• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They were supposed to let an unhinged person take a potential bomb across an international border?

    They followed the playbook the US would follow right now, once the potential bomb is isolated from collateral damage, explod itor remove the threat…

    • deegeese
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure if troll or idiot.

      They shot an unarmed man in the back to make an example out of him to others who would try to escape.

      • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe read the article before spouting off your ignorance.

        Prosecutors say that on 29 March 1974 the 38-year-old victim entered the Polish embassy in East Berlin carrying a fake bomb and demanded that officials let him cross the border into West Germany.

        They didn’t know he wasn’t armed.

        So let me get this straight… someone shows up at the border of your country with what they claim is a bomb, demanding to be let in. According to you, border guards should just let that person in and let them do whatever they want? Stupid ass.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          someone shows up at the border of your country with what they claim is a bomb, demanding to be let in.

          No. Categorically so. He demanded to be let out. The GDR could’ve just let him walk, making him a West German problem.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m neither a troll or a idiot, at least in my estimation. Your method of insulting the people you speak with doesn’t help you convey your argument.

        • deegeese
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then why are you defending murder?

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because the actions fit the ROE of many militaries and police around the world.

            • deegeese
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, “just following orders”.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Not following orders minimizing risk to loss of life.

                Dude with a bomb wants to walk to your house and the police don’t let him, they take the threat seriously. Thats not following orders that’s doing the job, protecting society