not to be blamed for the incident (or just generally sow confusion). It’s likely we won’t ever know definitively.

          I’d also point out that because of the immense power imbalance (including the iron dome and broad western support) and a history of strikes against civilian targets generally (that Israel routinely warns Gaza about preemptively), it is more likely that it was an Israeli rocket responsible for the incident. But this is also conjecture and not conclusive.

          If you’re looking for rationale to defend one side or the other, this probably isn’t it.

          • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            We don’t know definitively, but the IDF has been the one spreading FUD and repeatedly lying about the incident, so…

            Hamas has been remarkably consistent in their claims and recent OSINT analysis is overwhelmingly in support of an Israeli strike.

        • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No other story is supported by evidence, but people don’t want to blame the IDF because it’ll undermine support for Israel.